Quantcast
Channel: Cinema Nritya
Viewing all 80 articles
Browse latest View live

Film Classical Dances of Manju Warrier (She's Back!)

$
0
0
Manju Warrier (official website)
Manju Warrier is back and dancing in films again with a fantastic Kuchipudi-based dance in the Malayalam film Ennum Eppozhum released in March! I am beyond delighted. Some time ago I had remarked that Manju Warrier and Lakshmi Gopalaswamy were the only two impressive female classical dancers in recent Indian cinema. But Manju's problem was that she only danced in a few Malayalam films in the short years she was in the film industry and then abruptly left in 2000 when she married the actor Dileep. Difficulty awaited anyone who attempted to track down her film dances online which made Manju a neglected subject on this blog.

When Ragothaman of the Bharathanatyam and the Worldwide Web blog notified me of his discovery of Manju's performance in Ennum Eppozhum, I thought it would be the perfect time to dust off my long-coming post and take advantage of the increase in Malayalam films available online.

Manju's film classical dances are always a large notch above the rest because her training clearly shows through no matter how "filmi" and hybridized the choreography, presentation, or editing style. Her body geometry and precise movements are a pleasure to watch. Comparing her to the mature Lakshmi Gopalaswamy, Manju's only problem is that in her early film dances as a teenager she showed a lack of polish particularly in her abhinaya which consisted almost entirely of a plastered and unwavering smile and also in some of her lines which occasionally weren't quite perfect.

Trained in her youth in the Kalakshetra style of Bharatanatyam (studying at the same institution as fellow film dancer Vineeth) as well as in Kuchipudi and Mohiniattam, Manju studied Kuchipudi more seriously in recent years under Geetha Padmakumar (Vempati Chinna Satyam's style) and performed her debut arangetram in 2012 after not having danced in public for 14 years. She's back!

Manju's Classical Film Dances

Ennum Eppozhum (2015, Malayalam) - "Dhithiki Dhithiki Thai"- After featuring Manju in a dance competition in his 1996 film Thooval Kottaram, director Sathyan Anthikad brings her back for her film dance comeback—a solo Kuchipudi stage number in his film Ennum Eppozhum. While it leans much more classical than most Indian cinema dances, it still has that filmi touch with the copious editing cuts, out-of-place isolated hand gesture closeups, and bits of prettified quick-choreography. But the number makes up for its shortcomings with lovely lighting/backlighting and Manju's seemingly clean and self-assured lines in some of the adagulu inspirations. Compared to her earlier films, Manju seems to be an entirely different dancer here. She actually has more than one facial expression, and her movements are much more relaxed and graceful. Some media articles and reviews misidentify the dance form as Bharatanatyam, but it's definitely Kuchipudi notably in the lively springiness, occasional mouthing of the words, and the classic Kuchipudi arm movements at :27 and :41 among others.


In the song "Pularipoo Penne" from the same film, Manju leads a group Kuchipudi practice scene (yay practice dances!) at 2:33 for a lovely 11 seconds.
Start 2:33

Thooval Kottaram (1996, Malayalam) - I love watching this dance competition between a young 18-year-old Manju Warrier (pink costume) and actress/dancer Sukanya (green costume). Unquestionably "semi-classical" by incorporating pretty "classicalesque" movements with a few classical ones, the choreography is so fun to watch I don't mind. The moves were designed by Kala master (aka G Kala) and have a lot of similarities to her other "classicalesque" film choreographies in Kochu Kochu Santhoshangal, Azhagan, and the dreadful Jyothika-led "Ra Ra" in Chandramukhi.  It's also a perfect example of the stark contrast between a dancer attentive to lines and form (Manju) and a dancer that attempts grace but achieves sloppiness (Sukanya). The part at 4:57 is just sad! After watching Sukanya flail herself around, I was surprised to read that she "studied at Kalakshetra" and was "part of the legendary Chandralekha's troupe." Apparently the director could see the obvious difference in abilities and asked Manju to "underperform" since "Sukanya couldn't match her level."
Start 2:50

Innalekal Illaathe/ Innalekalillathe (1997, Malayalam) - Barely four minutes into this film, Manju performs a semi-classical dance first on stage and then outdoors that seems to be loosely inspired by Kuchipudi in most of the movements and hair ornaments but has some Bharatanatyam inspiration thrown in. That unwavering smile on her face dominates this dance! At 6:49 I had some serious flashbacks to Bhanupriya's dance-at-dawn in Swarnakamalam. Overall, the choreography here is very "faux-classical" and more interested in quick bursts of prettiness than connected dance movements.
Start 3:42

Sallapam(1996, Malayalam) - Featuring the "imagining one's self dancing in one's mind" trope, this song features Manju dancing in three short segments, each with different costumes, with choreography taken from Bharatanatyam it seems. Her dance training is obvious...though her smiling facial expression hardly changes until she's seen in the costume that looks inspired by Koodiyattam.
Dancing begins 2:06


Manju also performs some brief classical dancing in Saakshyam (1995), her very first film,some light "classical" moves in Kudamattam (1997) and Aaram Thamburan (1997), and some folk/popular dancing in Ee Puzhayum Kadannu (1996), Krishnagudiyil Oru Pranayakalathu (1997), Daya (1998), Pranayavarnangal (1998), and Summer in Bethlehem (1998). Surprisingly, while she had a big role in the film Kaliyattam (1997) about a Theyyam dancer, she did not dance at all. And just like her predecessor Shobana, Manju now gets featured in commercials as a dance teacher.

Pleased would I be to see Manju be given some sensitive film choreography worthy of her talents. I can only imagine the film dances we would have been treated to if she would have never left the industry. Here's hoping she can make up for lost time!

More about Manju Warrier

Sayee and Subbulakshmi's Film-Industry Relatives: R. Padma, P.A. Periyanayaki, and Others (Part 3)

$
0
0
Sayee and Subbulakshmi's extended family had many members who were involved in the film industry at that time as actors, playback singers, and technicians behind the scenes. As we learned from the relatives that posted rare details on Richard's blog, the extended family was a closeknit group with connections and bonds in the industry that still last to this day. As I searched for more information to "flesh out" the details of these connections, I discovered that Sayee and Subbulakshmi were closely related to the singer-actresses P.A. Periyanayaki and R. Padma and to AVM Studios sound engineer V.S. Raghavan who did pathbreaking work in Tamil cinema dubbing and syncing. In a twist of fate, some of the films these relatives were involved in had dance direction by Muthuswami Pillai years before P.A. Periyanayaki introduced him to Sayee and Subbulakshmi. And to top it all, a present-generation relative is a talented singer who sang for a just-released Telugu film!

Continuing on from the Muthuswami Pillai series Part 1 and Part 2, here in Part 3, I want to highlight the little information I've been able to find about these relatives and feature some of R. Padma and P.A. Periyanayaki's on-screen singing and dancing performances, one of which is choreographed by Muthuswami Pillai!

My research for this post began when I found the following post on the Facebook account of Nithya Bayya, a Madras-born talented singer and cricketer in the San Francisco Bay Area:
"Came across this wonderful blog post regarding my aunts Sai-Subbalakshmi who were India's famous dance duo in 1940s. Read through the comments and discovered so many facts about my family that i didnt even know. They were actors, singers, sound engineers, cinematographers, dancers ..but most importantly they were pioneers who contributed so much to the world of cinema. I am proud to be a part of such a huge legacy. http://roughinhere.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/sai-subbulaxmi/  Thanks Raghavendra Ganesh, Mom and Dad & Ratchagan for your active participation in proividing so much information. It is also a very humbling experience to see how much they have achieved and how much we need to strive to do something remotely close to what they have done."(Facebook)

Further searching revealed comments Nithya had made on YouTube videos of Sabapathy: 
"My grandmother was R Padma, the heroine of the movie sabapathy. Interesting tidbit, her best friends NSK ayya TA Mathuram were godparents to my mom and were responsible for naming her as well. They named her mathuram too..."(YouTube)
"My grandmother R Padma is the heroine of this movie (the bride who is gettng married in this song). Periya Nayaki amma is my grand aunt. Always loved this song..."(YouTube)
In communications with Nithya, I discovered that R. Padma was Sayee's mother-in-law! R. Padma had married Raghavan V.S. and had five children.  The oldest child, Santaram V.S., married Sayee; middle child Mathuram Babai had a daughter, Nithya; and the youngest child R. Sudha had a son, Raghavendra Ganesh.

After closely reviewing the comments from Richard's blog and the information from Nithya, I've not been able to nail down exactly how this group connects with P.A. Periyanayaki and Subbulakshmi. Nithya describes P.A. Periyanayaki as her grand aunt, Sayee's relatives note P.A. Periyanayaki was Sayee and Subbulakshmi's mother, and Sujatha Vijayaraghavan in Sruti says P.A. Periyanayaki was the aunt and cousin of Sayee and Subbulakshmi. In any case, whether through marriage or blood, the extended family was clearly very close and active in the film industry. And that activity continues today with Nithya who sang a song in the Telugu movie Kiss which just released last month. Here she is being interviewed on a Bay Area show about her cricket and singing activities—she is warm and engaging, and I wish her well!

R. Padma

According to Randor Guy, R. Padma was a "Lux Soap" model who "was active in Tamil cinema during the 1940's, but never made it to the top" and "is barely remembered today." The "Blast from the Past" and related articles at The Hindu list Padma as an actress in: Vaayaadi(1940), Sabapathy (1941), Prabhavathi(1942), Aayiram Thalaivaangi Apoorva Chintamani(1947), Geeta Gandhi(1949), Devamanohari(1951), and as an actress and singer in En Manaivi(1942).

Sabapathy (1941) - "Naan Angae"- R. Padma played "the hero's educated wife who teaches her husband English" in this film. In the song "Naan Angae" below, she performs a dance! Sabapathy was among the very first films Muthuswami Pillai choreographed for. I was surprised to find that the film title cards credited dance direction to not only V.S. Muthuswami Pillai but also Meenakshisundaram Pillai! This must be Vaitheeswarankoil Meenakshisundaram Pillai, Muthuswami's guardian and the person who first introduced Muthuswami to film choreography through his famous students Yogam and Mangalam (see Part One for more information). Perhaps Sabapathi was sort of an "apprentice" film where Muthuswami learned the ropes under Meenakshisundaram. The dance is fascinating considering how early it was filmed. It is presented not for a male patron or courtly admirers but rather for elders/prospective family members (?) in a respectable, domestic setting. Padma's costume is full of gorgeous details, patterns, and designs, and it has a modern sewn-in pyjama fan. I find Padma's dance abilities lacking and she is quite stiff, but the number is a wonderfully-preserved item of historical interest.


En Manaivi (Tamil, 1942) - "Padanathaip Parkap Parkap Pasi"- In this cute song with vocals by Padma herself, she plays a village woman who is amazed by the music she mysteriously heard while at the beach and sings a song about it and the modern marvels of science. The mysterious music at the beach actually comes from the loudspeaker pole seen at :50, which Randor Guy notes was a real loudspeaker in the Madras High Court Beach that "was a novelty and many people flocked there just to listen to music and sounds coming out seemingly from nowhere" (TheHindu).



P.A. Periyanayaki

P.A. Periyanayaki was one of the famous playback singers in South Indian cinema in the 1940s and 1950s. Randor Guy writes, "Hailing from Panrutti, a small town, some hundred miles from Madras, Periyanayaki was blessed with a ringing, bold, melodious voice. Her musical talent helped her make a foray into films when she was 10 in C. V. Raman’s Urvashiyin Kadhal and she gradually pushed her way up mostly in small but singing roles. She attracted attention in T. R. Raghunath’s Prabhavati. Her big moment came when Meiyappan sent for her for Sri Valli."

In Tamil talkies up through the early 1940s, stars had to be able to both act and sing live on camera, and the most popular singing stars of the period were M.K. Thyagaraja Bagavathar (MKT, the "first superstar of South Indian cinema") and P.U. Chinnappa1. As technology advanced, the concepts of dubbing and synching sound slowly came into use. P.A. Periyanayaki is sometimes popularly remembered as the first playback singer in Tamil cinema, but that credit actually goes to Lalitha Venkatraman in the 1938 film Nandakumar (1938)1,2. But P.A. Periyanayaki could be considered the first "post-synchronization" singer in Tamil cinema and certainly the first popular one. When AVM Studios founder A.V. Meiyappan recalled the prints of Sri Valli (1945), replaced Rukmini's voice with Periyanayaki (who had to match her singing to the already recorded visual image!), and rushed the revised prints out to theaters 1,3, Periyanayaki's songs were a huge success and she "emerged as a much sought-after playback singer" and the film "set the trend of playback singing in the industry"3,4.

Interestingly, the innovative chief of AVM's sound department and the person whom A.V. Meiyappan consulted with to replace Rukmini's songs in Sri Valli was none other than V. Srinivasa Raghavan (V.S. Raghavan), who as noted above was R. Padma's husband and the father-in-law of Sayee! Raghavan had trained "under the legendary audiographer C.E. Biggs of the Gemini studios" and had pioneered the "first dubbed film in the history of the Tamil/Indian cinema" when he mixed in a Tamil dialogue track specifically written to match the lips of the Kannada artists in Harishchandra for the dubbed Tamil version released in 19441.

The "Blast from the Past" and related articles at The Hindu (mostly penned by the fabulous walking encyclopaedia Randor Guy) lists P.A. Periyanayaki in the cast of Utthama Puthran (1940), Prabhavati (1942), Vichitra Vanitha (1947), Krishna Bhakthi (1948), and Geeta Gandhi (1949), and as at least one of the playback singers for Sri Valli(1945), Vichitra Vanitha (1947), Gnanasoundari(1948), Prasanna (1950, Malayalam), Kerala Kesari (1951, Malayalam), Vanasundari(1951), Singari(1951), Ulagam (1953), and Marumagal(1953). She also is said to have played the role of Naradar in Rukmangadhan (1946). Online folks have said she sang for some Telugu films like Beedalapatlu (1950), Ammalakkalu (1953), and Oka Talli Pillalu (1953). And it seems widely known that she sang as herself on screen in Sabapathy (1941). But we also know from the film credits that she did playback for Mallaikkalan (1954) and Telugu remake Aggi Ramudu (according to friend of the blog Gaddeswarup)—presumably for Sayee and Subbulakshmi's numbers! I have wondered if Periyanayaki sang for more of their film dances but couldn't find any mention. P.A. Periyanayaki also had a sister P.A. Rajamani, who sang songs in Bhaktha Gowri (1941) and was in the cast of Prabhavathi (1942).

Sabapathy (Tamil, 1941)- "Sundari Nee"- In this number, a wedding celebration for R. Padma's character (who can be seen as the "blushing bride" a few times), P.A. Periyanayaki gives a vocal performance as herself—I love everything about her from her striking presence and powerful voice to the brooch on her sari pallu. She commands your attention! According to a program invitation card that flashes on the screen before this song, the other female musicians are C.V. Dhanalakshmi on the fiddle and V. Neelambari on the mridangam. Isn't it refreshing to see a live performance on film, especially after being subjected to so much horrendous fake-veena playing on screen! What beautiful preservation of these women's talents on film.


What a beautiful legacy these men and women have created for us audiovisually on screen. In Lakshmi Subramanian's words, these "films give us some glimpses into a world that does not otherwise leave any trace."

Last, I will close with this thumbnail I just found of a beautiful, high-quality image of Sayee-Subbulakshmi in the film Naya Sansar (1959)--click on the image to link to the full version at Osianama, a new and promising online Indian digital archive with a great Indian cinema collection:




Sources Cited:
1. Pillai, Swarnavel Eswaran. "Chapter 3: AVM and Gemini Studios: The Dravidian Movement and the Competing Narratives."Tamil Cinema and the Major Madras Studios 1940-1957. PhD Diss.
2. Guy, Randor. "Blast from the Past: Nandakumar 1938."The Hindu.
3. Guy, Randor. "Blast from the Past: Sri Valli 1945."The Hindu.
4. Vasudevan, K.V. "Manorama in Flashback."

Video of Jack Cole Performing "Hindu Swing" in Hollywood Palace (1965)

$
0
0
In my 2011 post on the "Father of Modern Jazz Dance" Jack Cole, I had included a production still of Cole dancing on the American TV show Hollywood Palace (1965). The image captured an important performance for Cole fans and historians because unlike the tight Bharatanatyam inspirations in Kismet (1955) for which Cole was behind the camera choreographing, the Hollywood Palace image captured a performance featuring Cole himself on screen dancing and, given the choice of costuming, likely featured choreography even closer to the Bharatanatyam source than usual.

I assumed the Hollywood Palace footage was lost or locked away in some LA archive somewhere which would be a shame since the extant visual footage of Cole himself dancing in frame is limited and mostly shows him outfitted in American-style clothing with the exception of a brief and tantalizing clip of him in Indian-inspired dress. But my pessimism was misplaced. Thanks to YouTuber Alfred MrDance, we finally get to see the Hollywood Palace footage! I first discovered the clip in its posting at the "Jack Cole, one of the greatest choreographers and dancers ever"Facebook page with different music overlaid. Inquiring by comment referred me to the original video on YouTube. Here it is in all its rare glory:



What soon becomes apparent is that much of the choreography here is the same as or similar to that seen a decade earlier in "Not Since Nineveh" and "Diwan Dances, Pt 1" from Kismet (1955). The Indian-inspired costuming had raised my hopes for something a bit closer to its Indian roots than Cole's standard "Hindu Swing" style. However, the choreography does offer us a few new and tantalizing segments to see Cole perform most notably in those undulating hips at 2:34!

But overall, what I noticed most in this performance of Cole is his aloofness and fatigue. Writings about Cole are open about his tendency to look at the floor and reflect his intense concentration in his face when he danced, and he had a problem with one eye that crossed towards his nose and seemed to cause him to be self-conscious. Unlike the "cool and detached" feel the floor-gazing aloofness lent some of his earlier dance footage (like this "Sing, Sing, Sing" TV performance where it is ideal), in the Hollywood Palace footage it just looks like he is disinterested and would rather be somewhere else. For someone who choreographed and danced so crisply in available footage from earlier years (and was known for tight precision and isolation in movement), his tired bodily stance and the lack of completion in his movements here is surprising. Maybe it was an off day for him? Granted, he was in his fifties here (and sadly died almost a decade later).

I am always amused by the "east Indian jive ballet" juxtaposition of the 1960s spy film jazz music with the Indian-inspired choreography and costume. And those costumes! The thick Bharatanatyam-style head jewelery that wraps around the crown of the head, the ghungroos tied to the toes anklet-style...evocative of the "ethnic" without being authentic.

I had commented last July on my blog's Facebook page about the increased interest I had noticed in Jack Cole's dance and legacy in the media and in the "Hindu Swing" production of the dancer Namita Kapoor. The Hollywood Palace video is a welcome addition to the collective remembrance of Cole on the interwebs and beyond...

Found: Rangam (Malayalam, 1985) and Shobana/Mohanlal's Bharatanatyam and Kathakali Dances!

$
0
0

Rangam, one of the holdouts from my "holy grail" wish list, has finally been uploaded to YouTube! Thanks to cram for informing me of this lucky discovery! As I had hoped, classical dance (Kathakali and Bharatanatyam) serves as the backdrop to Rangam's plot, and no more than 15 minutes go by before dance is seen again either in the background or as a centerpiece. Most exciting of all, there are lots of my beloved dance practice sequences scattered throughout the film!

Rangam is part of the rash of classical arts films that swept South India in the late 70s to 90s starting largely with the success of Sankarabharanam (Telugu, 1979). Rangam seems to be one of the earliest Malayalam films to follow the trend, and it was followed by other similar classical dance/arts films in Malayalam like Swathi Thirunal (1987), Kamaladalam (1992), Swathi Kiranam (1992), Rajasilpi (1992), Devasuram (1993), Manichitrathazhu (1993), Parinayam (1994), and Kaliyattam (1997).

Now on to the dances! I made a comment on the video at YouTube that lists all the dances in the film by category, so if you go there you can click on any timestamp of interest and it will whisk you away to that timestamp on the player. Here are my favorite dances from the film...

Bharatanatyam/Mohiniattam Dances

Practice Dance #1 - What a beautiful 4-minute-plus practice dance! This fits among my favorites of Shobana's film dances. The "heart" of the number and the way it's choreographed and presented seems in the right place, and the dance has a much different "feel" than faux filmi classical dances (such as "Swaathi Hridaya" below). Shobana's long limbs carve beautiful spaces as she leads a group of young women before dancing solo and then shifting to a solo stage performance. Her dance talent shines through here and elevates the number. And those 80s practice sarees with the big blocks of color—love!

Start 26:23

Practice Scene #2 - Only one minute long, this indoor practice scene features Shobana rising to give a solo demonstration for a group of young women. Those sweeping upward arm movements and the circular torso movements of the students seem to be a sped-up film version of Mohiniattam.

Start 1:00:01

"Swaathi Hridaya"- The rare male classical dancer on screen! Here it's Ravindran (aka Raveendran), the popular actor/dancer in 1980s Malayalam and Tamil films who did some entertaining numbers like this disco dance with Silk Smitha. "Swaathi Hridaya" starts out sweetly enough with Ravindran and Shobana practice dancing on the spot and a Shobana stage dance, but it shifts into a "filmi classical" number with Shobana frolicking outdoors and showcasing what I have come to love calling "prettified-quick-choreography." Shame neither Ravindran or Mohanlal join Shobana in the fun!  

Start 47:53

Dance Competition - Yay, more Ravindran practice dancing! We only get a few seconds though, and then Shobana recites some tough solkattu (syllables) and rhythms on the tattukazhi (wooden block) and Mahalakshmi tries her best to match it with her dance which doesn't seem to adhere to a particular style. I wish Shobana would've gotten up and showed her skills with that same deathly expression. This whole scene reminds me of Salangai Oli/Sagara Sangamam not only because of Ravindran's Kamal Hassanesque look and dance but also in the competitive practice dance setting which is reminiscent of the one in Salangai Oli. The homages are made explicit when we see Ravindran and Mahalakshmi watch a clip on their TV of Kamal's famous "Nada Vinodangal" dance in Salangai Oli, a film that obviously had a huge impact after its release in 1983.

Start 1:29:25

Kathakali Dance-Drama

Rangam shows that Mohanlal's performance as a Kathakali artist in the coproduction Vanaprastham (1999) was not his first. Why then has Mohanlal given a clear impression to the contrary in interviews like this one? However, when I watched the Kathakali performances in Rangam carefully (which is easy to do since there is less than 5 minutes total footage), it looked like my assumption that he is always on stage was wrong. In the first Kathakali performance, the dancer seen on stage has different face makeup and adornments than Mohanlal did when shown in closeup in the shot immediately previous (though the casual observer might think they are the same):


In the final performance at the end, I think I see evidence that a double or another artist performed for Mohanlal save a couple brief shots. Compare the details of the forehead makeup from Mohanlal's preparatory scene compared to the two shots from the performance:


But even if Mohanlal didn't perform the difficult choreography/abhinaya on stage, there are other scenes of him teaching rudimentary Kathakali moves and thus "performing" Kathakali in a film.

Looking at the Kathakali in the film as a whole, the footage at the very start of the film of the Kathakali artists preparing for their performance goes beyond the usual makeup and cutti (white jaw border) application shots and shows the pieces of the costume and jewelry being placed and tied on which I found very interesting. Kathakali practice scenes are scattered throughout the film, but they are brief and edited poorly so don't make much of an impact. According to Malayalasangeetham, the Kathakali artists Kalamandalam Hyderali, Jagannatha Varma, Guru Chemancheri Kunjiraman Nair, and Kalamandalam Kesavan (who was also in Vanaprastham), were part of the film's cast. Jagannatha Varma (who was also in Parinayam and Devasuram) can be seen in some of the practice scenes (a screencap below) and for Mahalakshmis' Kathakali practice, and I think the latter two can be seen in the last two screencaps below, on the right and middle respectively:




Mahalakshmi, the westernized temptress in the film, has an interesting Kathakali practice scene where she learns from Mohanlal, and later she dreams of herself in female costume.

Start 1:37:18

The Film

Judging the film purely on what I observed visually (and not understanding a whit of Malayalam), the plot seems to revolve entirely around romance and infidelity among the four stars, the pious Mohanlal and Shobana and the tempted Ravindran and Mahalakshmi. Two "evils" are focused on: sexual temptation/immorality and the corrupting influence of the "West" and its values. Mahalakshmi's character embodies and catalyzes both of these things in the film. In contrast to Shobana's demure sarees and demeanor, Mahalakshmi wears western clothes and hair and welcomes Ravindran's sexual advances with no shame.

Besides not being a virtuous ideal of Indian womanhood, Mahalakshmi also introduces technology into the film when she arrives and videotapes and photographs the Kathakali artists who are seen preening and posing for her (similar to Bhanupriya's camera posing faux pas mid-performance in Swarna Kamalam). Whereas a tape recorder can be seen in the background unused while Shobana is teaching with live musicians, the director often makes sure the tape recorder is clearly visible and in use when Ravindran and Mahalakshmi perform their dances because, you know, they're corrupted and degrading the purity of the art.

Comparing Rangam to later Malayalam films that focused on classical dance, it seems more focused on the romantic quandrangle and coming up with yet another way to fade discretely to presumed lovemaking, and the dance content feels more like a background item that happens to be there rather than something that is artistically and lovingly captured by the camera. Strange and abrupt editing feels jarring, and the locations in the film seem unidentifiable. Kamaladalam, the Malayalam film perhaps closest to Rangam, is a superior production. But, perhaps I missed something not understanding the dialogues—if anyone would like to translate the gist of the film I'd be grateful! Apparently Rangam was a commercial flop, so maybe my impression is spot on. Anywho, what a glorious day that this film is finally available for all to see!

Found: Vyjayanthimala's Devadasi Dance in Piya Milan (Choreographed by V.S. Muthuswami Pillai)

$
0
0
Huge thanks are due to Mr. Naidu for uploading Vyjayanthimala's dance in the 1958 Hindi film Piya Milan (a dub of the 1956 Tamil film Marma Veeran) which was choreographed by the hereditary nattuvanar V.S. Muthuswami Pillai.  I had speculated in my recent post (part one) on Muthuswami's film choreographies that this dance would be as fabulous as his direction of Vyjayanthimala in Chittoor Rani Padmini—and how true that turned out to be!  But what stunned me most about the dance is that it appears to be a preserved example of the "Sadir" devadasi dance of yore known today as Bharatanatyam. It wasn't only the court setting and the costume but also the actual choreography and body language that signified this identification and caught my attention.

As I first watched the dance I could tell that something was different, and by the end I was struck by my reaction and the way I connected with the dance.  I couldn't quite articulate why I thought it was an example of devadasi choreography or what it was that made the viewing experience so different from watching Vyjayanthimala's Bharathanatyam in Chittoor Rani Padmini.  The dance had a certain je ne sais quoi that was unlike anything I'd seen before.  When I first covered the topic of Devadasi-Like Dances in Classic South Indian Films, I focused more on the trappings of the dance like the time period, physical setting, camera work, and patron-focus.  But I didn't have the knowledge to comment much on the actual movements and choreography.  Blogger RameshRam had helped me form a very general view of what made devadasi dance different from its reworked Bharathanatyam form—essentially a wider berth given to internalized skill/spontaneity/grace versus strict classicism/statuesqueness/set parameters.  But when I saw Vyjayanthimala's dance in Piya Milan, I knew that the subject was begging for further analysis and nuance.  None of the devadasi film dances I'd seen so far had charmed me in such an intense way! What was it that made two dance choreographies designed by the same talented nattuvanar feel so different?

In conversation with blogger RameshRam, I learned that he not only felt the same charm in viewing the dance but also articulated the differences instantly and provided a fascinating analysis.  Ramesh doesn't formally write much about dance, but he has a wealth of knowledge about Bharathanatyam and devadasi dance.  I invited Ramesh to share his views which I have edited slightly and provided screencaps for. Read on below to watch the two dances and read Ramesh's excellent piece and thought-provoking conclusion.

The "Devadasi" Dance in Piya Milan (1958)


The "Bharathanatyam" Dance in Chitoor Rani Padmini (1963)

Analysis by RameshRam:

Disclaimer:  I would like to disclaim any impression you may get from reading my post that because I like to see the devadasi STYLE of dance, I am somehow craving for a return of the devadasi SYSTEM and its related patriarchal and flesh-trading trappings. I advise people to show a certain amount of academic detachment while reading my views on the subject.

The same dancer (Vyjayanthimala) and the same dance choreographer (Isai Velalar V.S. Muthuswami Pillai), but what a difference!  These two clips are from within five years of one another and can be considered definitive of the two styles of classical South Indian dance as practiced before and after the Rukmini Devi reformation of the 1930-40s (the Piya Milan dance is definitive of Sadir or the devadasi dance, and the Chitoor Rani Padmini dance is definitive of the style that emerged as Bharathanatyam as practiced by upper-caste and non-traditional practitioners). Apart from the essential difference between classical dance (which usually has a knowledgeable and demanding audience) that Bharathanatyam was designed to be and the populist, people-pleasing classical/popular art form that Sadir had evolved into, there are specific and very telling differences between these two videos which were both choreographed and performed twenty years after the historical events creating Bharathanatyam.  I will try to describe the essential differences designed into these dances as well as some peculiarities that are historical in nature.

The significance of Muthuswami Pillai's choreography, as well as Vyjayanthimala's dance, is that they both straddled a unique time period in the history of South Indian classical dance. Muthuswami Pillai came from Vaitheeswaran Koil and was part of the dance teacher community who between the 1930s and the 1970s created the modern-day Bharathanatyam from the more erotic Sadir (devadasi dance).  Vyjayanthimala was born in 1936, learned dance from traditional practitioners before the Bharathanatyam take-over and was dancing traditional dance in the Mysore court by the mid-1940s.  Both Muthuswami Pillai and Vyjayanthimala were among those who brought the art form fame and 'respectability' as class taboos were left behind (not without hard feelings on many fronts) as the art carried on into independent non-feudal India. I see these two clips as a defining authorial comment on the changes these key players brought to the culture of South Indian dance.

General observations:

You will notice between the earlier clip and the later that the dance is presented more formally and with less personal connection between the dancer and the audience. The earlier clip shows Vyjayanthimala trying to seduce the audience with her charm into a relationship with the dancer through dress, accessories, gesture, and eye contact.  In the later clip, she is dressed to impress and to be definitive of a culture of dancing womanhood, but in her minimalist virtuosity doesn't deign to expect a reaction from the audience even if the audience is God.

Specific observations on each video:

Piya Milan - (Devadasi style) - The first thing you notice is Vyjayanthimala attracting attention toward her through soft hand and foot gestures intended to show beauty.  When the camera pulls out, you can see that she is dressed like a Kathak dancer but completely in South Indian dance attire (the Bharathanatyam costumes were formalized and made to look more like South Indian statuary as will be evident in the Chitoor Rani Padmini piece).  These earlier costumes were standard fare for devadasis dancing in the Chinna Melam where audiences were limited in number and private. Vyjayanthimala's hand and feet gestures have both a beautiful formalism as well as a lazy charm that is from the Sadir dance of that period.  At no point does she give the impression that she is trying to teach people about her culture or dance but is instead trying to show them a happy, prosperous, and good time.

The setting she is dancing in is also interesting.  She is surrounded by patrons who watch her admiringly and she never forgets that she is dancing to communicate to them.  She takes the time to add grace to what are essentially pure dance gestures so that when someone who has no prior knowledge of Bharathanatyam watches the dance they can only see a well-stitched together set of gestures of a graceful dancer.  The grammar of the dance takes a back seat to the beauty that the dancer imbues into the dance.  Her pure dance interludes are filled with very well-executed formalism, but in the overall structure of the dance they come across as interludes between her natya (drama) essays.  People who lamented in that time period that Sadir had descended into a crass, near-prostitution, salon-dancing style were perhaps oblivious to the fact that great dance teachers and dancers could create the kind of magic you see in the Piya Milan dance which is classy and seductive.

The entire effort seems geared towards creating a magical effect of storytelling from the dancer to each audience member—one at a time.  The sense of magic is created because of the personal connection established by the dancer with the patron.  For the patron, the rest of the audience has ceased to exist by the time the dancer has woven her web.

Chittoor Rani Padmini - In this Bharathanatyam piece, also choreographed by Muthuswami Pillai, you see a very different Vyjayanthimala.  Here the dancer not only has the straight-backed elegance of a trained Bharathanatyam dancer, but she also has the introspective austerity of gesture that a dancer trying to project her art as a definitive symbol of her culture would practice.  There is equal weight given to pure dance (which is straight-backed and well-executed) and natya (drama) which serves here to describe the complex compositional structure of the dance (perhaps this reflects the changed priority where Bharathanatyam dancers were more preoccupied with projecting the greatness of the dance and devadasis were more with entertaining their audience).

Vyjayanthimala is dressed and has the comportment of a temple statue from the Gupta Period, thus recalling the ancient natya shashtra traditions of Bharata Muni of yore.  Her expressions while being very expressive of the lyrics of the dance do not allow the dancer any additional leeway in communicating with the unseeing audience (she dances to the stone idol in devotion).  This does not mean that the dance is not expressive—rather like classical ballet the expressiveness of the dance is brought out by the formalist tropes that Bharatanatyam has evolved into from the highly-personal practitioners dance that was Sadir.

Conclusion:

So which dance was better?  The pre-evolution Sadir or the post-evolution Bharathanatyam? While it is understandable to ask a question like that, as someone watching YouTube clips 50 years after the fact, the answer is really meaningless.  I would like to see both kinds of dance practiced because they each have their personal voices imprinted deeply into what we can clearly see is a common tradition.  However, we find that one of these traditions is lost, perhaps forever, because of the way classical and popular dance forms evolved between the 1930s and the 1970s.  Both Muthuswami Pillai, who passed away in 1992, and Vyjayanthimala Bali, who is still alive as of this writing and has up to recently practiced Bharathanatyam, have quite consciously shaped the history and the form of classical dance in South India to suit the changing social milieu.  Maybe there will be a conscious revival of devadasi-style classical South Indian dance with the postmodern maturity it takes to take and preserve all its component parts without needing to change it, censor it, or preserve it in academic formaldehyde.  A living, growing dialogue between devadasi dance and Bharathanatyam can only be of cultural benefit to everyone concerned.

Muthuswami Pillai's Star Students, Sayee and Subbulakshmi, and the "Twin Dance" Phenomenon (Part Two)

$
0
0
The Sayee and Subbulakshmi sisters were the best South Indian "twin dance" duo of Indian cinema in the 1950s and 1960s, and I don't think anyone has matched them since!  Their speed, precision, flexibility, springing leg movements, and most of all their ability to dance synchronized with each other was unparalleled. Unfortunately, they seem hardly remembered today outside of some film/classical dance enthusiasts—and a surprise inclusion in a recent conference on dance and music in early South Indian cinema! A mention of the sisters in a 2011 Indian newspaper article about classical dance in Indian cinema wrongly claimed that they danced only in the Hindi films Azad and Chori Chori"before disappearing." But bloggers and dance enthusiasts such as myself, Richard, Tom, and Lakshmi Subramanian, who have delighted in, discussed, and preserved the sisters' film dance sequences for years now, know better! Sayee-Subbulakshmi specialized in Bharatanatyam and had the heaviest presence in Tamil cinema (at least 13 films), but they also performed Kathak and folk styles and danced in other regional-language and Hindi films. And they were simply spectacular!

Sayee
Back in 2010, Richard's post about Sayee-Subbulakshmi at his lovely Dances on the Footpath blog was graced by comments from Sayee's nephew and son informing readers with details about films the duo had danced in, family relations, that they learned Bharatanatyam from "Shri Muthuswami Pillai," and the sad news that Sayee had passed away in 2010. At the time I had no idea who "Muthuswami Pillai" was and promptly forgot the detail!


Subbulakshmi
But when I found a lengthy feature about V.S. Muthuswami Pillai in Sruti magazine, I was astounded to make the connection back to the comments from Sayee's relatives and even more astounded to learn how involved Muthuswami was. While Muthuswami began choreographing for films around 1938, it wasn't until a few years later that a fateful meeting with P.A. Periyanayaki introduced him to the young girls that would eventually become his star students who would perform "far and wide" and be "among the busiest artists of their time"--Sayee and Subbulakshmi (aka Sayee-Subbulakshmi, Sai-Subbalaxmi, etc.)! While I introduced Muthuswami Pillai and his other film choreographies in Part One and the Piya Milan addendum, here in Part Two I want to celebrate the talents of Sayee-Subbulakshmi by showcasing all of their known film dances, recognize Muthuswami Pillai's training and chiseling of their talent, and analyze his dance style.

Sayee and Subbulakshmi's
Training with Muthuswami Pillai

These priceless photos and excerpts are quoted from musician-dance scholar Sujatha
Vijaraghavan's articles/interviews about V.S. Muthuswami Pillai in Sruti magazine (issues 319 and 320) written around 1990-1991:

Sayee, Muthuswami, Subbulakshmi (Sruti)
"It was while in Salem, directing B.S. Saroja's dance for the film Inbavalli produced by Modern Theatres, that he came across his star pupils Sayee and Subbulakshmi. Sayee's mother P.A. Rajamani and her aunt P.A. Periyanayaki were a popular duo called Madras Sisters, who had been giving Carnatic vocal music recitals. Periyanayaki had entered the films as a playback singer. She met Muthuswami Pillai at Salem and requested him to teach her niece, Sayee and her cousin Subbulakshmi. Sayee, the taller and somewhat heavier of the pair, was actually younger by three years to Subbulakshmi.  ‘I must have started when I was about five,’ says Sayee, now approaching fifty, still agile with a spring in her step. Theirs was a large joint family where the dance teacher was welcomed as one more member.  ‘He stayed with us and taught Subbulakshmi and me for nearly seven years before we had our arangetram,’ she recounts. It was not an unbroken period.  For a space of about two years he was in and out of Madras, spending more time at Kuttalam and on his film assignments outside Madras.  But the lessons resumed every time he was in town.  

These talented teenagers could translate Muthuswami Pillai's taxing choreography to its best advantage.  Petite and agile, these girls, not exactly pretty, had a charming mein nevertheless, lighted by a natural smile.  Their fast movements, breathtaking pirouettes and clock-like precision earned them the sobriquet 'Pambara sahodarigal' (Spinning Top Sisters).  Muthuswami Pillai became busier than ever with their programs on stage and on the silver screen.  Following the hit films Malaikkallan and Rathakkanneer, a spate of film assignments in several languages followed.  It was an odd situation with the dance teacher spending his entire time teaching just two pupils.  For a period of nearly seven to nine years this is what Muthuswami Pillai appears to have done."

Sayee, Muthuswami, Subbulakshmi (Sruti)
Sayee and Subbulakshmi recalled their training with Muthuswami: "Our 'arangetral' was on 14th September 1953, at R.R. Sabha Hall and was presided over by Rajah Sir M.A. Muthiah Chettiar, M.L.A. (Rajah of Chettinad).  It was on Vijayadasami day.  Our 'vidyarambham' and salangai pooja were also held years ago on Vijayadasami days. Of the several films in which we danced, Malaikkallan was produced in many languages, namely Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada and Sinhalese. Muthuswami Pillai directed our Bharatanatyam numbers in the Tamil and Telugu version. Though we danced in films, our mainstay was Bharatanatyam. Up to the early sixties, Vadyar devoted most of his time to train us and conduct our recitals.  We looked after all his needs, paid him individually for our concerts and he had his film assignments.  He did not have much time to spare after teaching us.  It was three hours in the morning and three to four hours in the evening. We were allowed to rest for hardly five minutes.  We were not permitted to sit down. It was non-stop practice and rehearsals all the way. Our grandmother was particular that we should not present items performed commonly by other dancers. Hence, when we wanted to do a snake charmer's dance, lyrics were composed and set to music by the music director G. Ramanathan.  It went something like this: Karaiyaan veedu katta - athil karunaagam kudi irukka. Vadyar took a lot of interest in creating new items for us.  He fashioned numbers which were lively and could be performed by us as a duo. [...] 'He has taken Subbulakshmi and me to Kumari Kamala's dance many a time,' remembers Sayee, 'perched on his shoulder I have watched her performance at the exhibition.'"

Notice in that article that Sayee and Subbulakshmi are presented not as sisters and daughters of P.A. Periyanayaki (as Sayee's relatives had said on Richard's blog) but as P.A. Periyanayaki's niece and cousin respectively. They are certainly at the very least close relatives, and given that they trained and danced together for so long during their formative years, they are surely sisters in practice if not in relation! I'll discuss this a bit more in my follow-up post Part 3.

Muthuswami's
Bharatanatyam Style

After watching all of Sayee and Subbulakshmi's film dances, it is clear that what made them unique was their mastery of the difficult combination of speed plus precision, their effortless movements in and out of seated positions (half-seated araimandi, fully seated muzhumandi) and mandi adavus and kneework, their flexibility and deep backbends, and their lightning-fast spins that gave them their "Pambara Sahodarigal" ("Spinning Top") namesake.

Araimandi (left), Muzhumandi (right)

Most of the information about Muthuswami's bani (style/school) of Bharatanatyam focuses on his creativity during his "French period" starting in the 1970s. He was known to be a very strict teacher who would not let a student progress until perfection was reached, and he taught one-on-one and often demonstrated movements himself. Sujatha's articles describe Muthuswami's "innovationsin nritta [pure dance]" which "came to be recognised as his bani" as the following:
"The movement was fluid and continuous." [...] "Space ceased to be linear. It was round, rather a prismatic globe. The adavus were performed as the body rotated on its axis." [...]  "His choreography took dance from its usual three-pronged (two diagonals and the front) attack into an eight-directional, multi-dimensional invasion." [...] "An innovation of Pillai was converting the adavu-s traditionally done using both hands into single-handed adavu movements while the other hand rests at the hips or at the side in dola hasta."
"The two triangles defined by the body in araimandi were exploited by Muthuswami Pillai to exude energy and dynamism. The power of the bent knee was twofold. It served as the springboard for leaps, jumps and dives.  And it gave the momentum to cover space in swift glides. In fast footwork, the feet kept moving in all directions like a spinning top in orbit. The araimandi was intact through entire adavu sequences and the stage was covered from end to end..."
"'Power with grace' would define his bani to some extent. Very often power in dance results in lumpen stomping, strutting and robotic precision. In the name of grace, loose-limbed wooziness blurs the lines and ruins the geometry. The kind of body control that Pillai imparted ensured that grace and visual aesthetics were the end. Power was employed only as a means to achieve clarity of lines. What he called grace comprised the ease with which the movement was accomplished, together with the joy of the art experienced by the dancer..."
"A physical movement was not mere flexing of the limbs.  The entire being had to be involved.  What scholars would call 'rasa' and what Vazhuvoor Ramiah Pillai defined as 'bhavam in adavu', was emphasised by Muthuswami Pillai in his own way."
In Sujatha's article, little is written about Muthuswami's style during his earlier period when he trained and choreographed for Sayee and Subbulakshmi on stage or in cinema. She only writes, "With his early disciples Sayee and Subbulakshmi, he had not done anything new or innovative in nritta or abhinaya, but had infused speed into their movements. The fact that the sisters were agile and nimble footed enough to do each movement perfectly added sparkle to the dance."

But now that we have the benefit of viewing a number of Sayee and Subbulakshmi's film dances online, I don't think it's a stretch to view everything but the first paragraph in the description of Muthuswami's innovations as applying perfectly to the sisters' dance style as recorded in cinema. They are the epitome of power, springing-leg movements, body control, grace, effortlessness, and most of all complete joy while dancing. While most of Sayee-Subbulakshmi's film dances that Muthuswami choreographed focus heavily on abhinaya [interpretive dance] with brief moments of moderate nritta [abstract/pure dance], the last minute of the song "Kadavai Saathadi" in Rathakkanneer offers a powerful demonstration of Muthuswami's training and style. It's also instructive to compare the sisters' Bharatanatyam choreographed by the other dance directors who pushed the power and speed too far, compromising the lines and grace a bit for the sake of a dazzling effect.

Given how effortlessly the sisters could handle notoriously difficult mandi adavus and kneework, it is easy to understand why Muthuswami is said to have focused more on nritta rather than nritya. In an interview posted at the Sacred Space blog, Dominique Delorme noted that during the last few years of Muthuswami's life, he "composed a lot of new things, both adavus and choreographies. My choreographies were full of mandi adavus. Maybe because I was a boy and he thought a boy could manage it! I think he got his inspiration from his students." And surely his inspiration began with the most-inspiring and talented dancing duo one could ask for, Sayee-Subbulakshmi! Dominique Delorme must have been a dream for Muthuswami who could harken back to the work he did with Sayee-Subbulakshmi. I do wish there was footage of Dominique dancing in Muthuswami Pillai's style—of the video available online, Dominique seems to be focusing on the popular Bharata Nrityam style he learned under Padma Subramaniam.

I wonder if any of the flashy embellishments that the other choreographers included were based on movements the sisters had learned from Muthuswami Pillai, or perhaps they were common in the "bags of tricks" film dance directors used in those days. Sujatha notes there were movements outside of the "Sadir tradition" that inspired Muthuswami, such as the "leg-bending exercises he had observed the Lambady tribe perform." The Lambadi tribe in Andhra Pradesh is related to the nomadic Banjaras spread across India and originally from Rajasthan. If you watch the video comparison playlist below, you can see the movement that was the likely source of inspiration for some of the sisters' folk movements and general bounciness.



The "Twin Dance" Phenomenon
in Tamil Cinema

Naam Iruvar
Sayee and Subbulakshmi's famed format was a Bharatanatyam-based version of what I like to call the "twin dance" in which two dancers perform the same movements side-by-side in unison.  From my research of Tamil cinema (and I suspect perhaps all of Indian cinema?), it seems Nattuvanar Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai began the trend with his star student Baby/Kumari Kamala.  Trick film techniques doubled Kamala's image on the screen so it appeared there were two of her dancing at once.  While it appears Vazhuvoor first directed Kamala with this technique in 1945 in the dream sequence in Sri Valli, it was Kamala's twin dances in "Aaduvome" and "Vetri Ettum" from Naam Iruvar (1947) that became popular due to the wild success of the film.

Vedhala Ulagam
Starting in that same year of 1947, the "Travancore Sisters" Lalitha and Padmini sprung onto the film scene with Kannika in a mythological "twin dance" done not by a one-person camera trick but by two real bodies with the novelty of their real-life sisterhood.  The "twin dance" trend repeated throughout all of their earliest Tamil dances: Vedhala Ulagam (1948), Mayavathi (1949), Laila Majnu (1949), Mangayarkarasi(1949), Manthiri Kumari(1950), and their first donning of a Bharatanatyam-style costume in Marutha Nattu Illavarasi (1950). But the choreography seemed inspired more by the graceful Uday Shankar style they had learned for his 1948 Hindi film Kalpana, not Bharatanatyam.

Nallathambi
There were a few other Bharatanatyam-style twin dances before Sayee-Subbulakshmi came on the scene.  Most notable were those of the young Bharatanatyam artist MK Saroja with another dancer (unknown, on the right) seen in Paithiyakkaran (1947) and Nalla Thambi (1949). MK Saroja was one of the leading Bharatanatyam dancers in 1940s Madras, and she learned Bharatanatyam exclusively from the top-ranking nattuvanar Muthukumara Pillai, the same nattuvanar Muthuswami Pillai had his advanced training from in his youth. But after only dancing in three films, MK Saroja married Mohan Khokar and left the film industry. The twin dance style later showed up briefly in Pathala Bhairavi (1951, the only Telugu example) and fully in Parasakthi (1952).  

Malaikkalan
But the "twin dance" format didn't reach its zenith until 1954 when Muthuswami Pillai choreographed for Sayee and Subbulakshmi in their first films, Malaikkalan and Rattakkanneer. The dances, drawn straight from Bharatanatyam, were performed with incredible form, gravity-defying vigor, and most impressive of all: perfect sync. Perhaps Muthuswami Pillai, seeing the talent his sister-duo possessed, took inspiration from the successful film "twin dances" his peers had choreographed before him and capitalized on the opportunity to make the dance format sparkle with a real-life sister pair capable of performing his difficult choreography with effortless aplomb. In Muthuswami Pillai's hands, the "twin dance" format became visually arresting and "popped" on the silver screen.

Like Kamala's dances in Naam Iruvar, these dances of Sayee-Subbulakshmi clearly sparked another trend for "twin dances" in Tamil (and likely all of Indian) cinema that lasted through the early 1960s and also inspired countless court and heavenly dances in mythological films. This time, the imitators often tried to duplicate the quick and well-formed movements of their famous counterparts, but they could never quite match them. In a solo dance, small mistakes or differences in timing are hardly noticed, but in the "twin dance" format they are amplified. After 1954, twin dances by dancers other than Sayee-Subbulakshmi were seen in a slew of Tamil films like Neethipathi (1955), Rambhayin Kadhal (1956), Manalane Mangayin Bhagyam (1957), Iru Saghotharigal (1957), Raja Rajan (1958) Manimekalai (1959), Ponni Thirunaal (1960), and Inthira En Selvam (1962). From all the twin dances I've seen, it was only L Vijayalakshmi and another dancer in the Tamil film Kuravanji (1960) that came anywhere close to the defining light-on-the-feet style of Sayee-Subbulakshmi.  It is surprising that after Naam Iruvar, Kamala appears to have not reprised the speedy twin dance style until Bhakta Kuchela (1961) when she performed with her sister Rhadha. Beyond Tamil cinema, the only "twin dances" I can think of nearly all come after 1954, like Donga Ramudu(Telugu, 1955), Basant Bahar (Hindi, 1956), Sarpakaadu (Malayalam, 1965), and the many Kathak-oriented dances in Hindi cinema.

Muthuswami Pillai's Direction
of Sayee-Subbulakshmi's Film Dances


While Sayee-Subbulakshmi performed many different dance styles throughout their career in films, their claim to fame was their riveting Bharatanatyam. And it was at its best and most authentic under the direction of Muthuswami Pillai who introduced the duo to cinema. Muthuswami Pillai's choreography of Sayee-Subbulakshmi is presented earnestly and authentically with good lines and form even when the pace increases. Here are the four dances (and acting scenes!) I have been able to locate:

Malaikallan credits
Malaikallan (Tamil, 1954) - Sayee-Subbulakshmi debuted in films in 1954 with the hit film Malaikkallan.  Thanks to RajVideoVision who posted the entire film online, I was delighted to find that in addition to the dances the sisters have three scenes featuring small speaking roles presumably in their own voices!  Such fantastic documentation of these young women for us all these many years later.

Acting Debut: Sayee and Subbulakshmi play Alli and Valli, relatives of the infamous but mysterious robin-hood type figure Malaikkallan (MGR), who has saved Poonkothai (Bhanumathi) from evil kidnappers by orchestrating a "kidnapping" of his own in disguise.  Malaikkallan takes Poonkothai to his secretive cavely home where his family cares for her.  Alli and Malli are first seen at 50:02 where they beckon Poonkothai to come eat and then later at 1:00:02 they invite her to view their dance.  The sisters are so adorable and seem quite wooden and uncomfortable—I especially love the part when MGR playfully pushes Subbulakshmi's head at 1:00:20.  Alli and Valli are last seen acting at 1:22:36 when they invite Poonkothai to dance for them, and their final folk dance is near the end of the film and covered later in the post.
Acting debut! Starting 50:02

"Neeli Magan Nee Allavo" - This dance was Muthuswami Pillai's introduction to the world of Sayee-Subbulakshmi's dancing talent in film. The dance, encoded in beautiful quality below by Tom Daniel, takes place in the same outdoor location sporting events had been staged before, but with the addition of a soft, decorative carpet.  With an audience of family members and rustic villagers (and a restless leopard), Sayee and Subbulakshmi look directly at the camera and draw the viewer in with their abhinaya. The pure dance portion begins at 3:00 and is relatively tame compared to their later dances. Mallaikkalan was released only a year after Sayee and Subbulakshmi had their debut Bharatanatyam arangetram, and based on the dates from Sujatha's article the sisters would have been around 13 and 16 respectively.


Aggi Ramudu (Telugu, 1954) - "Rara Yasoda Nandana" - Malaikkallan was remade in four other languages: Aggi Ramudu (Telugu), Thaskaraveeran (Malayalam), Azaad (Hindi), and Soorasena (Sinhala).  Only Aggi Ramudu retained Muthuswami Pillai as the dance director (while only Thangaraj is listed in the credits [thanks Gaddeswarup for the translation], it is obvious Muthuswami directed this dance as he/SS claimed), and it is interesting to compare it to the version in Malaikkalan.  In Aggi Ramudu, while the pure dance sections are very similar, the movements expand further into folk items like the clasped-hand-spin at 2:43 and the abhinaya and gestures are completely different (and the poor leopard looks like he's had enough!). Sayee-Subbulakshmi have the same acting roles, but this time Subbulakshmi gets her head pushed by NTR :).  Here is the lovely dance, "Rara Yashoda Nandana":


Rathakkaneer (Tamil, 1954) - "Kadavai Saathadi"- Supposedly released a few months after Mallaikkalan in 1954, Rathakkanneer has what is perhaps the most classically-strict of all of Sayee-Subbulakshmi's film dance numbers.  Muthuswami's direction of the dance is confirmed in the title credits. Following in the tradition of Mallaikkalan and many of the sisters' later film dances, the first few minutes are devoted mostly to expressive abhinaya and gesture, while the latter portion switches to pure instrumental dance.  Starting at 3:02, the sisters perform in such near-perfect synchronization it is almost unreal! The sister's spectacular leg work is finally introduced starting at 3:15 with the knee-to-floor mandi adavus and the effortless drops from standing to seated leg positions.  But everything is very controlled and extremely precise, something that as you will later see loosened and relaxed quite a bit. Such a spectacular and precise number!  It must have been a delight for Muthuswami to see his difficult choreography come to life with these talented sisters.


Doctor Savithri (Tamil, 1955) - "Nayagar Pakshmadi" - Switching to a proscenium stage setting with a middle-class, mixed-gender audience, this barely three-minute dance number follows a similar format and look as the dances above but with no rousing rhythmic finale. I imagine the sisters were well-known to filmgoers by this time after their debuts the year earlier. I've not been able to locate the full film, but since it was part of Muthuswami's list and has all of his hallmarks, it is clearly his work. I love the sisters' effortless drops into low positions and legwork at the beginning and at 1:56.


President Panchatcharam (or Panchaksharam, Tamil, 1959) - I've not been able to locate this film or any dances from it, but it's one of the few films that Randor Guy notes a Sayee-Subbulakshmi dance in (he rarely mentions them for some strange reason, unlike Kamala, and never mentions Muthuswami Pillai), so I'm guessing it's great! 


Sayee-Subbulakshmi's Film Bharatanatyam
by Other Choreographers

Most of Sayee-Subbulakshmi's film Bharatanatyam not choreographed by Muthuswami Pillai was the work of the nattuvanars P.S. Gopalakrishnan and/or K.N. Dhandayudapani (or looks like it), and it is easy to see the difference. It is under these choreographers, particularly Gopalakrishnan, that the speed the sisters danced at is increased to an almost super-human pace—and I'm convinced the film was artificially sped up a bit to enhance the effect and dazzle viewers. It's FUN to watch and the moves are performed expertly as only Sayee-Subbulakshmi could, but the Bharatanatyam choreography extends beyond its usual boundaries and incorporates more filmy movements and embellishments. The moves are performed so quickly that the sisters don't always complete them, but they are such pros that you hardly notice!

This illustrates that a film dance's authenticity to Bharatanatyam was not guaranteed just because the dance director was a nattuvanar. P.S. Gopalakrishnan (PSG) is a name that I have seen referenced many times in regards to 1950s and 60s South Indian (mostly Tamil) film dances especially when browsing the National Film Archive of India's search feature. I've never been able to find much information about him other than a listing of his participation at the 1957 Music Conference of the prestigious Madras Music Academy as the nattuvanar for a Bharatanatyam performance. He composed a lot of what I consider not-very-good Bharatanatyam in films—like the dances of Padmini in Thillana Mohanambal and Mannadhi Mannanwhere the emphasis is more on showy athleticism and statuesque postures with significant filmy alterations rather than maintaining proper form. K.N. Dandayudapani Pillai (KND), on the other hand, is a nattuvanar who is well remembered and respected for his dance style and Kalakshetra training in nattuvangam. He is credited for a few film dances, some with P.S. Gopalakrishnan, but Pillai also composed some excellent Bharatanatyam numbers in cinema like Kamala in Chori Chori or Radha Burnier in The River.

Playlist: Sayee-Subbulakshmi's Speediest Bharatanatyam!

Prepare yourself to be DAZZLED by the speediest segments from Sayee-Subbulakshmi's speediest film Bharatanatyam ordered in increasing pace culminating in the off-the-charts dance in Mangalya Bhagyam! Instead of embedding a gazillion videos in the post, I've decided to try something new—a playlist! Here's a listing of the songs in the playlist below with some quick info tidbits:
  • Thaiku Pin Tharam (Tamil, 1956) - Naadu Sezhithida - Bharatanatyam followed by folk/possible Lavani. Choreographer not listed (credits).
  • Karpukkarasi (Tamil, 1957) - "Vizhiyodu Vilaiyadam" - Choreographer not listed (credits).
  • Arivaali (Tamil, 1963) - "Vazhiya Needozhi" - Choreographer: PSG (cr)
  • Sivagangai Seemai (Tamil, 1959) -"Muthu Pugazh Padaithu" - Choreographer: KND (according to Randor Guy). A fast-paced, rhythmic expose with raaga-scaling vocals by S. Varalakshmi and Radha Jalalakshmi.
  • Mangalya Bhagyam (Tamil, 1958) - "Nenjathile Acham Illaathavar" - Choreographers: Gopalakrishnan (assume PSG), Sampath Kumar, Chinni Lal (film credits). Insanely frenetic dancing supported by a challening vocal duet of P. Leela and MLV. 
Speediest excerpts from each dance!


Sayee-Subbulakshmi in Azaad

Azaad (Hindi, 1955) - "Aplam Chaplam" - This film dance is perhaps Sayee-Subbulakshmi's most famous, and in the rare moments that the sisters are remembered today it is the one usually mentioned.They were named (with surprisingly accurate spelling) in the credits along with dance director Hiralal.  Azaad was the Hindi remake of Malaikalan and Aggi Ramudu, and the sisters' dance departs significantly from those predecessors.  There are a few bits of Bharatanatyam dance but mixed in are generous amounts of filmy movements appropriate for a Hindi film. The hand gestures and poses here are primarily decorative and the number is designed to be catchy, fun, and entertaining. I'm surprised the sisters retained their South Indian costume in the Hindi version! Thanks to Tom Daniel for uploading the dance with great quality and English subtitles!


Thaskaraveeran (Malayalam, 1957) - "Chapalam Chapalam" - How surprising to learn that the Malayalam remake of Mallaikkalan, Thaskaraveeran, did a straight copy of "Apalam Chapalam" but replaced Subbulakshmi with another unknown dancer. She does a fantastic job, especially with the difficult leg work! Anyone know who she is?


All the Rest:
Sayee-Subbulakshmi's
Non-Bharatanatyam Film Dances

Beyond Sayee-Subbulakshmi's mainstay of Bharatanatyam, the sisters were also able to perform many other styles of film dance with surprising grace and finesse. Their expressive faces and flexible bodies adapted to whatever was thrown at them. I find myself often gravitating to Sayee (the taller one) in these dances because she adds an extra touch of oomph to her movements. The sisters are also said to have danced in the film Naya Sansar (1959), but I've not been able to find any videos or information.

I've embedded a playlist with all of the sisters other film dances below, but I have to feature the numbers in Kann Thirandadu and Periya Kovil by themselves first because they are ridiculously awesome dances. Enjoy!

Kann Thirandadu (Tamil, 1958) - "Vanakathu Vanakathu" - Of their non-classical numbers, Sayee-Subbulakshmi's rhythmic spectacular from 2:17 onward in this dance is my absolute favorite. That move at 3:07 exemplifies the "spinning top" namesake better than anything could! The film is obviously sped up a bit, but the effect is simply magical! Here's the fascinating part—Muthuswami Pillai includes this film on his list of film choreographies. Perhaps he misremembered, but based on his work above this does not seem like something he would have choreographed. The credits don't list any dance direction, so it's hard to say for sure. Whoever is responsible for it, the editing makes it spectacular (and you might have to click the link to watch it on YouTube due to playback restriction). Start at 2:17 and prepare to be amazed!


Periya Kovil (Tamil, 1958) - "Aathaadi Thalaatha Thaathaavai" 
- The choreography by PSG here plays off the music so well that the entire song is a delight! Look how the rhythm courses through Sayee at 3:33. The sound seems a few milliseconds out of sync, and I think the vocals are dubbed. 



Playlist: All the Rest: Sayee-Subbulakshmi Potpourri
  • Chori Chori (Hindi, 1956) - "Man Bhavan Ke Ghar" - Dance direction: KND (this clearly makes sense for Kamala's fantastic Bharatanatyam number in the film, but not so much for Sayee-Subbulakshmi's Kathak number. Perhaps another choreographer, like Gopi Krishna, assisted?) The sisters show here that they can perform movements outside of their learned tradition with graceful lithesomness. 
  • Sharada (Hindi, 1957) - Choreography: Hiralal and Sathyanarayan (credits). A fun tribal-themed number (and notice the Uday Shankar/Kalpana influence?) 
  • Bharosa (Hindi, 1963) - Choreography: Gopi Krishna! Full of drops, backbends, and hip and chest shimmies!
  • Sati Sulochana (Telugu, 1961) - "Jai Jai Jai" - Super filmy!
  • Makkalai Petra Maharasi (Tamil, 1957) - "Malliyakka Malliyakka"- Choreographer unknown. Cute folk number with crisp facial closeups. 
  • Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum (Tamil, 1956) - "Naama Aaduvathum" - Filmed in color!
  • Azaad (Hindi, 1955) - "O Balliye O Balliye" - Cute!
  • Malaikkallan (Tamil, 1954) - "O Ayye O Amma"
  • Aggi Ramudu (Telugu, 1954) - "Palla"

Concluding Thoughts...

Sujatha notes that Muthuswami Pillai's training of Sayee-Subbulakshmi was "an odd situation with the dance teacher spend his entire time teaching just two pupils." He taught a few others students here and there, but all of them soon gave up the dance form. His lack of noteworthy pupils beyond the sisters ended up being his "undoing," especially as "public taste" changed in the 1960s and 70s and Bharatanatyam dances in films were no longer in demand. With no students or film work, Muthuswami entered a slump. But in the mid 1970s, he entered a new phase of creativity in his dance career when European students from France traveled to India to learn exclusively from him. The students were earnest and sincere, their ballet backgrounds were an inspiration, and their bodies could handle his difficult choreography. 

The peak of Muthuswami's "French period" came in 1987 when Muthuswami met Dominique Delorme, the student "who would be to him what Kamala was to Vazhuvoor Ramiah Pillai." Dominique could handle whatever Muthuswami demanded of him and relished in the challenge. After rocky and negative initial reactions from the dance establishment, Muthuswai finally received the recognition he had craved culminating in a Sangeet Natak Akademi award and the "Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres" in France. In 2011, Sujatha wrote "these days I am often pleasantly surprised to spot his adavu-s in the performances of younger dancers and some of the seniors in Chennai. He has surely left a mark, but with none of his senior disciples working in Chennai, the style could see a slow fade-out."

But what about Sayee-Subbulakshmi? What happened to them, and why are so little remembered today? Kumari Kamala is rightfully remembered as ushering in a "cultural revolution in Bharatanatyam" (in Randor Guy's words) by bringing respectability to dance through her far-reaching performances in cinema as a sweet and talented girl from a "good family." But surely Sayee-Subbulakshmi, being just as cute and talented, also brought recognition to the form through cinema. From scholar Lakshmi Subramanian's insightful article on Sayee-Subbulakshmi and other reading between the lines while researching the sisters' family connections, I realized that they came from the traditional dance/music community and were not Brahmin outsiders to the tradition like Kamala. Was this a factor in the way the sisters were regarded or remembered?

As I read over this finished post, I notice that while I emphasize that Sayee-Subbulakshmi had exceptional natural-born talent, I write about them as if they were entirely products of their guru and later film choreographers with little agency and input of their own. I do wonder what aspects of their film dances were of their own emphasis and creation? Lakshmi Subramanian presents a fascinating perspective of the sisters after having watched some of their film dances. After noting that the South Indian film industry served as a "key factor in the survival and adaptation of those families and social groups who were associated with dance, music and performance including theatre and who did not immediately find a slot in the public domain of art music," she notes:
"[Sayee-Subbulakshmi] brought to their participation an individuated understanding of the form and idiom and experimented with its potential" and "the effortlessness with which they interpret the compositions and the fluidity of their moves demonstrate the sheer depth of the artistic inheritance they enjoyed."
She then concludes:
"My intention is to make a case for early films to serve as an archive of documenting taste and repertoire and of retrieving the agency of the performer in negotiating categories such as classical, traditional, modern, popular and folk. Without discounting the constraints imposed on performers by the needs of the audience, the discipline of the choreographer, I am nonetheless suggesting that the early performers were able to use the emerging medium of the film to demonstrate the parallel life of older genres and styles and to present their own  imagination of the present."
I am reminded of the recent guest post on my blog that discussed Muthuswami Pillai's devadasi-style choreography of Vyjayanthimala in Piya Milan compared with that in Chittoor Rani Padmini as a "defining authorial comment on the changes these key players brought to the culture of South Indian dance."However, Sayee-Subbulakshmi's film dances strike me as being creations consciously designed to present the modern "Bharatanatyam" that had emerged before and during that time period—very similar to the way that the Nattuvanar Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai presented his child prodigy Kamala in cinema. And given all that I have read about Muthuswai Pillai's style and thorough training, I naturally have wrote this post looking through that lens. I am curious what it is about Sayee-Subbulakshmi's film dances that causes Lakshmi to see them as first and foremost creations of the sisters themselves operating under small "constraints" like the choreographer or audience. I wonder what perspectives my readers and visitors have, especially those that are much more knowledgeable about Bharatanatyam than I am, particularly in assessing abhinaya and interpretive dance. Thoughts?

Coming up soon: Part 3, exploring more about Sayee-Subbulakshmi's relatives, their work in cinema, and more!

Sources:

"Kattumannar Koil Muthukumara Pillai (1874-60)" feature. Sruti. September 1993.
Prahlad, Prathibha. "An Aesthete and Innovator." Sruti. May 2011.
Sayee-Subbulakshmi (as told to Sruti). "Remembering our Dance Master" Sruti. May 2011.
Vijayaraghavan, Sujatha.  "The Teacher and the Taught: Muthuswami Pillai and His Disciples."
Vijayaraghavan, Sujatha. "From the Sruti Archives: A Marvel of Tradition and Talent - V.S. Muthuswami Pillai."Sruti. April 2011.
Vijayaraghavan, Sujatha. "From the Sruti Archives: V.S. Muthuswami Pillai - His Bani." Sruti. May 2011.

Further Reading and Stuff of Interest:

Remembering the Late Tara Chaudhri

$
0
0
I received the sad news this week that Tara Chaudhri passed away peacefully last weekend in Karachi, Pakistan. Back in March, I had featured two rare videos of Tara—one of her performing Bharatanatyam as part of the 1954 Indian Cultural Delegation to the U.S.S.R., Poland, and Czechoslovakia, and a second of her classically-inspired dance in the 1948 Tamil film Vedhala Ulagam. At the end of the post, I reviewed the small bits I had learned about her life from various books and online sources.

Since that post, I have tried to find a little more information about Tara. Given the news of her passing I thought this would be a nice time to feature it and celebrate Tara's life. In brief discussion with a niece of Tara and with Ashish Mohan Khokar, I learned that the correct spelling of Tara's last name is Chaudhri, and her family origins were in Punjab of Rajput descent. Tara was based in Lahore, and her sister Rani, who also learnt Kathak of the Punjab Gharana, was popular at that time. Coincidentally, Rani was once the love interest of dance scholar Mohan Khokar whose learning of dance to win Rani's unrequited affections left him with a love of dance for life.

But the biggest find about Tara was the 1949 article "Pavlova of the Punjab" (select "I agree" to view) from The Straits Times archived at one of my favorite resources for finding rare
articles on Indian dancers of the past, NewspaperSG. The article gushes heaps of praise on Tara's dance abilities starting from the title's perhaps hyperbolic comparison of her to legendary Russian ballerina Anna Pavlova! But most valuable of all is the timeline it gives of Tara's activities, dance forms, and locations—here are some excerpts:
“ 'Tara Chaudhri is, perhaps, even greater than Russia’s Anna Pavlova. Her sense of time and rhythm is perfect and her wonderful mastery of the various styles of Indian dancing puts her in a class by herself.' So observed the poet Vallathol, one of the foremost exponents of South Indian dancing, speaking about Tara Chaudhri and her art. Dark-eyed, fair and graceful of figure, Tara today is one of the foremost Indian classical dancers. 
Popularly known as the “Pavlova of the Punjab”, she has succeeded in winning the applause of both the connoisseur and the common man for her versatility and the glamour she infuses into her classical pieces. Her dances have an appeal both to the senses and the soul. Though she has modified the ancient styles to suit the requirements of the modern stage and audiences. Tara has not allowed either their cultural and traditional spirit, or their technique, to be compromised.
Tara Chaudhri was the “discovery” of her brother, A.R. Chaudhry, himself an accomplished dancer, a scholar and an art critic. Spotting her talents, he initiated Tara into the study of classical dancing at Lahore. Throughout her academic career in Lahore she gave many dance performances in schools and colleges. From the courtyards of these institutions to footlights of India’s leading stages, Tara danced her way up with steady steps.
After studying the north Indian styles of dancing—the “Kathak” and “Manipuri” (of Assam)—she went south in 1943 for advanced studies of South India’s ancient dance forms, the Bharata Natya and “Kathakali” (of Malabar) the initial training for which she had had from her brother-tutor. At the famous “Kerala Kalamandalam” (at Shoranur, in Cochin State), she mastered the “Kathakali” style of [unreadable]. She learnt the charming gesture language of “Bharata Natya” in the well-known Tanjore School. In 1946 she undertook an extensive tour of India and Ceylon as the partner of Ram Gopal. 
[...] During her recent performance specially arranged for the delegates to the Conference on Indonesia, at New Delhi, some of her own creations were highly appreciated. [...] One of Tara’s ambitions is to see the establishment of a Dance University in India, for the study and propagation of Indian classical and folk dancing in all its various forms. Such a university, she feels, will attract students of dancing not only from all over India but from all over the world.”
I also found quite a few mentions of Tara by eminent dancers/writers in various books and articles. In Sunil Kothari's books on Bharatanatyam and Kathak, he remembers Tara by name as a "renowned dancer" among others—like Ram Gopal, Shanta Rao, Rukmini Devi, and Mrinalini Sarabhai who trained in Bharatanatyam under the famous nattuvanar Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai; and like Kumudini Lakhia who trained in Kathak under Ashiq Hussain Khan in Punjab. V.A.K Ranga Rao is his article "Dance in Indian Cinema" listed Tara among the notable dancers who left "images of themselves in their shining youth" in cinema. But other than the Singapore newspaper article above, I've not found anymore than a brief mention of her in all my readings so far. I wonder why that is the case—perhaps she gave up dance after some time?

I would also love to know more about Tara's involvement with the dance scene in Pakistan in those times. Madame Azurie was another dancer of the period in Pakistan who also danced in films—Richard featured her in a blog post recently—and I wonder if she ever crossed paths professionally with Tara. And the subject of dance in Pakistan is begging for further research!

Last, in addition to this photo at the Encyclopaedia Brittanica online, here are some additional photos of Tara I was able to find.  The first two feature her with Ram Gopal. The one on the left is taken from Gopal's book Indian Dancing, and, curiously, he doesn't identify her—the caption only says "Ram Gopal as Shiva and a former pupil and partner as Parvati...".

 

"Tara Chaudri posing before the temple of Somnatpur, Mysore" (source)

Sayee and Subbulakshmi's Film-Industry Relatives: R. Padma, P.A. Periyanayaki, and Others (Part 3)

$
0
0
Sayee and Subbulakshmi's extended family had many members who were involved in the film industry at that time as actors, playback singers, and technicians behind the scenes. As we learned from the relatives that posted rare details on Richard's blog, the extended family was a closeknit group with connections and bonds in the industry that still last to this day. As I searched for more information to "flesh out" the details of these connections, I discovered that Sayee and Subbulakshmi were closely related to the singer-actresses P.A. Periyanayaki and R. Padma and to AVM Studios sound engineer V.S. Raghavan who did pathbreaking work in Tamil cinema dubbing and syncing. In a twist of fate, some of the films these relatives were involved in had dance direction by Muthuswami Pillai years before P.A. Periyanayaki introduced him to Sayee and Subbulakshmi. And to top it all, a present-generation relative is a talented singer who sang for a just-released Telugu film!

Continuing on from the Muthuswami Pillai series Part 1 and Part 2, here in Part 3, I want to highlight the little information I've been able to find about these relatives and feature some of R. Padma and P.A. Periyanayaki's on-screen singing and dancing performances, one of which is choreographed by Muthuswami Pillai!

My research for this post began when I found the following post on the Facebook account of Nithya Bayya, a Madras-born talented singer and cricketer in the San Francisco Bay Area:
"Came across this wonderful blog post regarding my aunts Sai-Subbalakshmi who were India's famous dance duo in 1940s. Read through the comments and discovered so many facts about my family that i didnt even know. They were actors, singers, sound engineers, cinematographers, dancers ..but most importantly they were pioneers who contributed so much to the world of cinema. I am proud to be a part of such a huge legacy. http://roughinhere.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/sai-subbulaxmi/  Thanks Raghavendra Ganesh, Mom and Dad & Ratchagan for your active participation in proividing so much information. It is also a very humbling experience to see how much they have achieved and how much we need to strive to do something remotely close to what they have done."(Facebook)

Further searching revealed comments Nithya had made on YouTube videos of Sabapathy: 
"My grandmother was R Padma, the heroine of the movie sabapathy. Interesting tidbit, her best friends NSK ayya TA Mathuram were godparents to my mom and were responsible for naming her as well. They named her mathuram too..."(YouTube)
"My grandmother R Padma is the heroine of this movie (the bride who is gettng married in this song). Periya Nayaki amma is my grand aunt. Always loved this song..."(YouTube)
In communications with Nithya, I discovered that R. Padma was Sayee's mother-in-law! R. Padma had married Raghavan V.S. and had five children.  The oldest child, Santaram V.S., married Sayee; middle child Mathuram Babai had a daughter, Nithya; and the youngest child R. Sudha had a son, Raghavendra Ganesh.

After closely reviewing the comments from Richard's blog and the information from Nithya, I've not been able to nail down exactly how this group connects with P.A. Periyanayaki and Subbulakshmi. Nithya describes P.A. Periyanayaki as her grand aunt, Sayee's relatives note P.A. Periyanayaki was Sayee and Subbulakshmi's mother, and Sujatha Vijayaraghavan in Sruti says P.A. Periyanayaki was the aunt and cousin of Sayee and Subbulakshmi. In any case, whether through marriage or blood, the extended family was clearly very close and active in the film industry. And that activity continues today with Nithya who sang a song in the Telugu movie Kiss which just released last month. Here she is being interviewed on a Bay Area show about her cricket and singing activities—she is warm and engaging, and I wish her well!

R. Padma

According to Randor Guy, R. Padma was a "Lux Soap" model who "was active in Tamil cinema during the 1940's, but never made it to the top" and "is barely remembered today." The "Blast from the Past" and related articles at The Hindu list Padma as an actress in: Vaayaadi(1940), Sabapathy (1941), Prabhavathi(1942), Aayiram Thalaivaangi Apoorva Chintamani(1947), Geeta Gandhi(1949), Devamanohari(1951), and as an actress and singer in En Manaivi(1942).

Sabapathy (1941) - "Naan Angae"- R. Padma played "the hero's educated wife who teaches her husband English" in this film. In the song "Naan Angae" below, she performs a dance! Sabapathy was among the very first films Muthuswami Pillai choreographed for. I was surprised to find that the film title cards credited dance direction to not only V.S. Muthuswami Pillai but also Meenakshisundaram Pillai! This must be Vaitheeswarankoil Meenakshisundaram Pillai, Muthuswami's guardian and the person who first introduced Muthuswami to film choreography through his famous students Yogam and Mangalam (see Part One for more information). Perhaps Sabapathi was sort of an "apprentice" film where Muthuswami learned the ropes under Meenakshisundaram. The dance is fascinating considering how early it was filmed. It is presented not for a male patron or courtly admirers but rather for elders/prospective family members (?) in a respectable, domestic setting. Padma's costume is full of gorgeous details, patterns, and designs, and it has a modern sewn-in pyjama fan. I find Padma's dance abilities lacking and she is quite stiff, but the number is a wonderfully-preserved item of historical interest.


En Manaivi (Tamil, 1942) - "Padanathaip Parkap Parkap Pasi"- In this cute song with vocals by Padma herself, she plays a village woman who is amazed by the music she mysteriously heard while at the beach and sings a song about it and the modern marvels of science. The mysterious music at the beach actually comes from the loudspeaker pole seen at :50, which Randor Guy notes was a real loudspeaker in the Madras High Court Beach that "was a novelty and many people flocked there just to listen to music and sounds coming out seemingly from nowhere" (TheHindu).



P.A. Periyanayaki

P.A. Periyanayaki was one of the famous playback singers in South Indian cinema in the 1940s and 1950s. Randor Guy writes, "Hailing from Panrutti, a small town, some hundred miles from Madras, Periyanayaki was blessed with a ringing, bold, melodious voice. Her musical talent helped her make a foray into films when she was 10 in C. V. Raman’s Urvashiyin Kadhal and she gradually pushed her way up mostly in small but singing roles. She attracted attention in T. R. Raghunath’s Prabhavati. Her big moment came when Meiyappan sent for her for Sri Valli."

In Tamil talkies up through the early 1940s, stars had to be able to both act and sing live on camera, and the most popular singing stars of the period were M.K. Thyagaraja Bagavathar (MKT, the "first superstar of South Indian cinema") and P.U. Chinnappa1. As technology advanced, the concepts of dubbing and synching sound slowly came into use. P.A. Periyanayaki is sometimes popularly remembered as the first playback singer in Tamil cinema, but that credit actually goes to Lalitha Venkatraman in the 1938 film Nandakumar (1938)1,2. But P.A. Periyanayaki could be considered the first "post-synchronization" singer in Tamil cinema and certainly the first popular one. When AVM Studios founder A.V. Meiyappan recalled the prints of Sri Valli (1945), replaced Rukmini's voice with Periyanayaki (who had to match her singing to the already recorded visual image!), and rushed the revised prints out to theaters 1,3, Periyanayaki's songs were a huge success and she "emerged as a much sought-after playback singer" and the film "set the trend of playback singing in the industry"3,4.

Interestingly, the innovative chief of AVM's sound department and the person whom A.V. Meiyappan consulted with to replace Rukmini's songs in Sri Valli was none other than V. Srinivasa Raghavan (V.S. Raghavan), who as noted above was R. Padma's husband and the father-in-law of Sayee! Raghavan had trained "under the legendary audiographer C.E. Biggs of the Gemini studios" and had pioneered the "first dubbed film in the history of the Tamil/Indian cinema" when he mixed in a Tamil dialogue track specifically written to match the lips of the Kannada artists in Harishchandra for the dubbed Tamil version released in 19441.

The "Blast from the Past" and related articles at The Hindu (mostly penned by the fabulous walking encyclopaedia Randor Guy) lists P.A. Periyanayaki in the cast of Utthama Puthran (1940), Prabhavati (1942), Vichitra Vanitha (1947), Krishna Bhakthi (1948), and Geeta Gandhi (1949), and as at least one of the playback singers for Sri Valli(1945), Vichitra Vanitha (1947), Gnanasoundari(1948), Prasanna (1950, Malayalam), Kerala Kesari (1951, Malayalam), Vanasundari(1951), Singari(1951), Ulagam (1953), and Marumagal(1953). She also is said to have played the role of Naradar in Rukmangadhan (1946). Online folks have said she sang for some Telugu films like Beedalapatlu (1950), Ammalakkalu (1953), and Oka Talli Pillalu (1953). And it seems widely known that she sang as herself on screen in Sabapathy (1941). But we also know from the film credits that she did playback for Mallaikkalan (1954) and Telugu remake Aggi Ramudu (according to friend of the blog Gaddeswarup)—presumably for Sayee and Subbulakshmi's numbers! I have wondered if Periyanayaki sang for more of their film dances but couldn't find any mention. P.A. Periyanayaki also had a sister P.A. Rajamani, who sang songs in Bhaktha Gowri (1941) and was in the cast of Prabhavathi (1942).

Sabapathy (Tamil, 1941)- "Sundari Nee"- In this number, a wedding celebration for R. Padma's character (who can be seen as the "blushing bride" a few times), P.A. Periyanayaki gives a vocal performance as herself—I love everything about her from her striking presence and powerful voice to the brooch on her sari pallu. She commands your attention! According to a program invitation card that flashes on the screen before this song, the other female musicians are C.V. Dhanalakshmi on the fiddle and V. Neelambari on the mridangam. Isn't it refreshing to see a live performance on film, especially after being subjected to so much horrendous fake-veena playing on screen! What beautiful preservation of these women's talents on film.


What a beautiful legacy these men and women have created for us audiovisually on screen. In Lakshmi Subramanian's words, these "films give us some glimpses into a world that does not otherwise leave any trace."

Last, I will close with this thumbnail I just found of a beautiful, high-quality image of Sayee-Subbulakshmi in the film Naya Sansar (1959)--click on the image to link to the full version at Osianama, a new and promising online Indian digital archive with a great Indian cinema collection:




Sources Cited:
1. Pillai, Swarnavel Eswaran. "Chapter 3: AVM and Gemini Studios: The Dravidian Movement and the Competing Narratives."Tamil Cinema and the Major Madras Studios 1940-1957. PhD Diss.
2. Guy, Randor. "Blast from the Past: Nandakumar 1938."The Hindu.
3. Guy, Randor. "Blast from the Past: Sri Valli 1945."The Hindu.
4. Vasudevan, K.V. "Manorama in Flashback."

Two More Busby Berkeley-Inspired Top Shots in 1930s Indian Film Dances

$
0
0
In my post last year about Dance in Early Indian Cinema, I had marveled at the technical advancements in Indian film dances from the 1930s like that in Raitu Bidda (1939), Chandrasena (1935), and Amrit Manthan (1934)—the last of which featured overhead camera "top shots" inspired by the famous Hollywood choreographer Busby Berkeley that frame the dancers in novel geometric patterns.

Recently I happened onto two more examples of the top shot technique in 1930s Indian film dance: Rajput Ramani (Hindi, 1936) and Rambayin Kaathal (Tamil, 1939)! This suggests the technique must have been fairly popular in Indian cinema at that time, and it's easy to see why it was so. Moving the camera away from the static, theatrical frontal position must have been awe inspiring in those days (and it still is today!)

Rajput Ramani (Hindi, 1936) - "Ayi Sakhi Kya Bahar" - Starting at :30, the number begins with an overhead shot of the hands of a circle of dancing women. The camera slowly rises, and then we see a level shot inside same dancing circle that gives the viewer a frame of reference. The number advances at 1:05 when the women individually spin inward and outward, and at 2:10 the extensions of the women's clothing as they spin create pinwheels! Like Amrit Manthan, Rajput Ramaniwas directed by V. Shantaram and produced by Prabhat Films, a renowned studio in its day known for its talented art department. Aren't the cuts to the audience watching the dance performance interesting. Their view is quite boring, but our view, thanks to the possibilities the camera creates, is mesmerizing!


Rambayin Kaathal (Tamil, 1939—not 1956!) - According to Randor Guy, this successful film centered around the heavenly dancer Ramba and her trials. I adore this courtly group dance number featuring six young women! The emphasis on the sounds of the ghungroo bells, the jewelry and arm ornaments, the choreography—everything about the number looks very old and quite different from the film dances seen in the late 1940s and onwards. My favorite part begins at 1:17 where we see a routine group dance number performed on top of a design on the court floor. At 1:46, the girls start to move in a more complex pattern and then at 1:50—bam! The Busby Berkeley-inspired top-shot appears and suddenly the dance is transformed into beautiful circle and weaving patterns as the dancers move on top of the same floor design pattern. Once again, a dance technique possible only on film!



Also, I found a few more very vintage-looking 1930s film dances (but with no top shots)—from Rambayin Kaathal"Ithanai Naalaai" and the solo court dance "Jeya Ranjitha," and another solo court dance in Singahad(1933).

To close, here are two video compilations of some great Busby Berkeley film choreography! Unfortunately embedding doesn't work: video one, video two. Happy viewing!

Muthukumara Pillai On Screen in Kannika (1947), and Other Nattuvanars in Indian Cinema

$
0
0
Thanks to twoYouTubers who have uploaded songs from the 1947 Tamil film Kannika in the past few months, Bharatanatyam dance history aficionados can now witness on screen the nattuvanar Kattumannar Koil Muthukumara Pillai (1874-1960, also known as Muthukumaran or Muthukumarappa, of the village Kattumannarkoil aka Mannargudi or Kattumannargudi) at the age of 73 playing the role of a nattuvanar in the song "Natanam Adinar":

Muthukumara Pillai can be seen at 1:14, 1:58, closeup at 2:55, and 3:51 onward
(the lower quality version includes 2 more seconds where he begins to speak, but it's cut off!!)


How do I know it's him? I had read a while back in the September 1993 Sruti magazine feature on Muthukumara Pillai (for brevity, MKP) that when he was in Coimbatore from 1944-1947 teaching exercises and dances to young boys at a drama company, he "came in contact with Pakshiraja Studios and trained the proprietor Sriramulu Naidu's wife Saroja for her lead role in the film 'Kannika' [and] Muthukumara Pillai himself too made a brief appearance in the film." When I watched the recently-uploaded songs and compared the nattuvanar's appearance with known photos of Muthukumara Pillai, it was clearly him! Compare these stills from Kannika with a photo of MKP that I featured in my post on Muthuswami Pillai and that must have been taken in the late 1930s which were the years the young man on the right, Muthuswami Pillai, trained with MKP.

Left: Kannika  Right: Muthukumara Pillai
This Kannika footage is incredible because Muthukumara Pillai belonged to the oldest generation of nattuvanars whose hereditary artistic practice was discovered in the twentieth century transformation of what we today call Bharatanatyam. What's more, he along with his contemporary Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai (also known as Pandanallur Meenakshisundaram Pillai, from Pandanallur village, for brevity MSP) are often remembered today as the two top-ranking gurus and nattuvanars of their generation who trained most of the first non-hereditary Bharatanatyam dancers who spread and popularized the art form far and wide. The two of them each trained such legends as Ram Gopal, Rukmini Devi Arundale, Mrinalini Sarabhai, and Kamala Lakshman.

Left to Right: MKP, MSP [Khokar]
Because the first generation nattuvanars (first meaning in terms of modern Bharatanatyam) born in the 1860s-70s were already in their 50s and 60s by the time they got involved in teaching during the "dance revival" of the 1930s, there are many accounts of MSP's and MKP's students getting initial instruction from them but then being referred to younger nattuvanars of the second or third generations. The second generation of nattuvanars born in the late 1880s-1900s who entered adulthood before the dance revival included Chokkalingam Pillai, Kandappa Pillai, Kittappa Pillai, K. Ponnaya Pillai, and Thiruvalaputhur Swaminath Pillai. A common transfer guru for Muthukumara Pillai was his distant relative Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai, a part of the third generation of nattuvanars born in the 1910s-1920s and beyond who came of age during or after the dance revival began including K. P. Kittappa Pillai, KN Dandayudhapani Pillai, Kanchipuram Ellappa Pillai, and Muthuswami Pillai (who trained with MKP) as well as those nontraditional/nonhereditary outsiders who became well-rounded artists learning nattuvangam, Bharatanatyam, and music around the 1930s and beyond like Adyar Lakshman, Udupi Lakshminarayanan, CV Chandrasekhar, and VP Dhananjayan.

To contextualize the footage of MKP in Kannika in terms of time, it was filmed years after MKP entered the burgeoning dance scene and taught his most notable students in the 1930s and early 1940s. Rukmini Devi Arundale, MK Saroja, Ramgopal, and Mrinalini Sarabhai learned from him during this time, and he taught at institutions such as Ramgopal's in Bangalore and at Rukmini Devi Arundale's Kalakshetra from 1938-39 where he was "first regular Bharatanatayam guru" who did not come and go. Kamala Narayanan (aka Kamala Lakshman, Baby Kamala), the beloved dancer of this blog, learned all her Bharatanatyam basics from KMP after her family moved next door to where he was staying. Though KMP was apparently past his prime at this time, he taught Kamala a full but condensed margam and conducted her debut arangetram in 1941. When KMP was no longer able to keep up with Kamala's hectic performance schedule, he sent her in 1942 to Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai whom she became famous and blossomed under. I wish I could find a photo of Kamala learning from KMP!

Jhanak Khendry with MKP (Source: [11])
What had not happened yet at the time of Kannika's filming and release was MKP's teaching activities in the late-1940s through the mid-1950s where he taught at Mrinalini Sarabhai's school Darpana in Ahmedabad and soon retired to his Kattumanarkoil village where he taught the American exponent Nala Najan and later Jhanak Khendry. KMP looks aged and frail in his appearance in Kannika which is quite a contrast compared with photos from his earlier teaching years in which he has a solid, athletic build and was known for demonstrating adavus to his students. It's also a stark contrast to a photo of him with Jhanak Khendry (left) which I assume was taken in 1955 or 1956 when Khendry learned from MKP. Considering that MKP's health and eyesight is said to have declined significantly his last years, I wonder if that photo might have been taken much earlier.

Muthukumar Pillai and his Tiruvalur/Kattumanar Koil style and contributions to the history of Bharatanatyam are often overlooked and given much less prominence compared to Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai whose Pandanallur/Thanjavur style of Bharatanatyam descended directly from the famed Thanjavur Quartet. I've read of MSP referred to as the "greatest nattuvanar,""nonpareil natyacharya and dance celebrity," and even the "father of Bharatanatyam." He was an important and early part of Rukmini Devi Arundale's training and teaching at her Kalakshetra institution (doing both before MKP) and had an impressive pedigree for those concerned with that at that time.

Various reasons are offered for why Muthukumar Pillai's contributions to Bharatanatyam are so overlooked--he didn't have male lineage to the tradition and was an anomaly in his family, most of his students only became famous when they later learned from other teachers, and since he was a sanyasi who had renounced materiality and attachments he moved frequently from place to place and was not interested in fame, fortune, or self-promotion. According to his student Jhanak Khendry, MKP "always said that art was like a river which did not belong to anyone and that it kept flowing and every one could drink its water. Art, he emphasised, should be shared and passed on." A critical study of any dance's history often reveals that there are numerous dancers and contributions lost to popular memory and historiography and the fragility of oral history. Gaston notes in her book that K. Lalita (1918-1992) was a Brahmin woman who studied Bharatanatyam with KMP in 1931 at age 13 in Madras and opened up her own dance school called Sarasvati Gana Nilayam. I've read a couple other instances of Brahmin women learning dance even earlier than this--anecdotes seemingly subsumed by the simplistic notion that Rukmini Devi Arundale was the first Brahmin woman to learn Bharatanatyam/classical dance.

MKP Closeup
What I love most of all of the Kannika clip is seeing MKP's smile. All of the extant photos of him I've seen feature him looking very austere and serious with no smile, making accounts of his great abhinaya hard to visualize. But in Kannika, we get to see him briefly flash a smile and tap the beat while dressed impeccably (I'm curious about the significance of what he's wearing.). I have begged the uploader to please upload the scene after the song ends so that we can see the full context and hear MKP speak. I will come back and update this post if and when that scene is available--keep fingers crossed!

Hemamalini Arni and Other Dances in Kannika

The film Kannika is well-known to fans of the Travancore Sisters (Padmini, Lalitha, and Ragini) because it has one of Padmini and Lalitha's earliest film dances (released before their dances in the earlier-made-but-later-released 1948 film Kalpana) which has been on YouTube for a while on and off by other uploaders. Now that the other songs from the film are available, we can see that Kannika features a number of beautiful dances seemingly forgotten by repositories like Randor Guy whose writeup up the film only mentioned the Lalita-Padmini dance choreographed by Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai.

Hemamalini Arni Age 8 (source)
I was delighted to discover that the girl dancing in the "Natanam Adinar" song and playing the character Kannika in her youth in the film is a 13-year old Hemamalini Arni (nee Vijayaraghavan) who seems to have been one of those dancers like MK Saroja who likely would have made it big in or danced in more films had marriage not ended those ambitions. According to a darling website about Arni produced by her husband years ago (that features rare photos of Balasaraswati, Ram Gopal, and others!), Hemamalini Arni sung her own vocals in the "Natanam Adinar" song, something she was known for doing for her own real-life dance performances. She was also the namesake for the famous 1960s+ actress Hema Malini whose mother admired the dances of Arni, the daughter of a family friend. While Arni studied Bharatanatyam for a long time under Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai, strangely, despite MKP playing the nattuvanar on screen in Kannika, the title credits of the film name Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai, Arni's real-life guru, as being responsible for the dances.

While MKP apparently didn't choreograph the dance song he was featured in, he is said to have trained Sriramulu Naidu's wife for her lead role in the film. Sruti identifies her as Saroja, but she is referred to by Randor Guy and others as M. S. Sarojini. Seeing the dances now online and how much M.S. Sarojini dances, I assume she had zero dance training and MKP had the job of getting her to a basic level of proficiency which was likely a difficult task. Speaking about how he handled similar situations choreographing for films, Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai said in an interview for his feature in Sruti that for those who had never learned dance, despite his teaching only as much as was needed and making it easy, it still "would take four to five months for a performer to learn foot movements, hand gestures, facial expressions and the mudras" before he would "add the finer touches which would render the dance more appealing." Four to five months for film songs! No wonder MKP looks a bit haggard. Here are two examples of the fruits of his labors:

"Nadaraajan Un Thiru Nadam Kandu Tev" - The rare male dancer on screen! He dances initially with M.S. Sarojini before sitting to watch her. He looks to be T.E. Varadan whom Randor Guy identifies as the hero of the film and a science graduate in real life. Look at his graceful arms and handsome face--he should have been a dancer! Did MKP train him as well, I wonder? I was struck by the very deep half-seated "araimandi" M.S. Sarojini does at 1:37 and throughout the song--something I bet KMP insisted upon and something I rarely see in films. Pity her Theermanam Adavu is quite terrible!

Dancing begins :30

"Yaaro Vanthu En Iru Kann Poththinaar" - In the first half of this song, M.S. Sarojini performs gentle upper-body movements and simple abhinaya. 


Last, not to be missed is a super-flexible snake dance by a white chick (I assume) who must've been a well-known, exotic performer of that time reminiscent of the "rubber dancers" of the era.

Other Nattuvanars on Screen

Surprising it is that in Indian film classical dances we get to see so few prominent Bharatanatyam nattuvanars on screen, though it's possible I've missed some over the years when I watched film dances before knowing what certain nattuvanars looked like or assuming the accompanists were just actors. Other than MKP's appearance, I've not read any instances of any other first or second generation nattuvanars participating in films either on screen or behind the camera, which further bolsters the rarity of seeing MKP on the silver screen let alone choreographing for films. At one time I thought I had evidence of MSP choreographing for cinema--Sruti magazine's feature on Muthuswami Pillai said that "the sisters Yogam and Mangalam were the famous duo taught by Meenakshisundaram Pillai at Madras...they entered film with their guru choreographing and directing their dances," but further reading revealed why it's important to get the full names of nattuvanars--the article was referring to Vaitheeswarankoil Meenakshisundaram Pillai, the appointed guardian of Muthuswami Pillai, not Pandanallur Meenakshisundaram Pillai! My hopes were dashed. :)

The third generation nattuvanars are the group which has some of their images preserved in cinema. Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai gets some brief screen time in the 1954 Indian Films Division documentary Bharata Natyam featuring his prodigy Kumari Kamala--I didn't point it out in my original post on the doc, but the nattuvanar seen at 5:21 for a few seconds surely must be him. It's surprising that Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai wasn't seen in more film dances given how prolific he was, but the website of the Vazhuvoorar School of Classical Dance and Music has featured some rare photos of him on the sets of his dance choreographies that I featured on my companion Tumblr (not used much these days!)

VRP seen at 5:21


In Jean Renoir's 1951 co-production The River filmed in India, KN Dhandayudhapani Pillai not only choreographed Radha Burnier's dance but is also seen on screen performing nattuvangam alongside his younger brother Dakshinamoorthy on the mridangam. Props to fellow dance detective Ragothaman of the Bharatanatyam and the Worldwide Web blog for sourcing this information. The film quality and lighting are simply delectable and let us see KNDP in much better quality than most other examples.

KNDP seen at :19


V.P. Dhananjayan danced on screen and then performed nattuvangam in Kann Sivandhal Mann Sivakkum (Tamil, 1983) which I previously posted details about and which deserves to be embedded here, again, since it's been a while...


The late Adyar K. Lakshman composed among the best Bharatanatyam in Indian cinema in the Kannada films Subba Sastri (1966) and Hamsa Geethe (1975) which I previously posted about in detail, though I still haven't tracked down his dance in the film Ananda Tandavam (Tamil, 1987). Kanchipuram Ellappa was said in Sruti magazine to have choreographed one dance in Konjum Salangai (Tamil, 1962), while in another interview Kamala claimed she choreographed all of that film's dances herself. The late Udupi Laxminarayanan was heavily involved in film choreography (becoming Sivaji Ganesan's favorite teacher and teaching Prabhu Deva and choreographing his dances in Kaadhalan!) and danced on screen in quite a few films. One example I had found before has been taken down, and I haven't found other examples of his classical-oriented dances or appearances in films, unfortunately. According to Sruti magazine, Udupi vocalized the jathis for Raj Kapoor's humorous enactment of a nattuvanar for Padmini's dance in Mera Naam Joker (Hindi, 1970). VS Muthuswami Pillai choreographed for many film dances as I've extensively covered on this blog including Vyjayanthimala's best film Bharatanatyam as well as the thrilling dances of Sayee-Subbulakshmi, but I never saw him on screen.

In more recent cinema, US Krishna Rao played a nattuvanar in Dance Like a Man (2003) featuring Shobana and can be seen at 2:24 in the scene compilation below. He and his wife Chandrabhaga Devi were among the first Brahmin couples to learn Bharatanatyam in the 1940s and did much to popularize the form in Karnataka. According to Sruti and The Hindu, US Krishna Rao choreographed for two films: Shola Aur Shabnam (Hindi, 1961), a bad experience, and Paapa Punya (Kannada, 1971) which must be this slow-paced home dance at 1:13:24.

US Krishna Rao seen at 2:24

Thus ends another contribution to my long-suffering and long-coming Remembering Film Choreographers post series! I'm excited for an in-draft post about Kuchipudi dance in Telugu cinema and the contributions of Kuchipudi gurus, hopefully coming somewhat soon...:)

Sources and Great Reading:
  1. Academy of Bharatanatyam [Rare photos from founder TK Narayan's dance school site, student of MKP]
  2. Gaston, Anne-Marie. Bharata Natyam from Temple to Theatre. 1996. [Especially "Banis of Bharata Natyam" chapter].
  3. Gopal, Ram. Rhythm in the Heavens: An Autobiography. 1957.
  4. Khokar, Ashish Mohan. "Vidwan Guru Muthukumaran Pillai: Stalwart and Saint of Bharatanatyam" Narthaki. 2009.
  5. Khokar, Ashish Mohan. "Kattumannarkoil."Shanmukha: Banis of Bharatanatyam and Recent Trends. 2010.
  6. Knight, Douglas. "Select Biographies."Balasaraswati: Her Art and Life. 2010.
  7. Kothari, Sunil. "Guruparampara."Bharata Natyam: Indian Classical Dance Art. 2001.
  8. Kumar, Ranee. "Grace and poise personified [Guru Hemamalini Arni]."The Hindu. 2012.
  9. Seshan, A. "The Rise and Fall of the Nattuvanar."Narthaki. 2008. 
  10. Sruti Magazine. Articles on Kamala Narayanan (Kumari Kamala). Issues 45/46 and 48. 1988.
  11. Sruti Magazine. Articles on Muthukumara Pillai. Volume 108. 1993. [Excellent read featuring the most complete details about his life and students.]
  12. Sundaram, BM. "Towards a Genealogy of Some Thanjavur Natyacharyas and their Kinsfolk."Sangeet Natak. 1997.
  13. Ramnarayan, Gowri. "In pursuit of divinity [M.K. Saroja]."The Hindu. 2009.
  14. Ramnarayan, Gowri. "Where are the Master Gurus? [Nattuvanars]."The Hindu. 1998. 

Swapna Sundari Dancing in Kissaa Kursee Kaa (Hindi, 1977)

$
0
0
Today I was alerted to Anuj Kumar's days-old The Hindu article about the 1977 Hindi film Kissaa Kursee Kaawhich reveals that the director used classical dance forms "performed by Swapna Sundari to anchor the narrative." Swapna Sundari! I always enjoy finding examples of famous dancers performing in cinema, and learning that the well known Kuchipudi and Vilasini Natyam dancer Swapna Sundari danced in a film was certainly surprising!

It's a controversial film for Swapna to have involved herself in. A scathing satirical and symbolic work spoofing the Indira Gandhi government, Kissaa Kursee Kaa (Tale of a Throne, aka Kissa Kursi Ka) was made during the turbulent period known as “the Emergency” when India's government declared a state of emergency ushering in a dark period in India’s modern history which saw basic freedoms and rights suspended. The print we see on YouTube is actually a remake of the original that was banned and never released and had all its prints destroyed by the government. After the Emergency was lifted, director Amrit Nahata reshot and released the film in 1977 (while The Hindu article and YouTube video list 1978, I've listed 1977 which is the date the Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema and many other articles list). The film has been in the news recently again after Nahata's son has demanded the original prints be returned or compensation be made. I would love to hear what Swapna's experience was in taking part in this film, but I've not been able to find any other mentions of it.

Raghavan?
While the dances are disappointingly underwhelming and brief (what a let down!), they are notable not only for being an uncommon example of South Indian dance being performed by trained dancers in a Hindi film but also featuring what looks like Kuchipudi dance movements. The male dancer is another rare sight whose identity I'm not sure of—according to a friend's translation, the film credits list Sudharshan Dheer and Raghavan as possibilities, and since the male dancer looks nothing like the late famous Kathak dancer Sudharshan Dheer, my guess is he must be Raghavan. I bet Sudharshan Dheer assisted with choreography especially the Kathak parts.

The film kicks off with a group dance starting at 1:15 led by Swapna and Raghavan, and so much about the nritta/pure dance screams "Kuchipudi" to me. The hand movements at 2:30 are unquestionably Kuchipudi, and the first leg movements by Swapna at 1:44 as well as the duo's series of movements starting at 2:50 looks very much taken from or inspired by Kuchipudi's movement vocabulary. Three other dance forms make a brief appearance in the film: at 4:32 we are treated to a unthrilling Kathak dance, at 39:31 we see a more traditional nattuvanar-dancer setup (with Hindi filmi music) featuring Swapna's bouncy Kuchipudi movements and Raghavan's declarations intercut with scenes of rats, at 1:08:22 we have another example of Manipuri dance misrepresentation in cinema intercut with scenes of Shabana Azmi's suffering, and the final dance seen at 1:27:58 is a folk number. Not having English subtitles, the way these dances "anchor the narrative" is lost on me. The film's editing is really abrupt and the technical quality quite poor, though in a couple scenes like 1:20:40 I was reminded of the far superior and somewhat similar 1977 film Shatranj Ke Khilari.


The Dravidian-style temple prominent in the background of the first dance in the film follows the same signaling of other Hindi film songs featuring a South Indian dance, like Abhinetri and New Delhi. The scene is clearly shouting "I am South Indian!" I'm sure that the fact that specifically Kuchipudi movements are being portrayed here and there was lost on most audiences.

Abhinetri, New Delhi

A few other screenshots from the film:

 

Swapna Sundari (also spelled Swapnasundari) learned Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi in her youth and debuted on the dance scene when she was 15 as a last-minute replacement for Yamini Krishnamurthy, and by the mid-70s she had formed her own dance troupe and was performing solo as well. Her inclusion in Kissaa Kursee Kaa suggests that by the late-1970s she was a well-known dance entity in New Delhi. It's lovely to see her so young dancing on film—Swapna reminds me of the actress Bhanupriya with her enormous eyes and beauty. These film dances while likely a one-off experience for Swapna had a bit of family precedent—her mother had been an assistant music director for Gemini Studios in the 1940s.

Swapna in 2012 (credit: IANS)
In the 1980s, Swapna rose to fame as a Bharatanatyam but also most prominently a Kuchipudi dancer and established a Kuchipudi Dance Centre in 1982 in New Delhi, and in the past twenty years she has become synonymous with Vilasini Natyam, the name she and Dr. Arudra gave to the art of female Telugu temple and court dancers which she has made her mission to preserve and propagate. She also famously reinstated dance at the Ranganathaswamy Temple in Hyderabad in the 90s. She was involved in two documentaries released in 1998—as the subject of the Indian Films Division documentary Dreamer (which I can't find any clips of online) and as part of the Kuchipudi Revisited documentary directed by Yamini Krishnamurthy that I previously wrote about on the blog. The prestigious Padham Bhushan award was granted to her in 2003 in recognition of her efforts toward Andhra's dance forms. Swapna's official website seems to have been down for some time, but you can see an archived half-finished version from 2011 courtesy of the Wayback Machine.

This discovery of Swapna Sundari's film dance is timed perfectly since I have a post on Kuchipudi dance in cinema in the works. It has been for some time, so I'm glad to have this post to be able to let my readers know I am still around after a long hiatus! :) Kuchipudi and Telugu dance history has proved to be very complex, contested, and fascinating...

New 1950s Footage at Net-Film: Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai, E.V. Saroja, Chitrasena, Vajira, and Padma Subrahmanyam!

$
0
0
Today I thought, "I wonder if Net-Film has digitized any new videos featuring South Asian dance since I last visited," and they most certainly HAVE—including nattuvangam/training footage of Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai, Bharatanatyam by E.V. Saroja, and Kandyan creative dance by Chitrasena and Vajira!

I had discovered the online Russian digital film/newsreel archive Net-Film back in 2013 when I posted about discovering rare video of the dancers Tara Chaudhri, Guru Gopinath, and Indrani Rahman at the site. Net-Film seems to have since expanded its collection beyond just Russia's Central Studio of Documentary Films, the "oldest and largest film studio in the former Soviet Union," to also include many other studios equaling storage of "about 50,000 films" that are being regularly digitized. Since Net-Film is aimed at providing paid licensing for its content, all the video clips are small, full-length "previews" which have the running timestamp prominently and annoyingly displayed at the bottom to aid requests for exact footage segments. Net-Film also seems to have updated the backend technology and usability of the site and it is no longer glitchy.

The Morning in India (1956, Russian)

This documentary film "about the history of India, struggle for independence, and present of the country" has the rare finds in reels 6 and 7 which focus on Tamil Nadu and West Bengal.

In Reel 6, after shots of a temple in Kanchipuram, a dance segment begins at 1:35 with a close up of E.V. Saroja's face followed byher Bharatanatyam performance to the song Natanam Adinar! When I first watched the video I thought she looked so familiar but couldn't figure out who she was. The video description identifies the dancer as "Kumari Sarraj" (young woman Sarraj) which I realized could be a Russian mishearing of the name "Saroja." Reading through the Sruti feature on Ramaiah Pillai to refresh my memory of the students he trained made the connection—E.V. Saroja (1936-2006), of course, it looks just like her! I had always assumed E.V. Saroja only trained from Ramaiah Pillai for films like many other actress-dancers of that time, but she was also a serious student of his and "made a mark on the stage as well as in cinema" whichthis footage provides visual evidence of. EV Saroja had entered films in the early 1950s, and the footage was filmed when she was about 19-20 years old and beginning her string of hits in Tamil and Telugu cinema that lasted through the early 1960s.



While the footage of E.V. Saroja is wonderful, it's the rare footage of Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillaistarting at 2:54 in Reel 6 that is most thrilling for its rarity. We got to see a visual glimpse of him in the nattuvanar role briefly in the 1954 Indian films division documentary "Bharata Natyam," but here we see him in the role not only more extensively but also walking, smiling, reciting the rhythmic solkattu syllables, tapping the wooden tattukazhi, and demonstrating hand gestures, eye and eyebrow movements, and abhinaya for a group of young girls! It's a short but incredible glimpse of his artistic skills and brings him to life and helps us see him fully as his students once did. The scene ends much too quickly at 3:50. How I wish the filmmakers had also included footage of him physically demonstrating full-body movements!



Update: After I published the post I discovered that the girl smiling at 3:17 and then dancing in the back is a young Padma Subrahmanyam! Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai was her early guru, and the video was filmed the same year he conducted Padma's debut arangetram performance in Bharatanatyam. Based on reports that she was born in 1943, she would be about 13 years old in the Net-Film video. This must be the earliest recorded dance footage of Padma!

Left: Padma (padmadance.com), Right: The Morning in India

The Morning in India
features other dance styles as well. In Reel 6 at 9:20, we see artists making Manipuri dance costumes followed by a scene of Manipuri dance, and Reel 7 begins with some simple outdoor Rabindra Nritya dance. Reel 7 also features Rabindranath Tagore himself singing "the anthem of India" on screen starting at 5:35—this is possibly quite rare footage of Tagore.


The Art of Friends (1957, Russian) 

Likethe Masters of the Indian Art footage I featured previously, The Art of Friends is a collection of performances, this time from the "VI World Youth and Student Festival" held in Moscow in 1957 to showcase artistic performances from representatives of different countries. The most stunning find is the footage of the Sri Lankan dancers Chitrasena and his wife Vajira along with presumably the Chitrasena Dance Company—I have the impression that footage of them from this time period is quite a rare thing to behold. In Reel 1 starting at 6:11, we see a solo male dancer, then a group of male dancers followed by a Chitrasena-Vajira duet at 6:51. Vajira's distinctive nose shape is unmistakable. (Note: There is also 40 seconds of additional footage of the group dance starting at 8:25 in the film At a Marvellous Feast about the festival.)






I had written about the Sri Lankan dancer Chitrasena briefly in my post "Bharatanatyam in Sri Lankan Sinhalese Films and in Sri Lanka" and more in my post about seeing the Nrityagram-Chitrasena Dance Company Odissi-Kandyan dance collaboration production Samhara in Utah in 2013. As I explained there, Kandyan dance is one of the three main dance forms identified with the majority Sinhala ethnic community in Sri Lanka and considered Sri Lanka's national dance. Chitrasena founded the Chitrasena School of Dance, the first of its kind in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), in 1944, and his work shared some affinities with Uday Shankar.  As described by Susan Reed in her book Dance and the Nation: Performance, Ritual, and Politics in Sri Lanka, Chitrasena was a "high-caste, English-educated dancer" who became "well known in Colombo for his oriental ballets that combined Ceylonese, Indian, and Western techniques." Kandyan dance later occupied the central character of his choreography, and "Chitrasena and his talented dancer-wife Vajira played a large part in popularizing Kandyan dance in Sri Lanka and raising its acceptability in a time when traditional dance in the country was held in low esteem."

The film's description identifies the performers only as "the delegations of Ceylon" which implies the Chitrasena Dance Company was sent by Ceylon to represent the performing arts of the country which bolsters Susan Reed's point that after 1956 Kandyan dance had become cemented as a symbol of Ceylon's national culture.

In Reel 2 at 3:16, a group of women perform an agriculture-themed dance carrying sickles with movements from Kandyan dance as drummers stand behind them. I am unsure who the woman featured in a closeup is. I wonder if she was a prominent member of the Chitrasena Dance Company?



Switching back to the dances of India, in Reel 3 a dancer (identified in the description as Shirley Kuliar) performs what looks and sounds like aRabindra Nritya solo dance in front of accompanists starting at :57, and Reel 4 features some folk dance with beautiful costumes starting at 4:58. When the Rabindra Nritya segment first began I freaked out for a moment before I realized that the dancer was not Kamala! I wonder if Shirley Kuliar is another Russian mishearing of an Indian name?

What exciting finds! Net-Film has a lot of other interesting Indian-themed footage from the last century, so happy browsing!

Recent Film Classical Dance Finds

$
0
0

And...I'm back! :) Some personal matters have kept me away for a long time, but a moment of inspiration and deciding that my posts don't all have to be lengthy mini-dissertations led to a new post finally, yay! I've gathered a collection of some new classical dance finds in Indian films from the past few years as well as the exciting posting of some songs from Sringaram! Enjoy...

Sringaram (2007, Tamil) - It's been ten years since the devadasi period film Sringaram released, and while there is still no DVD or online release of all the songs or the whole film, director Sharada Ramanathan gave us a yet another glimmer of hope on her Facebook page this past March and June when she said that due to continued interest in the film it would be "out in the public domain soon" and "soon be with a main global network for all to see" with directions to "watch this space" to be informed when. Back in 2015 she had announced a summer DVD release after a Doordarshan telecast brought great interest in the film, but nothing materialized. But this time around, I'm apt to believe something will happen given the appearance online in the last few months of songs and dances from the film. For a throwback to my past posts about Sringaram, I reviewed the film back in 2010 (note that I need to replace all my photobucket-hosted photos on my blog, ugh!) and also wrote about its dance sequences.

"Three Seasons"- Posted to Sharada's YouTube account in April, "Three Seasons" features Saroj Khan's unusually on-beat choreography that is characteristic throughout the film, and trained Bharatanatyam dancers Aditi Rao Hydari and Hamsa Moily perform the Bharatanatyam and Odissi sourced and inspired movements beautifully in elegantly simple practice saris. I find it mesmerizing...


The lovely group procession dance sequence made an appearance last fall on Facebook as well here:
https://www.facebook.com/padminiravidance/videos/439542313099885/


Edavapathi (2016, aka Idavappathi, Malayalam) - A fitting film to feature after Sringaram, Edavapathi brought together some top talent—direction by Lenin Rajendran who previously directed Malayalam dance-based films like Swathi Thirunal, Rathri Mazha, and Makaramanju, cinematography by the award-winning Madhu Ambat who also shot Sringaram and Makaramanju, and Sharada Ramanathan's media company seems to have been involved. The film tells two tales set in two different time periods. One is a modern-day story of a Tibetan monk and his love, and the second is based on Malayali poet Kumaran Asan's poem on Vasavadatta, a great devadasi from centuries ago that longed for the love of the Buddhist monk Upagupta. The modern portions depict the real-life challenges of the Tibetan refugees who have lived in the Mysore area for the past few decades without Indian citizenship but who long for their Tibetan homeland. Rajendran says that the film is ultimately "about the search for a peaceful abode, whether it be of the mind or a physical space" (The Hindu).

For the period portions of the film about the Vasavadatta-Upagupta story, Padma Subramanyam-trained dancer Uttara Unni plays the devadasi Vasavadatta, and Manisha Koirala portrays the role of Vasavadatta's mother! It's delightful to see the Manisha I remember so vividly from 90s films like Dil Se and Bombay come back to the silver screen in a heavy dancing role. A recent ovarian cancer survivor and divorcee, she has been through a lot over the years. Apparently Uttara and Manisha also play separate mother-daughter roles in the modern-day storyline as well.

"Rathisukha Saare" - Manisha is so adorable here! While I find her movements rather clumsy, she dances like someone who is truly enjoying the moment and radiates joy and charisma, whereas Uttara's movements seem more clinical and overly concerned with aesthetics and the external gaze...maybe its that plastered toothy smile she rarely deviates from? The Tibetan monk's attempt to interact with the dancer are awkward, but the courtesan seduction choreography at 2:42 is unabashedly sexy. What gorgeous indoor set design and lighting.



"Pashyathi Dishi" - Unfortunately we don't get to see the entire video song as featured in the film, but this clip shows off the talented vocalist (who clearly isn't recording live for this particular footage) and intersperses dance clips from the film starting at :50. We first see a male-female dancing duo of unknown identity (anyone know who they are?), and initially I thought the man was surely the Kathak dancer Anuj Mishra, but his facial features are different than Anuj's. Following are more clips of mother and daughter from the previous song's indoor setting. Look at Manisha's glorious smile at 1:53! THAT is how you embody joy my friends! Some Kathakali dancers are also sprinkled in around 2:40.

Starts at: 50


A bit more playful generic dancing can be seen in the modern-day set songs Njan Ariyum and Venalinte Chakril.


Kamboji (2017, Malayalam) - Kamboji follows in the footsteps of a long line of Malayalam films with significant Kathakali content, but here we finally get to see Vineeth and Lakshmi Gopalaswamy (whom I have praisedmany times on this blog!) together in a full-length feature for the first time. Kamboji is based on a true story from the 70s about the tragic love of a Mohiniattam dancer (Lakshmi) and Kathakali artist (Vineeth). And what tragedy it is—spoiler alert—Vineeth's character is convicted of murder, and as his last wish performs a Kathakali padam in full costume that ends in his being dragged to the gallows (Deccan Chronicle). Authenticity seems to have been sought for the dances in the film. I was surprised to read that Vineeth had never formally trained in Kathakali (really?), so took on "rigorous training" by Kalamandalam Narayanan (Times of India). It's no surprise however that the film's soundtrack is full of delicate and haunting melodies so common in South Indian film songs, and Kamboji's seem to have a nostalgic air to them.

"Chenthar Nermukhi" - Depicting the expression of love through song, this number was choreographed entirely by Vineeth including the way the shots are composed, and he won the Kerala State Film Award for it. It's clear from Vineeth's interviews about the film that he was careful to base the Mohiniattam and Kathakali dance movements in authenticity (The Hindu), an effort that, when combined with the gentle vocals and soft lighting, makes for a mesmerizing viewing experience. While Vineeth seems to only be able to move one eyebrow most of the time, Lakshmi's eye movements and facial expressions at 4:04 communicate volumes and remind me a vintage Vyjayanthimala!



"Nadavathil" - A scene at 1:12 of young boys practicing Kathakali steps is the first glimpse of dance in this song, followed by the romantic daydream sequence with dance starting at 1:50 and Lakshmi's glorious crowning alapadma-of-desire that rises like peacock plumage at 2:00. Finally a novel way of using the splayed open-fingered alapadma hand gesture in a film dance!


"Anguli Sparsam" - Slow burning and sensuous slow motion movements to match the vocals by Bombay Jayashri. Starting at 3:17, Lakshmi is dressed as what looks like a female Kathakali character and uses relevant choreography inspirations rather than the same old movements seen in countless other film Kathakali dances. But my most favorite part is at 3:55 when Jayashri sings "Sparsam" ("touch" in Malayalam) and Lakshmi pulls Vineeth's alapadma hands down in a cascading descent on her body. Hot!



Priyamanasam (2015, Sanskrit) - Speaking of Kerala's performing arts, the Sanskrit film Priyamanasam definitely belongs on the list, but it's controversy seems to have kept any full clips of it off the interwebs. Judging from the trailer below, it looks to have many pleasing dances including a rare stage Mohiniattam performance that I'd love to see.




Natyam (2016, Telugu) - 
Sandhya Raju is an excellent Kuchipudi dancer of the crisp Vempati Chinna Satyam tradition and directs the Hyderabad-based Nishrinkala Dance Academy in real life. In the indie short film Natyam (released on YouTube) she portrays an ideal upperclass housewife with a rekindled passion for dance from her past, and she is the film's choreographer as well. The film does end up looking like one extended Kirtilals jewelry commercial, but the cinematography and her sheer dancing talent make it a beautiful watch.

Starting from 19:38 onward, Sandhya's real-life Nishrinkala Dance Academy is a frequent location for various practice and other dance scenes interspersed with scenes from her character's life. My favorite is her practice solo at 23:04 below which showcases her lightfooted crisp Kuchipudi form.

Start 23:04

"Pranamu Pranavakaram" - Kuchipudi adavus, movements, and style abound in her big stage re-debut near the end of the film! Interesting filmwork and lighting highlight her talent. I'm not a big fan of the electric guitar fusion, but it's definitely a creative composition.



I just learned that Sandhya had previously danced throughout the beginning song of the 2012 Telugu devotional film Devasthanam, but she's restricted to doing the short bursts of dance postures seen in so many other classical dances in films. You can see her starting at 4:18 here (and yup, that's K. Vishwanath!).


Aattakkatha (2013, Malayalam) - Another movie about a white chick who loves Indian dance! Aattakkatha centers on a European woman who comes to Kerala to study Kathakali at the famous Kalamandalam institution and falls in love there with a dancer portrayed by Vineeth. It's based on the real-life story of German actress Irina Jacobi who plays herself and at the time was in her fifth year of intensive training on scholarship in Kathakali at Kalamandalam.

Even though it seems like a poorly made film with old-school camera work, strange editing, a schizophrenic soundtrack and sound effects, atrocious voice dubbing, and really bad acting on the part of Irina, I think it's probably the first time a white chick learning Indian dance has been portrayed in such detail in a film. The film entirely revolves around the Kathakali performing art and its immediate environs, and it almost feels a bit documentary-like at times. But being that this is a white chick, she can't be perfect of course, so she is seen *gasp* smoking and *shock* drinking in the film which at one point is so egregious it requires antismoking and antialcohol public service warning messages to be displayed at the bottom of the screen.

Irina's Introduction Scene - Irina Jacobi is first seen in the film performing warm up face and upper body exercises under the direction of her guru's assistant. It's nice that the filmmakers let this scene linger for a while so we can get a flavor of what this art involves. This clip doesn't include the moments preceding when her guru's assistant puts oil into her eyes and she performs circular eye movements.



Dressing Scene - I don't think I've ever seen the process of putting together a Kathakali costume depicted in such detail before in a commercial film. Here we have the novelty of a white chick being the subject of awkward upper body wrapping, but luckily at 2:50 we get to see her actually perform on stage. It's only introductory facial movements (and she seems especially sweaty), but that's a big accomplish for a white chick in an Indian film!


Practice Scene - Here's the customary practice scene featuring Vineeth, and Irina's interest is so "pure" she is mesmerized by it.



"Heemambari Thoomanjalil" - Vineeth and Irina's characters fall in love and have a naughty night in the film, and its depiction in this song is simply laugh-out-loud horrid! Amidst annoying jump cuts and outdated instrumentals, Irina looks like the most uncomfortable, bored, and awkward heroine ever. They even try to pay homage to the vastly superior film Vanaprastham at 3:22 when Vineeth tries to literally smear his makeup on Irina's face in what was supposed to be a sensuous allusion to physical intimacy in the other film but looks here like an attack by facepaint. 100% cringeworthy start to finish!



You can watch the whole film without English subtitles here—other parts of interest are the Kathakali performance at 48:46, Irina's second practice scene with her angry guru at 1:02:50, and Irina's third practice scene with yet a still angry guru at 1:35:06. I wonder if Irina Jacobi is related to Isa Jacobi who came to India from Germany in 1979 per the ICCR to train in Kathakali (The Hindu)?

Foreigners (largely white westerners) have been coming to institutions and gurus in India to study directly from the source for decades, and I was surprised to read that the Kalamandalam institution in Kerala gets the most students from Germany! France has been another popular source of students seeking dance training in India. Back in the 1920s and 30s there was Simkie in Uday Shankar's troupe, later in the 70s and 80s there were Bharatanatyam students like Devayani who was featured in America Ammayi and Laurance Pourtale  who featured in the original Tamil version Melnattu Marumagal, and recently "Paris Laxmi" has featured in Malayalam films and actually married an Indian Kathakali dancer (post coming on her later?). And of course there is the American native Sharon Lowen who studied Odissi/Chhau/Manipuri and was featured in Swarmakamalam.


Uttama Villain (2015, Tamil) - Kamal Hassan was back at it in 2015's Uttama Villain which had a folklore film being shot within the film. Wanting to do something similar to the "folk art" Yakshagana that he was familiar with, Kamal chose to draw inspiration from "folk" performing art traditions of Kerala and Tamil Nadu like Theyyam/Kaliyattam and Koothu/Villu Paatu traditions as inspiration because of the "visual and colour appeal" (The Hindu). And it's definitely brashly colorful in the film with a goal of creative spectacle rather than authenticity.




Jaanisaar (2015, Hindi) -  The North Indian courtesan mujra dances in this period film by debutant actress and dancer Pernia Qureshi are clinical and lifeless and have only a thin veneer of surface prettiness. The film has pedigree behind it—direction by Muzaffar Ali of 1981 Umrao Jaan fame and choreography by famous Kathak gurus Kumudini Lakhia and Birju Maharaj. But wow did it turn out terribly. And I learned long ago that having a famous guru choreograph your film does not translate into good dance on screen. I think this India Today review sums it up best: "Jaanisaar, in which even Kumudini Lakhia and Birju Maharaj cannot make the leading lady look good...it's just her inability to do abhinaya or emote well...[t]hat explains why there are hardly any close-ups of Qureshi in the film and the camera keeps tracking her." This becomes even more painfully obvious in the marketing of the film which tried to capitalize on Pernia with a hilarious Learn Indian Classical Dance with Pernia Qureshi "instructional" course which has essentially zero instruction. 

"Hamein Bhi Pyar Kar Le" - Kumudini Lakhia choreographed this mujra with "old traditional kathak" movements. Pernia says that Birju Maharaj had to "break the Kuchipudi out of me first" to learn Kathak before she trained with Kumudini. Sigh.


Pernia has two other dances in the film you can subject yourself to: the group dance in Achchi Surat Pe, and the outdoor "aren't I so pretty?" frolicking of Teri Katili Nigahon Ne Mara.

Some Other Finds

Last, here's a collection of some other finds of mine that I didn't feel warranted a dedicated spot in the post. The playlist includes Deepika Padukone in Bajirao Mastani (2015 Hindi) and cartoonified weirdness in Kochadaiiyaan (2014 Tamil), Rukmini Vijayakumar in Bajarangi (2013 Kannada), Trisha in Yennai Arindhaal (2015 Tamil), Anushka and Ashrita Vemuganti in Baahubali 2 (2017, Telugu), Meghana Raj in Allama (2017 Kannada), Aditi Rao Hydari in Wazir (2016 Hindi), and other random classical bits and pieces, whether good or terrible!



If the playlist doesn't advance to the next video, view it here on YouTube.

Blog Hiatus, a Rare Simkie Photo, and Distinguishing Kuchipudi

$
0
0
Hello dear readers and friends!  Well...it has been some time since I have posted or updated this blog.  My how time flies!  Long overdue is a post letting folks know that this blog is on an indefinite hiatus.

My posts on this blog have always been fueled and energized by elation, joy, and excitement in the subject matter--purely felt and honestly channeled into writings in a medium that allowed me to share whatever bliss I was experiencing with likeminded people around the globe.   And I have never posted unless I felt that enthusiasm. For various reasons, some known and others unknown to me, my engagement and enthusiasm have waned, and in that mindset I simply can't post in the same way as I have in the past, at least in good conscience.

The blog is on an indefinite hiatus, and who knows what the future will bring.  I don't want to make any promises that I can't keep, a defect of which I have been guilty of in the past, though I've always had the best, though misguided, intentions!  Should the passion of my past return, I will certainly resume the little mini-research projects I call posts. :D

This blog really blossomed in late 2010, continued the exuberance through 2016, and had a last hurrah in 2017.  I am extremely proud of the work that I did, archived here, hopefully forever, for anyone to see, cherish, and enjoy.  I have had the great fortune of having certain posts graced with comments by famous dancers, academics, and family members of post subjects.  I have met, virtually and in real life, amazing people who have enriched my knowledge, shared my passions, and became my friends. I have disappointed a few, and perhaps treaded not very lightly into contentious and problematic topics and subjects in the history of dance, class, and politics in India. But, I hope that my genuine interest and sympathy for the "underdog" and marginalized has come through.

I realize that as time passes that more broken links, outdated videos, and web maintenance tasks left undone will cause the blog to become harder to use, and as I'm able I will try to keep things up to date.  The fonts aren't always easy to read, and the formatting is goofed up in places. But, please have patience in the meantime. And feel free to drop me a line with any requests to fix things!

So in the low pressure environment of this hiatus post, where I don't have to spend weeks gathering information, making connections, and extensively citing my sources, I thought it would be fun to browse through my draft posts that have never been published and pull out a couple bits of material to finally give it the light of day.


A Rare Photo of Simkie

Simkie, that elusive and mysterious French dance partner of Uday Shanker, most prolifically in the late 1920s and 1930s. I tried for some time to try to figure out a timeline of her later years and what happened to her.

My most cherished find was this little photo and snippet that I found in the January 1949 issue of Dance Magazine. LOOK AT THIS:


It's very hard to find pictures of Simkie in her post-Uday Shankar period, and here she is just shy of 40!  A rare find indeed. I had been waiting to post it until I could come up with a thorough history of her life.

Thorough it's not thorough, I tried my best, and from all the research I've done on Simkie, including the sources I've read (Projesh Banerji and Ruth Abrahams' dissertation mostly), email conversations with academics, and a translation of the French documentary on her, here's what I think happened to her, in very dry and simple terms.  She had a "falling out" with Uday Shankar at some point, and married Prabhat Ganguli when she was at Shankar's Almora Centre, hence the "Madame Ganguli" name in the above photo. She returned to France and was there in 1949, before returning again to India in the early 1950s, where she choreographed for the films Awaara (1951) and Jhansi ki Rani (1953). At some point after this she worked at All India Radio in Delhi, never talking about her past dance life. Then she met an Englishman, Mr. Hannon, in Bombay, married him, and returned to England where she lived until her death in 1998. Given everything I've read on her, her life seems like it was not the happiest one, especially her years and fascination with India that turned sour.  How I wish more information was known about her!


The Clearest Difference Between Kuchipudi and Bharatanatyam

One post I cooked up but never fully coalesced into a cohesive thesis is about the history of Kuchipudi dance in South Indian Cinema, which has grown up under the shadow of Bharatanatyam and has a unique and fascinating history.  There is some enlightening authorship out there in recent years, such as Rumya Sree Putcha's dissertation Revisiting the Classical: A Critical History of Kuchipudi Dance (some of her research is found in her separate article "Between History and Historiography: The Origins of Classical Kuchipudi Dance"), Katyayani Thota and Anuradha (Jonnalagadda) Tadakamalla's article Marking the Telugu Cultural Identity: Kuchipudi and its Role in Cinema, and Amrita Lahiri's piece at Narthaki, "Kuchipudi: Resurgence or Funeral?" I learned that I was not imaging things when seeing Bharatanatyam choreography in old Telugu films--it was intentionally done so in certain settings and to imply certain things, in contrast to Kuchipudi!

While trying to publish a post about all this unique dance history ultimately exhausted me, one treasure I came away with was finally having a good understanding of the difference between Bharatnatyam and Kuchipudi dance!

So how can the average person easily tell the difference between Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi movement vocabulary? Putcha says that the "clearest differentiation between the two styles" is an adavu (basic dance movement/steps) called "Muktaimpu Adavu" or referred to by its solkattu (spoken rhythmic syllables) name "Di-Di-Thai." From my research, this adavu seems to be more popularly known as "Theermanam Adavu"and also by two other solkattu variations: "Gi-Na-Tom," or "Kittatakka-Dhari-Kitta-Thome." It appears to be used at the ending of a pure dance sequence and is repeated three times in triplicate--a feature that makes it easy to recognize for those not intimately familiar with the forms.

The trouble with adavus of course is that there is not one set way to do an adavu in a dance form because there are usually multiple variations that can look quite different. Below is an excellent comparison of three variations of the Theermanam Adavu in Kuchipudi (pink costume) and Bharatanatyam (green costume). Each time you hear the solkattu syllabus "Gi Na Tom," that's when the Tirmanam Adavu movement happens in triplicate. Don't look at the names underneath, which are confusingly listed in the wrong order for this part of the video! Kuchipudi is on the left, and Bharatanatyam is on the right!

Start 3:54 
Left: Kuchipudi                       Right: Bharatanatyam

The movement in the third repetition (at 4:09) seem to be the most commonly used in the dance forms in my viewing experience.

Great videos clearly detailing this specific variation can be seen here for Bharatanatyam (solkattu "Kittatakka Dhari Kitta Thome") and here for Kuchipudi (solkattu "Gi Na Thom")--see how in Bharatanatyam the arm sweeps over the head from back to front, and in Kuchipudi it stays out to each side?

This side to side sweeping movement in Kuchipudi is the same one Kamal Hassan's character chooses to demonstrate in Sagara Sangamam/Salangai Oli when he's trying to nonverbally show the dance forms he knows.
Start :56

Here's another great video comparing the two forms, from the documentary Kuchipudi Revisited, that I touched upon in a past post:

Start: 26:06
Left: Bharatanatyam            Right: Kuchipudi


Here's yet another variation of the adavu in Kuchipudi, not seen in any of these videos. Got it? :)

I Bid Adieu for now!

Birju Maharaj Dancing Kathak in Khayal Gatha (1988, Hindi)...Yes, I'm Back, Hiatus Ended!

$
0
0
I'm back, my excitement has spontaneously returned, and the blog has had a facelift that's still under some construction.  More on all that soon, but for now, on to the content!

Every once in a while I search the interwebs to see if any cinematic/archival dances from my wishlist have surfaced. On a recent search jaunt, I was delighted to find that footage has been posted online of the great Kathak doyen, Pandit Birju Maharaj, dancing in the 1988 Hindi film Khayal Gatha ("The Khayal Saga," sometimes listed as being released in 1989).  I knew Birju Maharaj had choreographed for some Kathak dances in films, but Khayal Gatha was the only instance I'd read of where he was in front of the camera, rather than behind it.  Kathak hasn't made that many appearances on this blog in the past, but like those fewtimes, this is a real treat.


Pandit Birju Maharaj, for those who aren't aware of his stature, is probably the name most synonymous with Kathak dance in the last half-century, a 1930s-born acclaimed carrier of his family's now-predominant Lucknow gharana of Kathak, a critical part of the standardization and institutionalization of Kathak in the Indian post-independence dance revival and reckoning that took place in his most formative years, a beloved and very charismatic and likable performer, and an innovator within traditional boundaries.  He was instrumental in popularizing the dance form in India and the world, and is still doing so today, traveling around the globe in his 80s.

It quickly became apparent in watching Khayal Gatha that Birju chose an "art film" far from the world of commercial cinema for his cinematic dance debut.  (Note, I will leave out honorifics and refer to him simply as "Birju" for brevity and clarity.)  Kumar Shahani, a significant name in Indian parallel/new wave cinema, was by all accounts a radical, experimental, and avant-garde filmmaker.  Khayal Gatha is no exception—when I first browsed through the film I could not make any sense of it, so I found what some wiser people than I had written about the film and Shahani which helped quite a bit, but much interpretation is left for the educated viewer to decide.

Writings on the film [1,2,3,4] describe Khayal Gatha as an experimental and sensory exploration of real and invented Indian legends, traditions, and performing arts from the past five centuries to the contemporary period, many related to the vocal tradition of Khayal, a genre of North Indian/Hindustani classical/semi-classical music that is heard throughout the film and as a style features improvisation, microtones and gliding between notes, and a varied range of classical, folk, and popular sources that the film is greatly inspired by.  The lead character, portrayed by actor Rajat Kapoor in his debut (whom I can never unsee as anything but the creepy pedophile in Monsoon Wedding!), is a wanderer and seeker who is at times an observer and other times takes on the personas of the various legendary figures being depicted.  Plenty of allegory, abstraction, metaphor, repeated scenes, and a lack of chronological storytelling tick the experimental boxes, and the dialogues are often philosophical and meant to inspire thought.  Ultimately, the film can be interpreted in very complex ways in relation to the wounds of historical loss, the human sensory experience, cyclical movements and the nature of time, and much more that's beyond the scope of this post...and beyond my comprehension.

Director Kumar Shahani used dance and music in many of his films.  His work has been featured on the blog before when I posted about excitedly finding dances from Shahani’s later films Bhavantarana (1991), featuring the late Odissi Guru Kelucharan Mohapatra and other famous Odissi dancers, and Bamboo Flute (2000), featuring dances by Mohapatra as well as Alarmel Valli.

I was heartened to read that Khayal Gatha features key musical contributions (and I assume on-screen appearances) "by some of the foremost musicians from the Gwalior gharana" of Indian classical music [5].  But of course, of most interest to this blog is that the great Birju Maharaj dances in a feature film!  We get to see him three times totaling about seven minutes of footage spread out over two primarily pure dance pieces and one expressive piece.  There's also a Kathak dance practice scene by two women, and you know how I love a good practice dance!

Watching other performance and demonstration footage of Birju dancing online, he is among the great performers who have so imbibed and internalized a dance form and all its associated complexities that his performances look effortless and a part of his very being.  For those who don't know who he is, Birju at first glance isn't the most handsome male dancer, doesn't have that "ideal" body shape, and wears simple clothing, but on watching him perform, these things quickly become irrelevant.

Dances in Khayal Gatha

Introductory Dance - Birju Maharaj's first dance in the film, and the film itself, are said to be visually inspired by Mughal miniature paintings, which often feature the "framing of a figure against a window" or vacant space[2] From behind an empty door frame, rhythmic sounds precede Birju's movements into view. He depicts a horse and horse riding, a common sight and method of transport throughout the film as the wanderer makes his journey, and soon "gallops" off screen to a cut of his truncated dancing body framed by a window, the lighting inverted.

Birju's assuredness and style of movement is commanding!  Regrettably, his dance lasts less than a minute, soon interrupted by the wandering protagonist (Rajat Kapoor) slowly walking by and gazing at the dancer in the window. The wanderer knocks on the door, and a woman answers—she (actress Alaknanda Samarth) is an oracle-type seen throughout the film in different avatars, provoking philosophical/critical thought and learning in the wanderer.  The oracle leads the wanderer to her guru, and unties cloth that had been wrapped around his feet.  What does that mean, I wonder?  When the wanderer responds to the oracle's question "to what are you bound," her reply is, intriguingly, interpreted by cinema studies scholar Laleen Jayamanne [2] to refer to the notion of "the mere exact repetition of the form without an internalization of its spirit [being] rejected as unworthy of the tradition," a sentiment applicable to the dance tradition shown the film as well as the film's philosophical yearnings.

Video starts 56:08


"Mohe Chedo Na Nand Ke" Scene - Near the beginning of the film when the wanderer as a child first sets off on his journey, the Sufi's sole advice to him is to "stay close to the river to quench your thirst," which according to Jayamanne is the "river of knowledge." The river motif is seen repeatedly in the film as a "vital energy, a goddess, a primordial mother without whom life is unlivable spiritually or erotically" [2].  

In the scene below, Birju's only seated dance in the film, he demonstrates expressive abhinaya with only the upper body in multiple interpretations of the same phrase from the thumri "Mohe Chedo Na Nand Ke," a well known piece from the Lucknow gharana detailing a nayika begging Lord Krisha to stop bothering her as she tries to make her way down to the river.  The river motif!  Birju is as splendid as expected.  A grander meaning is implied when the nayika asks for her senses to be appeased and see only the divine.  The wanderer accompanies the dance guru on the Tanpura drone, presumably as his student.  All the audio sounds dubbed in the film, and in this scene in particular it seems out of sync which detracts from the overall affect.  The English subtitles are spotty, and greatly needed for us non-Hindi speakers!

Video starts 1:06:45

There are obvious similarities between the above thumri and the seated portion of Madhuri Dixit's "Kahe Chhed Mohe" dance in Devdas (2002, Hindi) that Birju Maharaj choreographed 14 years later, not only in the similar raga and lyrics but also the movement parallels.  Comparing the two side-by-side below, I can't think of a better example of how authentic Kathak becomes altered and edited on screen in commercial film dances, and how different the environs and pace of music and overall effect is.  The lyrics sung at the start of the Devdas song below, which is derived from a thumri composed by Birju's grandfather Bindadin Maharaj, mean "why do you tease me, and then embrace me?" ("kaahe chhed chhed mohe, garva lagai") [6].  To be fair, "Kahe Chhed Mohe" is still in a different league from the other mujra in the film, "Maar Dala," which was not choreographed by Birju and replaces the exacting expressions and movements in its seated portion with generalizations far from Kathak and very Bollywood-dance-esque.  A better version of "Kahe Chhed Mohe" is at the Eros YouTube channel (but no embeds allowed).  More on the dances in Devdas later on the blog soon...

Left: Khayal Gatha, starts 1:07                                          Right: Devdas, starts 1:57

Pavilion Dance Scene - After a tragic sequence depicting the Heer-Ranja legend set across desolate sand dunes and Khayal vocals, the oracle woman appears again, sweeping thick sand and dirt from a walkway as she recites poetic dialogue.   Her words of surrender finish while Birju's fastest footwork and movement in the film is seen amidst pavilion columns, the oracle now watching him transported into the new space.  Isn't he wonderful!  We see some chakkar spins and those tihai endings repeating in triplicate that are so satisfying to anticipate.  While the slaps of his feet are audible, the ghungroo bells are not dubbed in and are strangely silent.

His dance then transitions to the slow, delicate movements Kathak is known for.  Suddenly, a quick edit focuses us on the only experimental dance in the film, the oracle gesturing between two pillars as if pressing against a window.  According to Ashish Rajadhyaksha, this scene depicts "the only myth that the film formally constructs, between a dance teacher (played by Birju Maharaj) and the woman who cared for him - trapped as he took over her femininity" [4].  Birju closes his performance with some brief, slow-paced grace, now lit against a backdrop of the darkness of night.

Video starts 1:22:26 with the poetic intro (dance at 1:22:59)

This is the last we see of him in the film.  Looking at all of his dances together, what an impact, and what a rare record of Birju in cinema!  According to Kumar Shahani, Birju only had a few hours to shoot his scenes (which according to the looks of the film were shot starting in an afternoon and stretched into the evening darkness), but it posed no problem since Shahani could "realise within hours with [Birju] what would normally take a few days to condense into significance" [4].  

Practice Dance Scene - Birju Maharj is not the only dancer seen in the film.  Kathak dancers Suchitra Harmalkar and Vijaya Sharma perform some short dance practice scenes, my favorite!  I discovered their identities from a couplewebpages about them from dance/music schools they are associated with.  The young women dance as an older woman recites the rhythmic bols/spoken syllables.  In the second half at 39:45 that starts after a short scene of a woman walking, a bird can be heard loudly in a rhythm at odds with the dance—avian calls and sounds are frequent in the film, surely an intentional inclusion by Shahani, maybe to throw some dissonant sensory input in the mix, but I'm unsure what the intended purpose is.  At 42:33, one of the dancers is seen in a solo, final practice dance.

Video starts 38:41


Coming Up Next

Hindi films have been a minority on this blog in the past because the way Kathak is represented in their dances, courtesan mujras, and court performances rarely excites or engages me.  Inspired by the discovery of Birju Maharaj's dance in Khayal Gatha, I am working on two follow up posts to be published soon.  One will look at all of Birju's dance direction and choreographic work in cinema, from his best (and first) in Shatranj Ke Khilari to the current year, and the other will pull together the film dance choreographies of Birju's family, namely uncle Lacchu Maharaj, plus a surprise discovery.  I've never sat down and watched all of their creations in cinema, so it's been fun to finally get around to it!

I also have some exciting news to share, after discovering completely by chance that my blog has been cited in an excellent book about Bharatanatyam and dance in early Tamil cinema that was published last month.  More and more research and information related to the topics of this blog is slowly coming to light.  It's an exciting time folks.  See you soon...


Cited Sources:
  1. Ghosh, Sankhayan. "The filmmaker who refused to fit in."  The Hindu. March 24, 2016.
  2. Jayamanne, Laleen. The Epic Cinema of Kumar Shahani.  2014.
  3. Pinto, Elroy.  "Towards a micro-tonal aesthetic of sound and colour in Kumar Shahani's Khayal Gatha."
  4. Rajadhyaksha, Ashish.  "Kumar Shahani Now." In Rajadhyaksha, Ashish (Editor), Kumar Shahani: The Shock of Desire and Other Essays.  2015.
  5. Rajadhyaksha, Ashish and Willeman, Paul.  Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema. 1999.
  6. Muni, Anisha.  American Kathaks: Embodying Memory and Tradition in New ContextsMay 2018.  CUNY Academic Works.  Master's thesis.

Film Kathak Choreographies of Birju Maharaj

$
0
0

My last post about the discovery of Birju Maharaj dancing Kathak on screen in the art film Khayal Gatha inspired me to go watch all of his film choreographies that I've heard bits and pieces about over the years.

I haven't featured much Kathak (or Hindi film dances) on this blog to date because, from what I've seen, the way it is presented and drawn from in Indian cinema rarely excites or engages me.  Kathak is by far the most dominant dance inspiration in Hindi cinema when something a bit "classical" is desired, whether in standard song-and-dance numbers or the ever popular courtesan mujras and court dances.  Pallabi Chakravorty in her excellent book Bells of Change: Kathak Dance, Women and Modernity in India contextualizes further, noting that "Kathak is so deeply enmeshed in the cultural ethos of North India that its motifs subtly encapsulate the amorphous notion of ‘Indian-ness’ within the dominant forces of Westernization in commercial cinema."

I love explosive nritta (pure dance) and rhythmic wizardry when done well, so my favorite instances of Kathak in Indian cinema are Kathak danseuse Roshan Kumari's spellbinding nritta in Jalsaghar (1958, Bengali) and fast-paced spins in Mirza Ghalib (1954, Hindi) that I featured in my post about her, but I also appreciate slower emotive dance when it connects with me, most notably the second dancer in the Kathak sequence in Khudito Pashan (1960, Bengali) which to this day holds my gaze in rapture.  But most other "Kathak" that I've seen in Indian films, Hindi or other languages, feel like pretty posturing with lots of what I like to call "generalized waving and flailing ones arms about" that looks vaguely like Kathak.  Easy it would be to up the showmanship and show off some impressive foot slapping and ghungroo bell patterns, or even throw in a stylized hand gesture, but film Kathak usually seems to go for messy spins and wavey arm movements as its main focus.

[Source]
As I described in my last post, Pandit Birju Maharaj, for those who aren't aware of his stature, is probably the name most synonymous with Kathak dance in recent decades, a 1930s-born acclaimed carrier of his family's now-predominant Lucknow gharana of Kathak, a critical part of the standardization and institutionalization of Kathak in the Indian post-independence dance revival and reckoning that took place in his most formative years, a beloved and very charismatic and likable performer, and an innovator within traditional boundaries.  He was instrumental in popularizing the dance form in India and the world, and is still doing so today, traveling around the globe in his 80s.

With Birju (I will leave out honorifics and refer to him simply as "Birju" from now on for brevity and clarity) being such a respected figure of Kathak dance, I had hoped his participation in film choreography would mean I'd finally get to see some more traditional and difficult Kathak movements and emoting being reflected on screen.  In interviews Birju has said that he sees directing dance in films as a fun diversion but that he is selective with his film choreographies, getting many requests but declining most of them [11, 12].  He claims his film choreography is "pure to the core without any dilution [and] highly refined," and that he endeavors to get the actress he trains up to a level to show off the dance form [15].

For me, none of his serious film dances really engage or connect, and I don't find myself wanting to go back and rewatch and savor them.  Many of them are presented as overwhelming spectacles, with the Kathak almost being a gimmick, something to give the number more gravitas and traditional culture, but without lending it the same respect back.  Birju's participation in choreographing (usually) only one dance is highly publicized in the Indian media, reflecting the film variation of Pallabi Chakravorty's observation that Birju Maharaj's "name and gharana are used for marketing one's saleability and authenticity as a Kathak exponent in the contemporary world"[1].

With the exception of his first dance direction in Shatranj Ke Khilari, all the other films he's choreographed for are big budget commercial films featuring big stars. These aren't art films that might have space for a serious depiction of dance—rather, these are popular films that have A-list cast members who are briefly trained to perform his choreography.  In Shatranj Ke Khilari he was able to choreograph for an actual real-life Kathak trainee who had no acting role in the film and appeared only for the dance sequence, but for most of his film choreographies, the focal points are actresses/actors with varying real-life dance training to choreograph and direct in a very short time frame.  The purpose is not to showcase the dance form at its best but to showcase the actress or actor performing the dance form.  With such short dance training time, the dances never reach the heights that they could have if extensively trained Kathak dancers from real life had been brought in, who could focus on the actual overall choreography rather than spending so much time learning basics of the dance form.  Or, Birju himself could have appeared on screen!  And let's not forget that cinematic dance is an visual art form of its own, shaped not only by the on-site choreographer and dancers but perhaps almost as equally by the technicians and post-production staff that morph the recorded footage into its final cinematic output that we see.

While these dances do disappoint me overall, likely due to the sky-high expectations of having someone of Birju's stature and background involved, there are some clear positives and details that Birju's involvement brings to the film dances he's associated with.

Though the main dancer is usually an actress who can only be trained by him for a short time, where Birju gets to draw from real-life dancers is in the signature aspect of all his film choreographies after the year 2000: a group of young women in Kathak costume dancing in sync in the background together with very crisp "pure dance" movements that look to be from traditional Kathak or very close to it.  While the main dancer may not be up to par, Birju can showcase great Kathak in the group dancers, most of whom I've read come from his dance school or are his students, which is a nice touch.

Another unique feature of his film dances is that they are often based on actual compositions from his hereditary lineage and on his performances from real life.  The songs are often drawn from the real-life thumris of his granduncle Bindadin Maharaj and sometimes feature Birju's actual recorded voice on the vocals or bols/rhythmic syllables.  His work is visually differentiated from your average "pseudo-kathak" in Hindi films most notably by the inclusion of plenty of stylized and complex hand gestures (well, as much as the actress or actor can handle!), but also movements that go beyond the "generalized waving and flailing ones arms about" to an adherence to specific shapes and formations of the arms and body.  There aren't any hip and shoulder shimmies as seen in so much "Bollywood dance" inspired by Kathak, and it's clear that the goal is depicting something close to traditional Kathak movement.

Let's take a look shall we at all of his film dance direction in chronological order.

The First: Shatranj Ke Khilari (1977)

Birju's first foray into the cinema world was choreographing the courtly thumri "Kanha Main Tose Haari" for Shatranj Ke Khilari (1977, Urdu/Hindi).  It's no surprise that he was asked to choreograph the dances given the film's subject of Wajid Ali Shah, ruler of mid-1800s Awadh and lover of the arts whose court and patronage nourished the flowering of Birju Maharaj's own real-life family tradition, the Lucknow gharana of Kathak.

What is so unique about this film dance, compared to all the others he choreographed for, is that it features an actual student of Kathak, Saswati Sen, brought to the film only to perform the dance.  Saswati Sen is now known for her long-time close association with Birju as a top disciple, following him from the prestigious Kathak Kendra to her current administrative work at his own school Kalashram, performing and organizing his tours around the world, contributing to the art of Kathak, and from what I can tell, being by his side as a support a good deal of the time.  But Shatranj Ke Khilari was before all of that.  At that time (apparently she was 20 at the point of filming [14]) she wasn't a professional Kathak dancer and was taking Birju Maharaj's evening dance classes, but as fate would have it, Satyajit Ray saw her perform somewhere and then went on a mission to seek her out to convince her to dance in his film [8].

Satyajit Ray directed Birju to create not a "filmy classical" dance piece but a "pure classical Kathak" one that inspires peace and serenity in the onlooking Nawab [11].  Birju got to work at "meticulously rehearsing [Saswati Sen] on body angles, eye glances, head turns, for no movement, however slight could be indulged in without considering the camera angle"[7].  Apparently the man portraying the singer for the dance is Pradeep Shankar, one of Birju's real-life students [5], but the vocals we hear are actually sung by Birju himself (either offscreen or recorded separately), the lyrics "Kanha Main Tose Hari, Chhoro Sari" ("Krishna I've lost to you, leave my sari") taken from the large thumri compositional output of Birju's granduncle Bindadin Maharaj [5]

Embedded playback not allowed; click image to link to video

For me, it's a slow burn that is, as I called it in my review of the film nearly 10 years ago, underwhelming.  It seems like in Saswati's efforts to dance in the way requested, one that inspires tranquility, she has nearly tranquilized her face!  This was filmed before she was seriously training in Kathak, but I have noticed that quite a lot of online videos of her Kathak from years later feel similarly facially restrained to the point of near-blankness, but some from her younger years show a range of natural facial expressions like this one at Wild Films India's YouTube channel.  In the Shatranj Ke Khilari dance, her parted lips are a bit distracting, but I found it amusingly cute how we can see the effort behind her dance and pursed lips in the spins at 3:16.  Right after that point is where her dance best shines—in her pure dance, with her quick spins performed in a delicate yet masterful and quick way that works so well given the mood of the song and setting.  It's curious to me that she never looks at the Nawab, or the other spectators in the room, but seems to focus her gaze either towards the floor or up at the top of the wall.  As much as I like her pure dance, overall this dance is not one of my favorites.

I was intrigued by a blogger who similarly felt bored by the dance and surmised that maybe the "cute but rather weak" dancing was an intentional choice by director Satyajit Ray "to portray the King as an ineffectual voluptuary," which fits with the theme of the film in depicting the king/nawab as pursuing arts at the expense of his ruling responsibilities.  Maybe this is also why Birju Maharaj isn't the one dancing on screen himself, which would have made perfect sense given how much I've read about men in his family's tradition being the court dancers, but his commanding and detailed style wouldn't have quite matched with the lazy, easy artistic pleasures sought by the Nawab.  I was not surprised that the aforementioned blogger felt bored about most Kathak until viewing Roshan Kumari's powerful dance in Jalsaghar which brought about their first "kathak rapture" (Yes! That dance should be required viewing when talking about Kathak in films).  

Shantranj Ke Khilari's introductory credits also list "Gitanjali and Kathak Kalakendra Ballet Troupe New Delhi," and they are seen in a brief group dance scene with slow spins around Wajid Ali Shah in this video that starts at 5:43.

Birju's Other Film Choreographies

Looking at the rest of Birju's body of work in directing dance in Hindi cinema, after Shatranj Ke Khilari in 1977 and his on-screen performance in Khayal Gatha in 1988, he continued the once-every-decade tradition by not choreographing for cinema again until Dil to Pagal Hai in 1997.  After that, he had a break for a few years before returning for Gadar: Ek Prem Katha in 2001 and Devdas in 2002.  Wedged between Devdas and his most recent works was Pranali: The Tradition in 2008, which then brings us to the last few years in which he has been the most active, nearly averaging one film a year: Vishwaroop (2013), Dedh Ishqiya (2014), Bajirao Mastani (2015), Jaanisaar (2015), Vishwaroop 2 (2018), and Kalank (2019).  This assumes I'm not missing any other films he was involved in, but it's unlikely given how publicized his participation is.

Dil to Pagal Hai (1997, Hindi)

First up is the fun and absolute guilty pleasure of Madhuri's Kathak-inspired dance duel with the rhythms of Shah Rukh Kahn's drums in Dil to Pagal Haiwhich I was surprised to see is proudly listed in the "Contributions to the Film Industry" section of Birju's dance school website.  According to Birju himself, he first noticed Madhuri's dance abilities when she attended a dance workshop he was holding in California, and that led to his choreographing a brief dance for her in Dil to Pagal Hai [10], but apparently he wasn't actually on set, instead sending his son [13].  This is one of those overlooked facets of film dances, that there are usually assistants helping choreograph them who rarely get credited.  Dil to Pagal Hai's dance is nothing like his film dances after this point, but it's a prime example of Madhuri's joyous abandon and dance training, and I'm glad it happened because it connected Birju and Madhuri for a number of film dance projects to follow.  The choreography here is focused on short spurts of poses and flourishes inspired by Kathak but with joyful film flare.  Deliciously 90s, just like the contemporary "Dance of Envy" from the same film (you know you want to watch it).



Gadar: Ek Prem Katha (2001, Hindi)

"Aan Milo Sajana" in Gadar: Ek Prem Katha is the first appearance of what has become standard in Birju's film dances to this day: a group of young women in Kathak costume dancing in sync together with very crisp "pure dance" movements that look to be from traditional Kathak or very close to it.  To be effective, all the dancers in the group have to be in perfect sync, but in this first attempt, some of the dancers are comically off pace with the others.  Birju's dance school site says the choreography was composed to be "forming a backdrop to show Ameesha Patel’s turmoil," but in an interview [13] he expresses clear dissatisfaction with the final result, with words as scathing as he can muster, "they did not show it with honesty so the enjoyment was missing."  I'm guessing he composed a lot more that was cut out, or it was meant to be viewed in longer segments to understand the meaning.

Given the film's partition setting of a well-to-do Muslim young woman being separated from her family whom she believes to have died, falling in love and starting a new life with a Sikh man, then reuniting with the family she thought was killed who then try to force her to marry a more suitable guy, the dancers seem to be not only serving as a pleasant performance in the family hall but also expressing Ameesha's character's love for the Sikh man that now cannot be.  Unlike Birju's later film choreographies, the dancers form only a pleasant backdrop and are interrupted so often by intercut shots and the bustling happenings in the family hall that the dance has no cohesive identity.  The official clip below cuts off almost 2 minutes of the sequence ending with Amisha storming out of the hall past an elevated shot of a formation of the spinning dancers who drop to the seated position right as she falls into bed sobbing.  You can see the rest of the clip in this video that has mismatched music dubbed in.  Apparently the film was gargantuan grosser at the time, so it garnered a lot of eyeballs on an example of more traditional Kathak in Hindi cinema.



Devdas (2002, Hindi)

"Kahe Chhed Mohe" in Devdas continues the "group of women dancing in sync" motif but ups the technicality and speed and adds a frontline dancer as the focal point: Madhuri Dixit, in her first full-length film dance choreographed by Birju.  Madhuri had some Kathak training earlier in her life, and her unparalleled general dancing talent and charms make her the actress that best performs Birju's film choreographies.  A hallmark of Birju's touch, in "Kahe Chhed Mohe" Madhuri easily handles the most complex hand gestures of all of Birju's film choreographies, elevating her mystique in depicting a skilled courtesan charming her patrons.  While Madhuri's facial expressions depict many different moods, they are a bit exaggerated and reminiscent of her style seen in other popular film dances.  Devdas was a blockbuster, lavishly expensive for its time, and this song is well-remembered in accounts of Kathak in Hindi cinema.  Devdas was also the formative film for my interest in classical dance in Indian movies, so has a dearly special place in my heart!  Birju also is credited at the end of the film as the "guest music composer" for the song and is listed as a playback singer, apparently singing the male vocal line and reciting the bols/rhythmic syllables.  The end credits also list "Shashwati" as the choreography assistant for Pandit Birju Maharaj, surely a reference to his long-time associate Saswati Sen.


Unlike the slow pace and lingering camera work of Shatranj Ke Khilari, Birju's film dances in the last 20 years are all greatly altered and transformed by the camera techniques capturing them and the post-production edits that alter the resulting version we as an audience see.  One of my favorite academics with a critical lens on the history of Kathak dance, Pallabi Chakravorty, helped me connect how these shifts affect a film dance.  Comparing the "Kahe Chhed Mohe" mujra in Devdas to Rekha's celebrated mujras in the 1981 film Umrao Jaan (choreographed by another Kathak great, Kumudini Lakhia), Pallabi perceptively observes:
"Despite the fact that the legendary Kathak maestro Birju Maharaj choreographed [the] dance sequence [in Devdas], the rapid editing technique (reminiscent of contemporary music videos) creates a strong aesthetic shift from the slow languorous (vilambit) pace of Umrao Jaan [1981].  Rather than holding the gaze of the camera in the reciprocal exchange of darshan, the dancing is pursued by the camera, splicing and fragmenting it.  The constantly jerking camera movements reflect and refract the glittering candlelight in the background and allow no room for building an emotional connection between the audience and the dancing imagery; the emotion remains purely on the surface.  The aesthetics of excess and conspicuous consumption reduce Chankramukhi's dancing to nothing more than a visual orgy—a spectacle.  The visual density of images provides very little sensuous experience that can evoke the pleasure of rasa.  Rather, it evokes the erotic desire associated with commodity aesthetics...[1]"
In line with Pallabi's observations, the absolutely enormous interior in Devdas swamps the dancers and makes the camera shift around, zoom, and constantly stray from how the courtesan appears from the view of Devdas himself.  The music is also restless and in the style of popular films, and would lend the sequence a very different feel if it was more slow-paced and traditional.

Compare the feature film spectacle above with Saswati Sen below in a classic Doordarshan-style 90s studio setting, performing the Lucknow gharana thumri "Mohe Chedo Na Nand Ke," the original version composed by Birju's granduncle Bindadin Maharaj that part of the Devdas song was drawn from (and that Birju himself emoted to in Khayal Gatha per my last post).  Here, you can focus and linger, though the cuts are still intrusive.




Pranali: The Tradition (2008, Hindi)

Before we get to Birju's most recent work, we have to make a brief pit stop at what has to be Birju's worst film involvement, the "tandava dance" in Pranali: The Tradition, a b-grade looking, poorly-made and edited film about the plight of devadasis.  The dancer, actress Nargis, is said to have received training from a student of Birju Maharaj flown in to train her, followed by Birju "who personally taught the nuances of Kathak" [9].   It was completely unnecessary since the result is cringeworthy in every aspect...camera techniques, editing, dramatic music, execution of the choreography, the amateur feel...so bad!  Surely that's why Birju is only listed as a distanced "creative guide" in the opening credits.

Video starts 1:23:01


Vishwaroop (2013, Hindi version of Vishwaroopam in Tamil) 

Moving along to Birju's most recent stuff, Kamal Hassan secured him for "Main Radha Tu Shaam" in Vishwaroop which features a much smaller set of the standard group of dancers, this time in an instructional practice-style session in front of their guru.  I'll spare you my opinion of Kamal Hassan's emoting (let's just say I wish Birju himself would have been the guru on screen, glimpses that we can see in this "making of" clip), but at least Kamal is attempting to use many stylized hand gestures, which are different from those seen in the Tamil version.



Dedh Ishquiya
 (2014, Hindi)

2014's Dedh Ishquiya was another film with a connection to Birju's real-life past, set in the Lucknow area like Shatranj Ke Khilari but trading that film's serious political satire bent for a sharp comedic treatment about thieving crooks in an unclear time period simultaneously old and modern.  The Madhuri-Birju partnership is seen again here, with Madhuri playing the role of a widowed wife of the Nawab and Birju choreographing her dance to the song "Jagaave Saari Raina."  Madhuri's character Begum Para is given a vaguely and unlikely courtesan-like past and explained in the film to have trained under Birju Maharaj"[6].

"Jagaave Saari Raina" is supposed to be a "dancing at home for yourself and no one else" style number at the beginning, but Madhuri's character breaks the fourth walls and looks out at us the viewer occasionally, plus she is being watched by others through the window.  Her character is thinking about the past, so the song opens on her younger self played by Bhakti Deshpande (who has said she trained under Birju in real life, in some fashion).  The movements here are more freeform and casual, though the camera zooms in at 2:30 for an extreme closeup on a single stylized hand gesture that looks like a straightened version of the one of the most basic in Kathak (Utpatti?).  You can see Birju Maharaj (and Saswati Sen is there too!) working with Madhuri in this making of clip.  Compare "Jagaave Saari Raina" with another dance song in the film, "Hamari Atariya," choreographed by Remo D'Souza and also attempts to evoke Kathak but has a different feel, and awful electric guitar. 

Embedding not allowed; click image to link to video


Bajirao Mastani (2015, Hindi)

"Mohe Rang Do Laal" from the opulent period film Bajirao Mastani feels very reminiscent of Devdas but with a vastly expanded scale and technicality, fitting right in with the trend of the last decade of Hindi cinema for epic and ornate historical dramas (such as Jodhaa Akbar, Padmaavat, Ram-Leela, Mohenjo Daro, and more in the works) featuring ample green screen-powered grandeur.  And where there is a historical setting, there is usually some traditional dances!  Just like Birju's past film choreographies, the group Kathak dancers moving in sync are here in the background, but this time the camera exploration is more three-dimensional and less restless than in Devdas and lingers longer with more continuity.

Like "Kaahe Chhed Chhed Mohe" in Devdas, "Mohe Rang Do Laal" is drawn from the extensive thumri output of Birju's granduncle Bindadin Maharaj.  Birju describes the sequence as "a more contemporary adaptation of one of my own performances set on an Avadhi-Brijwasi thumri, Balma re chunaria maiko lal" (also sometimes spelled with 'maika' or 'laal rang de') which he is said to have performed in real life by imaginatively iterating on descriptions of "lal rang" (red color) and meanings of red in that one line of the verse [17,16].  The color red is a subtle accent in the number.  Blogger Shubhendu2011 points out that unlike Madhuri Dixit in Devdas who sports traditional alta red dye applied to her hands and feet, Deepika in "Mohe Rang Do Laal" has only light red powder smears, and the subtlety extends to her abhinaya where she only hints at touching her lips.  The background dancers ingeniously throw puffs of red powder into the air at well-timed moments of the music.

For me, this number drowns in its ornate "prettiness" and Deepika doesn't internalize what she's expressing, hyper-aware of the external gaze on her and relying on the subtlety theme to cover her limited emotive scope.  Her arched back and low-slung skirt also irritate me (anyone else?).  It's interesting how while Deepika does use some stylized hand gestures, a hallmark of Birju's film choreographies, they are not as varied or complex as Madhuri's were in Devdas who used them even in the fast-paced pure dance movements.  Deepika's eyes are certainly large and piercing, about to shed a tear of joy and love, and while I feel calmly soothed by the song and her mannerisms, the whole thing feels a bit empty and soulless.  Apparently Ranveer Singh's character feels the same way as I do, looking unmoved throughout.



Jaanisaar (2015, Hindi)

You would think Jaanisaar would have been a hit, made by the same director as the iconic Umrao Jaan (1981), but apparently it was a critically-derided flop, and if the dances and lead actress are anything to go by, I can see why.  Director Muzaffar Ali brought back the great Kathak dancer and occasional film choreographer Kumudini Lakhia who composed most of Umrao Jaan's dances, and given that Jaanisaar takes place in mid-1800s Awadh just like Shatranj Ke Khilari did, it's no surprise Birju Maharaj was asked to join too.  Since the dance "Hamein Bhi Pyar Kar Le" is confirmed to be Lakhia's work (who says she "used movements from the old traditional Kathak"), the other dance "Achchi Surat Pe" must be Birju's work, an attribution further bolstered by the surprise fact that Birju's granddaughter Shinjini Kulkarni (more on her in my next post) is the background dancer on the left!

In "Achchi Surat Pe," the standard "group of dancers in sync" is seen here in its smallest quantity yet, and they play second fiddle to film debutante Pernia Qureshi in the lead role of a courtesan and who annoys me to no end.  I featured the other Jaanisaar dance on the blog in 2017, calling Pernia's dance "clinical and lifeless [with] only a thin veneer of surface prettiness," but I like the way this reviewer articulates it best: "Pernia keeps twirling and you sadistically wish that she tripped on her own dress."  Achchi Surat Pe is exquisitely shot with darkened lighting highlighted by candlelight flickers, but Pernia just doesn't connect.



Vishwaroop 2 (2018, Hindi; Vishwaroopam 2 in Tamil)

In last year's sequel to Vishwaroop, unsurprisingly named Vishwaroop 2(2018, Hindi), the title song features a brief footwork reprise from "Main Radha Tu Shaam" before devolving into violence, but what thrilled me was discovering the song "Tu Srotu Hai" ("Naanaagiya Nadhimoolamae" in Tamil) that shows a brief but pretty group stage dance at 1:06 that is then followed by a little boy practicing Kathak in a small, home class setting at 1:40, with some more practice with his mom later in the song!  Yay, practice dance!  For an even greater cool factor, the old woman in the song is Waheeda Rahman, the celebrated actress and dancer of decades ago, whose character appears to be reconnecting with Kamal Hassan's, pointing to a real-life photo of her younger self with a child Kamal Hassan so many years ago.

Stage dance at 1:07, practice dance at 1:39


Kalank (2019, Hindi) 

And that brings us to the current year, 2019! "Ghar More Pardesiya" from Kalank released earlier this year features the biggest group yet of young women dancing in sync.  It's an impressive feat to get that many dancers in near-perfect sync, though they perform movements that are more "Kathak-inspired," simple, and fun.  The camera elevates, tracks, and moves through complex configurations of the dancers and their flowing skirts, showing off the strength of dance designed for the camera, something not seen in Birju's past film dances.  It took me three watches of saying "wow, that woman at the beginning really looks like Madhuri" before realizing it was her, which tells me she has had some cosmetic treatments done to her face.  Madhuri emotes at the beginning but never joins in the group dance, but Alia Bhatt does, performing some quick flourishes that look impressive and fun, especially with all the dancers behind her spinning along with her in perfect sync.  Alia has said she learned Indian classical dance for a year and worked on the emoting with Birju Maharaj a week before the song's filming commenced, but her expressions seem limited.



Kathak History

Like all "classical" dance forms in India, what we today call Kathak has its own share of marginalized practitioners and a complex history throughout the evolution of performing arts in North India.  I've listed a few great academic sources on the subject in the "Scholarly Sources" section at the bottom of this post.  Many scholars in recent years have examined Kathak history with a critical lens, and they have shown that women have largely been forgotten or under-recognized in Kathak.  These excerpts from Margaret Walker's article "Courtesans and Choreographers: The (Re)Placement of Women in the History of Kathak Dance" [18] summarize this perspective:
"Promotional material about Kathak commonly alludes to its blend of Hindu and Muslim traditions but unhesitatingly attributes the dance's origins to the Hindu hereditary male performers called Kathaks. These men are still considered authorities on Kathak's authentic style and continue in many ways to dominate the dance world. Although one cannot deny the involvement of these male musicians and dancers in north Indian dance, their largely unchallenged hegemony through the twentieth century belies the influence of women, hereditary and non-hereditary, on the development of Kathak dance..." 
"The first few generations of women dancers of the twentieth century...are a documented group of individuals, many of whom are still actively involved in the performing arts. Yet, although their names and faces are well-known and some books on Kathak dance include their biographies (Kothari 1989), many of their contributions are not recognized or have been absorbed into the legends and legacies of the hereditary male dancers..." 
"Ownership and stylistic authority still rest officially with the male Kathaks, and one can observe a type of cultural magnetic field which causes the efforts and creations of others to be credited to them. Yet the answer is clearly not to disenfranchise the Kathaks in turn; they are and were, by and large, excellent teachers and creative artists who, having grown up in musical families, present an internalized form of artistic knowledge inimitable by those who have trained outside their homes. The contributions of these men to the Kathak of today are undeniable, but the contributions of women, both hereditary and non-hereditary need to be equally recognized."
I was struck by seeing Saswati Sen in the "making of" clips for some of Birju's film dances (Bajirao Masatani, Dedh Ishqiya) where she is sometimes beside or behind Birju but other times trains the lead dancer directly, yet she usually isn't credited for them, Devdas being the exception.  There was one media article I read (that I can't locate now) that implied Saswati assisted Birju for all of him film dances, and I would not be surprised if that were the case given how closely she has worked with and been seen with him in recent years.  I wonder to what extent she impacted the direction of the dances and what her contributions were!  Similar to some of the prominent women associated with Birju's dance trajectory (Kumudini Lakhia, Reba Vidyarti, and many others), she seems to not be given her due.

Coming up soon, a post on film Kathak choreographed by Birju Maharaj's relatives!

Scholarly Sources and Further Reading

1. Chakravorty, Pallabi.  Bells of Change: Kathak Dance, Women and Modernity in India.  2008.
2. Chakravorty, Pallabi. "Dancing into Modernity: Multiple Narratives of India's Kathak Dance."  Dance Research Journal. Vol 38, No 1/2, 2006.
3. Kothari, Sunil. Kathak: Indian Classical Dance Art1989.
4. Lalli, Gina.  "A North Indian Classical Dance Form: Lucknow Kathak."  Visual Anthropology. 17, 19-43, 2004.
5. Muni, Anisha.  American Kathaks: Embodying Memory and Tradition in New Contexts.  May 2018.  CUNY Academic Works.  
6. Vanita, Ruth.  Dancing with the Nation: Courtesans in Bombay Cinema.  2018.
18. Walker, Margaret.  "Courtesans and Choreographers: The (Re)Placement of Women in the History of Kathak Dance."  Dance Matters: Performing India.  Eds. Chakravorty and Gupta. 2010.

Media Sources

7. "Manodharma: Evocative abhinaya of the inner dancer… a world beyond teaching."The Asian Age. June 4, 2019.
8. "Saswati Sen credits her success to art maestros." Times of India.  February 27, 2012.
9. "Pt Birju Maharaj guides Nargis in Tandav dance."  Indiaglitz.  February 20, 2008.
10. "Pandit Birju Maharaj remembers Girija Devi."  The Asian Age.  November 13, 2017.
11. "In Conversation: Pandit Birju Maharaj Young at 74."The Daily Star.  June 29, 2012.  
12. "I miss the golden days of Hindi cinema: Pandit Birju Maharaj."  Khaleej Times.  April 29, 2019. 
13. "A Legend Unfolds." Democratic World.  May 2012.  Magazine.
14. "Why 'abhinaya' is importance in Kathak."  The Hindu.  June 14, 2019
15. "The Colour of Kathak."The Hindu. September 22, 2016.
16. "Genius' FootnoteThe Pioneer.  September 10, 2013.
17. "Reuniting Katha-Vaachan with Kathak."  Boloji.com. March 25, 2001.

New Kamala Dance Finds in the Tamil Films Mahatma Udhangar (1947) and Illarame Nallaram (1958), and Better Versions of Two Kamala Classics!

$
0
0
I'm back to immersing myself in searching and research, and what do I find this month but two film dances of Kamala that I've never seen before in the 1947 Tamil film Mahatma Udhangar and the 1958 Tamil film Illarame Nallaram!  Then I also discovered that the Films Division Bharata Natyam documentary she was in is now viewable in high resolution, and her Bharatanatyam dance in the 1956 Hindi film Chori Chori has been colorised!  Let's take a look at all these finds, one by one.

The path to discovering the two new film dances started with a new-to-me photo of Kamala that popped up in a Google Images search, which led me to her updated Wikipedia entry that I noticed now has a longer "Partial Filmography" section, which reminded me of the film dances of hers I'm still looking for, which then to some searching that revealed these new finds!  There's also a great dance of Guru Gopinath in Mahatma Udhangar, but I'll save that for a separate upcoming post.



Mahatma Udhangar (1947, Tamil)

According to the ever reliable font of Indian film history and dance Randor Guy, Mahatma Udhangar (also transliterated Mahathma, Udangar, Udankar) was an unsuccessful release directed by G. Pattu Iyer that "sank without a trace and is barely remembered today" ("Remembering D.K. Pattammal,"  Galatta Cinema, September 2009), which must explain why there's so little information readily available on the film.

The YouTube account "UK Golden Movies 2009" posted a first version of the film in December 2018 with a letter outline watermark visible in the bottom quarter of the video, and then in July of this year they posted a second version that seems to be slightly less pixelated and with better contrast but offsets those positives with an ugly logo and subscription overlay icon intruding onto the footage.  The second version is more complete and has this delightful note you see to the left acknowledging the rough shape of the film due to its being the "only copy of this movie in existence."  In existence!  Youtuber uksharma3 extracted some songs and dances from the first version and reuploaded them with the dancer's name in the titles, and that's the version I've embedded below.

The film's intro credits are a mix of Tamil and English, and "Dance Direction" is credited in English to Vedantham Raghaviah and Kaminikumar Sinha while in Tamil the "Nagaloka dance" ("realm of snakes dance") is credited to Baby Kamala as she was known in her early films (thanks to Ragothaman for the translation!).  While it looks pretty clear that Kamala and Guru Gopinath created their own dances, I think Raghaviah and Sinha were responsible for two other dances in the film featuring Anjali Devi and an unknown actress, which are interesting choreographies to be saved for another post (I am still working on my post on Kuchipudi dances in films, and Raghaviah is an important part of that history!).

Onto Kamala's dance, which I was thrilled to see is another example to add to the collection of her famous snake dances!  A cobra status forms an imposing backdrop and also confirms Mahatma Udhangar as the source of the mystery snake dance photo seen in V.A.K. Ranga Rao's article on Kamala's film dances in Sruti magazine (Page 1, Page 2).   The camera focuses only on Kamala at first as she rises like a snake and forms statuesque poses.  Soon she's framed by a group of dancers as she descends the stairs and then performs those classic undulating arm and hand waves.  I love those hand movements at 4:15 that look like the snake version of Kathak hand circles.  So delighted to see another film dance of Kamala's from her younger years!


Comparing Mahatma Udhangar to Kamala's other extant film snake dances I've posted about in the past, it is by far the least technical and has very few Bharatanatyam-inspired movements and aligns more closely to the general graceful film dance style of that time period.  Kamala's most astounding film snake dance must be her early performance in the 1944 Tamil film Jagathala Pratapan in which she shows off such complex dance movements for being so young.  A few years later, she performed another technical and Bharatanatyam-oriented dance as an adolescent to the "Maadar Mudimel" song in the 1950 Tamil film Digambara Samiyar which is described in the Sruti magazine article "Kamala: On the Silver Screen" (pages onetwo, and three) as having "hardly any difference" between what she performed on stage at that time.  A few more years after that, she vaguely evoked a snake as a young woman in the delightful instrumental dance number in the 1956 Tamil film Devta.  Here are all three dances embedded in a YouTube playlist:



Illarame Nallaram (1958, Tamil)

The video quality here is quite bad so it was hard to tell it was Kamala at first, but her closeups and then some of her signature way of moving confirmed that it was her!  A lot of her dance here is the classic film style of that time, but there are plenty of Kamala flourishes and difficult choreography thrown in here and there, particularly in the Kerala-inspired bits, like those arm movements at 1:25:36 and kicks at 1:26:14.  Kamala's dance is so joyous, and the finishing on-beat movements that recur are interesting touches.  The entire song in the film is presented as a stage dance before an audience, and Kamala appears only mid-way through the song, brought in as a guest dancer like the true star she is.  Another great edition to the Kamala film dance collection!

Starts 1:23:34


A Better Version of the Films Division Documentary Bharata Natyam (1954)

Back in 2012, I excitedly discovered that a very low-resolution video of the 1954 India Films Division documentary Bharata Natyam viewable online was centered on Kamala and her guru Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai.  The Films Division has been slowly posting more and more of its catalog on its YouTube channel in the years since then, and while it hasn't posted Bharata Natyam there yet, a kind commenter on my 2012 post recently alerted me that India's Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has a Films Division "Video on Demand" web page where anyone can watch Bharata Natyam for free in much better quality!  I soon realized that page looks to have the entire Films Division catalog viewable by scrolling through the list and clicking on the desired title!  Unfortunately the page appears to be finicky and often shows a server error for me or plays but frequently pauses and buffers.  Looking for other sources, the Video on Demand page on the actual filmsdivision.org domain does not have Bharata Natyam available for viewing, but someone has uploaded it this past summer at archive.org and that's the source I've embedded below.

Look at how much sharper quality this version is!  There's lots of dust and scratches, but the quality of the image is fantastic!  I've included a few screencaps below to show off the high-res greatness, click on them for larger versions.




As I was searching for alternate sources of the video, I spotted that the Films Division's Film Catalogue lists another instance of Kamala dance footage I've never heard of before.  It's in the news reel NR0237 dated 1953, which includes in the description that the reel has footage of the "Music Festival in New Delhi" including "The South India Club presented Kumari Kamala, a Bharatanatyam danseuse."  Would love to see that!

The Films Division catalog (and VOD page) also list the Bharata Natyam release date as 1956 which contradicts the BFI source I had used before to determine the date 1954, but the catalog also says the director was Madhu Bose which is incorrect since the title credits of the video itself list Jagat Murari as the director, matching the BFI's information.  So, I'm not sure whom to believe.


Chori Chori (1956, Hindi) Has Been Colorised!

Back in 2010, I had posted about Kamala's splendid Bharatanatyam dance in the 1956 Hindi film Chori Chori, which was not only one of the few good Bharatanatyam dances in Hindi cinema but also had great black-and-white contrast.  In the past few years, more and more classic Indian films are being digitally colorised with improved quality, and Ultra Studio has done so for Chori Chori!  Watching Kamala's dance in color feels so different, almost like it's an entirely different dance.  What determines the color Ultra chose to use for various aspects of the visuals, I wonder?  I can't embed the video, but click on the picture collage below (or click here) to link to her dance!


And yes, that also means that Sai and Subbulakshmi's separate dance in the film was also colorised!


Films I'm Still Looking For, a Scare, and a Photo

Long-time readers of the blog are familiar with my and my friends-of-the-blog championing Kamala's remembrance as such a talented and important piece of Bharatanatyam and film dance history in India, and I've been quite successful in tracking down so many of her film dances.  After looking at the updated partial filmography for Kamala at her Wikipedia entry, I checked my list and see that I am still looking for her dances/appearances in the following films: Valibar Sangam (1938), Sevasadanam (1938), Ramanama Mahimai (1939), Kanchan (1941), Shaadi (1941), Chandni (1942), Vishkanya (1943), En Magan (1945), Ekambavananvishkanya (1943 or 1947), Katagam/Katakam (1947), Vijayakumari (1950), Lavanya (1951), Devaki (1951), Manithan (1953), Vilayattu Bommai (1954), Thirumanam (1958), Chandan (1958), Naach Ghar (1959), Naya Sansar (1959), and Sivagamiyin Sabatham (unknown date).  If anyone finds those, please let me know!

I almost had a mini heart-attack when I read news that "Kamala Laxman" passed away in 2015 before realizing it was not the Kamala Laxman of this post, but rather the children's book author that married the Kamala of this post's former husband, R.K. Laxman.  So yes, in the strangest of coincidences, after R.K. Laxman and the Kamala of this post divorced, he later married another woman also named Kamala, who then went by the name Kamala Laxman!  Sadly, R.K. Laxman also passed away in 2015.  The Kamala of this post was known by many names throughout her lifetime and two marriages: Baby Kamala, Kumari Kamala ("young woman" Kamala), Kamala Laxman/Lakshman (first husband), Kamala Lakshminarayan (second husband), Kamala Narayan, Kamala Narayanan, or simply...Kamala!

To close, I noticed that a couple years back, the National Film Archive of India (NFAI) shared a brief tweet about Kumari Kamala on her birthday, which included this photo (painting?) I've never seen before of Kamala:

Guru Gopinath Dancing in Mahatma Udhangar (1947, Tamil) and BFI Footage, Plus Thoughts on His Legacy

$
0
0
How excited I am to recently find two more visual records of Guru Gopinath dancing in the mid-1940s, one in the commercial Tamil film Mahatma Udhangar and one archival find at the British Film Institute (BFI)!  Back in the dance revival decades of pre and post-independence India, Guru Gopinath was among the trained native Kathakali dancers who brought that dance form and its movement vocabulary to other parts of India and the world.  Gopinath did this first through a touring partnership with the American-born dancer known as "Ragini Devi," and later by creating a Kathakali-derived accessible dance form that seems to be known today as "Kerala Natanam."  Gopinath has been featured on the blog twice before in dance footage from the 1950s.  First was his portly and entertaining dance with Guru Gopalakrishnan/the mohini in the mythological "Mohini Bhasmasur" sequence in the 1957 Telugu/Tamil film Mayabazar, and second was the rare archival find of brief clips from his stage performance in the U.S.S.R. in 1954 as part of the Indian Cultural Delegation.  But these new finds are special because they are from a decade earlier, and feature Gopinath looking noticeably younger and thinner!



Gopinath's Dance in Mahatma Udhangar (1947, Tamil)

Mahatma Udhangar (also transliterated Mahathma, Udangar, Udankar) was an unsuccessful release directed by G. Pattu Iyer that "sank without a trace and is barely remembered today"[6], which must explain why there's so little information readily available on the film.  I shared more information about Mahatma Udhangar in my last post rejoicing about finding Kumari Kamala's dance in the film.

Gopinath performs a 2-minute dance as Shiva to instrumental music, and I am in awe of the first half in particular!  In those introductory movements, he moves around an imaginary axis in such a controlled way, and those half-hop transitions (especially at 1:09) between each side are masterful!  Much of it looks derived from or inspired by pure dance movements in Kathakali, and I wonder if this is similar to the type of dancing he did when touring with Ragini Devi in the 1930s or if he intentionally spiced this up for the film.

Naturally the great Uday Shankar's Kathakali-inspired modern dance in the film Kalpana(released the following year in 1948) comes to my mind when watching Gopinath's dance here, but there's a clear contrast in that Gopinath's movements seem much more controlled and grounded, and I strongly sense his extensive dance training.  It's interesting to note that Gopinath was among the earliest local trainees of Kerala's landmark performing arts training institution Kerala Kalamandalam, and like him, it seems many of his Kalamandalam peers followed a similar path after first leaving the institution by partnering with non-Malayali people who were interested in India's dance reclamation and the revival fervor of the time and creating new works and ideas in dance.  After training in his childhood and then at Kalamandalam, Gopinath partnered with the American dancer Ragini Devi, and likewise I have read of his peers joining such high-profile places as Tagore's Santiniketan institution, Uday Shankar's company, and one dancer Ananda Shivaram ventured to Australia with Louise Lightfoot.  The Kathakali movement vocabulary seems to have made an impression on so many during those formative dance revival decades in India, and it's clear that it left an indelible mark on the way group "ballet" style dances are performed and choreographed.  Gopinath's dance in Mahatama Udhangar fits right in with the time period but his talent sparkles especially brightly!

Starts :25


What's also so interesting about this footage is it is an early example of Gopinath's work in the Madras film industry, given that he and his wife Thankamani are said to have moved to Madras sometime in the early-to-mid 1940s where they started the dance school "Natana Nikethan" which drew dance lovers from afar [3,4,19], and they also worked on a number of films, many at Gemini Studios.  This part of Gopinath and Thankamani's life resulted in some fruitful and important connections.  The iconic drum dance in Chandralekha was supposedly in large part the effort of Guru Gopalakrishnan [7], one of the star students of the Natana Nikethan dance school who became sought after by the film studios [13], and Gopinath is said to have introduced the famous Travancore Sisters Lalitha, Padmini, and Ragini to Uday Shankar for his film Kalpana [8].  

Gopinath and Thankamani actually had worked at Gemini Studios a few years before for the 1941 Malayalam film Prahlada directed by K. Subrahmaniam in his debut, in which they both acted and performed dances.  It was their first film participation and would be thrilling to see now, but according to this article at The Hindu the film was not successful and "no print, or a single film frame or a photograph of the film is available now."  However, in The Hindu's "Trailblazer on the dance stage" article from last year about Thankamani, there is a photo whose caption and appearance looks to be a still of Gopinath and Thankamani in Prahlada!  

A couple random online sources claim Gopinath also appeared as the Jesus Christ figure in the 1951 Malayalam film Jeevitha Nauka, but it doesn't look like him to me as evidenced by this screencap from the film that I took.

Archival Footage of Gopinath's Travancore Palace Dance Company

Another fascinating find is a silent archival clip from the BFI's newly-digitized "India on Film: 1899-1947" collection.  An excerpt from a video the BFI titles "Dancers at Trivandrum Gopinath" dated 1946, it is credited as a "Kathakali dance performance by the palace troupe at Trivandrum (Thiruvananthapuram) featur[ing] the great Indian dancer Guru Gopinath (1908-87)" that was filmed by Clarmont Skrine.  It's only 36 seconds, but you can watch the full 7-minute video at the BFI with the restriction that you must be in the UK (or your connection must look like it's in the UK...).  The preview clip is embedded below, and then underneath I've added some screencaps I took from the 7-minute version.


I thought the young woman dancing with Gopinath in the blue blouse below might be Thankamani, but it doesn't quite look like known photos of her and the dancer looks too young. There are a number of other dancers and musicians seen whose identities I do not know but surely have a rare capture on film.

Left: Unknown    Right: Gopinath



This and the Mahatma Udhangar dance are both from the period of Gopinath's life after he partnered with Ragini Devi in presenting Kathakali inspirations and other whimsical stage compositions in India and abroad in the early-to-mid 1930s.  While many sources of information I've found on Gopinath do not always corroborate the same dates, it seems that Gopinath ended his association with Ragini Devi and returned to what is today Kerala sometime in the mid-to-late 1930s, and in the ensuing years he married Thankamani, the first student of the revived and reconstructed female dance form Mohiniyattam also being taught at Kerala Kalamandalam, and inspired by his work with Ragini Devi, Gopinath continued to refine and perform in partnership with Thankamani the style of dance now known as "Kerala Natanam."

At some point during these same years post his return to Kerala, Gopinath was also appointed by the maharaja/royal family of Travancore as a palace dancer and ran the "Shree Chitrodaya Narthakalaya" dance institution and company there [3,4,19,20], and it is this palace troupe that must be the group seen it the BFI video above!

I found more details about the Narthakalaya in a scan at archive.org of "The Travancore Directory for 1941 Part 1" document published in 1940 (isn't the internet wonderful in bringing to the public these rare finds!) which reads:
The Sri Chitrodaya Narthakalayam was started on the 6th February 1937, with the permission of the Government, for imparting instruction in the Indian Classical Dance based on Natya Sastra as practised in Kerala.  The Narthakalayam is run as a grant-in-aid institution under the management of Mr. Gopinath, the Palace Dancer, and under the general supervision and guidance of the Palace Sarvadhikariakar ... Instruction is imparted by Mr. Gopinath and Sry. Thankamani (Mrs. Gopinath) supported by a select group of musicians who form the background orchestra.  The course of the instruction to regular pupils extends over a period of four years, at the completion of which certificates will be issued ... The institution is open to all who desire to receive a course of instruction in Indian Classical Dance ... Attached to the Narthakalayam, is a Dancing Troupe which is available for public and private performances in and outside the state.  Arrangements for such performances can be made by correspondence with Mr. Gopinath, Palace Dancer, Trivandrum.
Currently available on ebay is another incredibly rare find, an original invitation from the Government of Travancore for the opening of the Sri Chitrodaya Narthakalayam in 1941 and a signed note from Gopinath himself (pictured below), as well as the event program and a handwritten note.  Maybe the school had its start in 1937 but wasn't fully operational or didn't have it's formal opening until 1941?



More on Guru Gopinath and Kerala Natanam

When I posted about Guru Gopinath before on the blog, I had figured the dance style known today as "Kerala Natanam" that he is attributed to creating was one of the many alternative dance creations and newly-named styles that have regularly appeared in India in the decades following the dance revival as performing artists contest existing "classical" dance categories (or contest a previous contestation!), advocated for overlooked dance styles and communities, and created new dances of their own drawn from the many inspirations of the dance revival.  I assumed Kerala Natanam had never been considered a legitimate dance form given the stronghold of Kathakali and Mohiniattam from Kerala, and I figured it sort of died out or was hardly known.  An article last year reinforced this view, describing it as a style that is "at best a museum piece with few proponents"[8].

But in researching for this post, I discovered that after Gopinath died in the late-1980s, since then there has been a resurgence of interest and practitioners of Kerala Natanam (also transliterated Kerala Nadanam) in Kerala. There are multiple media articles in recent years reporting on the form appearing in dance competitions in Kerala, many performance videos of it on YouTube, and it has recognition now by the Kerala government.  It seems the revival all started in the 90s.  There was a 1993 "global conference on Guru Gopinath and Kerala Nadanam" held in Kerala at which students of Gopinath recognized his "traditional creative dance style originating from Kerala"[21], and soon after in 1994, the Kerala government established the Guru Gopinath Natana Gramam (Guru Gopinath Dance Village) on land given by Gopinath's 1960s-founded dance institution Viswa Kalakendra [4,23,24] (Viswa Kalakendra is still around but focuses on music now rather than dance [22]).  As stated on its website, the Guru Gopinath Dance Village now functions as a "centre for learning, training and research in various Indian dance forms, particularly Keralanatanam, the dance form composed by the maestro Guru Gopinath," and in 2015 a very nice Guru Gopinath National Dance Museum was opened on site [18].

Gopinath portraying Navarasa [image source: 12]

Gopinath seems to have performed both creative Kathakali derivatives/inspirations but also traditional Kathakali dance throughout his lifetime.  In Douglas M. Knight's book Balasaraswati: Her Art and Life, he differentiates that at the All India Dance Festival in Bombay in 1945, there were traditional dancers but also "innovators of modern Indian dance, including Ram Gopal, who mixed several styles into one program, and Gopinath, who presented programs entitled 'Palace Dancer.'"  Yet Gopinath was also listed as performing "Kathakali" in the daytime program for the momentous All India Dance Seminar in New Delhi in 1958, along with the eminent Kathakali Guru Kunchu Kurup, and there were also nighttime Kathakali performances in the program credited to Kerala Kalamandalam and "Guru Kunchu Kurup and Party"[14].

It's hard to get a grasp on what exactly Kerala Natanam "is."  Summarizing most accounts I've read, it can be described as combining the less complex pure dance of Kathakali with the graceful Mohiniyattam dance style.  Watching online clips of "Kerala Natanam" dance from recent years, it looks like what you would imagine the Kerala equivalent of solo dance forms like Bharatanatyam, Odissi, and Kuchipudi to be, drawing its movement vocabulary and some music stylings from that southwest corner of India which makes it distinct.  Mohiniattam has always struck me as being exquisitely beautiful but with limited boundaries that constrain its breadth of movement, and Kathakali seems to be a very stylized and complex dance drama theater tradition.  Given what I've read of Gopinath's intentional efforts to connect his dance style to classical sources like other recognized "classical" dance forms did, it seems like "Kerala Natanam" would have been a better candidate for a reconstructed and robust "classical" solo dance form of Kerala than Mohiniattam was, but Mohiniattam had been established much earlier as a dance form and it claimed connection to female traditions of the past (as with all "classical" dances in India, this history is complex and contested and much beyond the scope of this post!).

I would love to know more about Gopinath's legacy and what really happened, and I wonder how Kerala Natanam is really viewed in Kerala today as a "relative" newcomer given the many dance and performing arts traditions found in that state.  I'm intrigued that Kerala Natanam is not offered at the Kerala Kalamandalam, but it is of course offered at the Guru Gopinath Natanagramam and this promotional group instruction video from the school looks to align it with other formal and respected dance institutions like the Kalamandalam.

There are a few sources I've not been able to find but that surely would be helpful to more fully understand Gopinath's legacy and his dance style.  The most accessible would be the one written in English, Gayathri Subramaniam's 2016 book Kerala Natanam, that aims to document the past and present of the dance form [17].  The others are all in Malayalam, so those of us that don't understand that language would need a translation.  Two are written by Gopinath himself, his 1985 autobiography in Malayalam Ente Jeevitha Smaranakal and his 1970 book Natana Kairali, and another that sounds helpful is Annie Johnson's book Guru Gopinath published in 2013 in Malayalam.  Maybe someday I'll locate these!


Sources and Further Reading:
  1. Cheerath, Bhawani.  "Trailblazer on the Dance Stage" [about Thankamani Gopinath].  The Hindu.  March 22, 2018.
  2. Cheerath, Bhawani. "Guru Gopinath National Dance Museum celebrates Indian dance forms and its tradition."  The Hindu.  November 24, 2017.
  3. Chowdhurie, Tapati.  "An Ode to Perfection." [about Thankamani Gopinath].  The Statesman.  June 2018.
  4. Chowdurie, Tapati. "Epitome of Creative Dynamism." [about Guru Gopinath]. The Statesman. November 2017.
  5. Devi, Ragini.  Dance Dialects of India1972/1990.
  6. Guy, Randor. "Remembering D.K. Pattammal,"  Galatta Cinema, September 2009.
  7. Khokar, Ashish Mohan.  "Obit/Tribute: Guru Gopalakrishnan No More."Narthaki.com.  2012.
  8. Khokar, Ashish Mohan.  "Remembering Kalamandalam Thankamani and Kelubabu."The Hindu.  April 5, 2018.
  9. Krishna K.R., Kavya.  Dance and 'Gender Performativity': Mohiniyattam and the Making of Malayalee Femininity.  Dissertation.  2014.
  10. Mattson, Rachel Lindsay.  The seductions of dissonance: Ragini Devi and the idea of India in the United States, 1893–1965.  Dissertation.  (Note: This work documents scathing perspectives on Devi's faults and life in a counterbalance to much of the pleasantries written about her.)
  11. Mohan, T Sasi.  "Profile: Guru Gopinath and Kerala Natanam."Narthaki.com. 2002.
  12. Pandeya, Gayanacharya Avinash C.  The Art of Kathakali.  1961.
  13. Paul, G.S.  "Colossus of his times." [About Guru Gopalakrishnan].  The Hindu. September 13, 2012.
  14. Putcha, Rumya Sree.  "Revisiting the Classical: A Critical History of Kuchipudi Dance."  Dissertation.  2011. [Note: Has a very detailed description and reproduces some information from primary sources about the 1958 All-India Dance Seminar in New Delhi.] 
  15. Rahman, Sukanya.  Dancing in the Family: An Unconventional Memoir of Three Women.  2001.
  16. Ramnath, Ambili.  "A 'real artiste'." [About Guru Gopinath].  The Hindu.  June 19, 2009.  
  17. Sreenivasan, Deepthi.  "Documenting Kerala Natanam.Deccan Chronicle.  December 8, 2016.
  18. Sudhkaran, Abjijeet.  "Museum awaiting greater patronage."  The Hindu.  November 16, 2017.
  19. Vinodini, G.  "Seventy Years of Kerala Natanam."  Narthaki.com.  2002.
  20. Zarrilly, Philip.  The Kathakali Complex: Actor, Performance and Structure.  1984.
  21. "Art Forms."  Bharatha Kshetra.
  22. "Viswa Kala Kendra."  Keralatourism.org.  
  23. "Guru Gopinath Natanagramam."  Keralaculture.org.
  24. "Guru Gopinath Natana Gramam.  Wikipedia. [Note: Not well sourced.]

Rare Madame Menaka Find: The Menaka Archive

$
0
0
A few days ago, an article on Madame Menaka by the great Indian dance historian Sunil Kothari was published in The Asian Age, and I was heartened to see that the title of his article is about his viewing a clip from "The Tiger of Hastinapur," which by his description of the brief tiger and king visuals and reference to my blog, is clearly the video clip I posted online years ago from the 1938 German feature film Der Tiger Von Eschnapur (see here and here) which, due to the editing program I used, included brief glimpses of the scenes before and after the dance sequence.  I love knowing that rare video clips I have posted or sourced are being seen by such knowledgeable people as Kothari who lived through so much of India's dance history!  There is some confusion and perhaps typos in Kothari's article, given that the photo and descriptions he references from Damayanti Joshi's book on Madame Menaka, which I own, actually refer to the film and the photo still as "Die Tiger von Eschnapur," not "The Tiger of Hastinapur," and he also amusingly refers to me as "Milai Milan." :)

Anyway, Kothari's article prompted me to see if any new Madame Menaka finds had surfaced online in recent years, and through a quick search I discovered something EXTRAORDINARY: some Indian dance and music history enthusiasts/scholars in Germany have created an online archive, "The Menaka Archive," dedicated entirely to Madame Menaka (aka Leila Roy-Sokhey, 1899-1947) and her Indian ballet group's European performance tour from 1936-1938 at http://menaka-archive.org Note that the archive is in the German language, and while it does have an English option, the English translations seem to be automatically generated so are not fully accurate;  I have linked to those pages or linked to/used automatic Google Translate translations throughout this post where possible (but for those that appear in German, you'll need to use the translation features of a browser like Google Chrome).

The archive looks to be the brainchild of two Germans, Markus Schlaffke, a documentary filmmaker and doctoral student at the Bauhaus University Weimar researching the Menaka Ballet in Europe, and Isabella Schwaderer, a research associate at the University of Erfurt who is also working on a project about the European reception of the 1936-1938 Menaka ballet tour.  The efforts looks to have sprung from the artistic research project/collective of which Schlaffke and Schwaderer seem to be a part, Zinda Naach, that has aimed to hold Indian dance performances in recent years along the original route of the Menaka tour.  In such coincidental timing related to Kothari's November 11 article this month, the Zinda Naach Facebook page (which writes in English) shared that The Menaka Archive went live a few days earlier on November 6, proclaiming:
... We are now able to trace Madame Menakas performances in Europe from an overall perspective for the first time. Over the last years we have researched documents of Menakas performances in Europe in hundreds of Archives and private collections. We have ordered these finds and assigned them to a digital database that is now available to the public as 'The Menaka Archive' (www.menaka-archive.org). We understand The Menaka Archive as a collaborative platform for further research and reconstruction of a specific history of artistic modernity, written jointly by dancers and musicians in India as well as in Germany ... The Zinda Naach performances will from now on continue as a series of events under the umbrella of The Menaka Archive in order to activate and decipher its archival findings. We kindly invite you to explore The Menaka Archive holdings and to contribute to its research program.
The first thing visitors to the Menaka Archive see is—guess what!—the other Menaka troupe dance from the 1938 film Der Tiger Von Eschnapur!  I think the archive's version, given the sharper appearance and some scratch lines, may come from a copy of the film in Germany, rather than the lesser-quality but longer one I had found and posted.  Here's a screencap of the archive's homepage:

Screencap from www.menaka-archive.org

Looking at the rest of the archive website, I quickly realized the incredibly-rare finds finds in it.  On the left-hand navigation, the "All" section under "Archive" brings up 539 thumbnails of many wonders: rare photos of Menaka's troupe, press and newspaper clippings, correspondence, notebooks, and a few AUDIO recordings from the troupe's musical ensemble!  It seems the other sections under "Archive" present some of the 539 archival documents in different ways—there is a map documenting the troupe's 1936-38 European tour performance locations, a chronological list of performances, repertoire list, and troupe identifications, all with many links that connect the viewer to an applicable archive document or holding if available!  The separate Journal section features a few articles that offer insightful scholarship and analysis related to Menaka's troupe, musicians, legacy, and broader perspectives on perceptions of dance, religion, and art in Europe at that time—though I found the automatically-generated English translation hard to understand in many places.

Screencap from www.menaka-archive.org

The archive's holdings are listed as coming from various sources mostly in Germany and The Netherlands, but one notable and significant source and partnership is from India: Sarod-maestro Irfan Muhammad Khan of the Lucknow-Shahjahanpur-Gharana, whose grandfather Ustad Sakhawat Hussain Khan was also a Sarod maestro and at one point the music director of the musicians accompanying the 1936 Menaka Hindu Ballet Tour (and can be seen in one of the Der Tiger Von Eschnapur clips).  Schlaffke featured Irfan and a documentary trailer about him (also embedded below) in his article at the Menaka archive, "Counter-tales to the National Cultural Heritage: The Role of Muslim Musicians in the Invention of National Tradition in India at the Menaka Archive," and from videos on Schlaffke's Vimeo page and Zinda Naach's Facebook page, it appears Irfan was able to fulfill his dream and visit and perform in Germany with Zinda Naach and hear and see important archival finds related to his grandfather.  How wonderful for him, but certainly tempered by the sadness he feels at the loss of so much of his family's tradition and need to preserve and pass it on.  [Note: To learn more about the history of Irfan's family tradition and decline, I recommend an article unrelated to the archive at Scroll.in, "In Kolkata, the inheritor of the Lucknow-Shahjahanpur gharana is trying to keep its legacy alive."]


In Markus Schlaffke's article "Historical Perspectives of Indian Dance Modernism: Field Research in Delhi, Kolkata and Chennai" at the Menaka Archive, he describes how he visited India in 2018 on a research effort "to resume some of the connections between Germany and India that were made in 1936-38 and later lost."  He shared some of the archive's rare European-sourced materials with people in India and "documented their reactions and reflections" including some video footage of Ashish Mohan Khokar's dance archives and Khokar's thoughts on dance in India in the early-to-mid twentieth century.

In a longer version of Isabella Schwaderer's archive article "Oriental Spectacle on German Stages Until 1937"found at the "Decolonize Erfurt" blog, she embeds one of the dances from the Der Tiger Von Eschnapur film and describes it as "the only film footage yet of the dances of the [Menaka] Indian ballet" that "fit[s] seamlessly into the orientalist spectacle."  Further acknowledgement of the rarity and importance of those dance clips from Der Tiger Von Eschnapur!  But also, unfortunately, dashing any hopes of seeing more video recordings of Menaka or her troupe in the archive at present.  At least any rare finds in the coming years will have a perfect home in this archive!

Schlaffke and Schwaderer also just this month published an article in the online publication wissenderkuenste.de, "(Re-)connecting embodied archives: Artistic research in the Zinda Naach collective," which expands upon some of their articles at the archive.  It also answered my question if they were aware of the most detailed publication of Menaka's life, Damayanti Joshi's 1989 biography of her—they are but write that "the documents that were available to [Menaka's] student Damayanti Joshi for the only publication to date on Menaka's biography are currently not available" which must have been frustrating for them.  There have been a few other full articles or chapters written about Menaka in Indian publications over the years.  I've come across Shirin Vajifdar's "Menaka: Pioneer of Kathak" in the September 1959 issue of Marg, her husband Sahib Singh Sokhey's "Menaka Gave Ballet to the Indian Stage" in the December 1963 issue of Natya, Projesh Banerji's "Menaka's New Dimension to Kathak" in his 1982 book Kathak Dance Through Ages, Susheela Mishra's "Madam Menaka (Leila Sokhey) Who Ushered In the New Era of Kathak" in her 1992 unimaginatively-named book Some Dancers of India, and Menaka gets a few solid paragraphs in Sunil Kothari's 1989 book Kathak Indian Classical Dance Art, plus at least a mention in many more.  In EuroAmerican publications, Menaka's obituary was published under "Lady Sokhey" in the May 31, 1947 issue of The New York Times, and I also located an early article "Menaka and Indian Dancing" written by Tyra de Kleen of Stockholm, Sweden, from a 1937 issue of Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology.  But Joshi's book seems to be the only full-length work dedicated to Menaka.

Something else is tantalizing: on Schwaderer's institutional profile page, her current research project is given the more detailed title, "Dance and Religion in the Nazi era: Press reviews for the tour of the Indian Ballet Menaka 1936-38."  I'm sure I'm not the only one that was surprised to discover when reading about Menaka that the 1936 summer Olympics were held in Berlin during the Nazi regime in Germany, just a few years before WWII and the Nazi's worst atrocities.  That's a research subject all on its own, but then to learn that Menaka's troupe not only performed and won awards at that Olympics but also performed all over Germany and Europe during this time begged the question of how Menaka and her group experienced and reacted to this tumultuous period in Europe.  Some of the articles at the archive touch on this subject and wider discourse about modernism and intercultural crossings, but I look forward to seeing Schwaderer's coming scholarship!

The discovery of The Menaka Archive and scholarship is gripping stuff!  I eagerly await news of new finds being located for the archive in the coming years, and I will soon be reaching out to Schlaffke and Schwaderer and also spreading the word elsewhere about this archive!  This endeavor is such an important contribution to the world's knowledge and understanding of Menaka and her troupe, adding a sharp focus on a certain period of Menaka's output and a fresh perspective from Europe and insights into the "dance-like modernity that was interwoven between Asia and Europe" at that time.

-----------------

My past two posts on Madame Menaka:
Film Dances of Madame Menaka and the Menaka Indian Ballet (January 2013)
Indian Dances in Western Films About India: Part 2 (The Rare) (November 2011)

The Golden Age of Scholarship on Dance in South Indian Cinema is Here

$
0
0
Back in August of last year, as I emerged from a period of gripping ennui that had largely led to my blog hiatus, I eagerly went on an internet search jaunt to see what new finds might be out there, and I happened onto Hari Krishnan's just-published book, Celluloid Classicism: Early Tamil Cinema and the Making of Modern Bharatanatyam.  Within the blink of an eye I had ordered it, and I have slowly been reading it in earnest.

Reading through this masterful contribution has been riveting.  Every chapter is filled with one exciting piece of information after the other, populated with the names of people and films I've encountered over my years of trying to quench my thirst for knowledge of a topic that is little-researched, reclusive, and under-appreciated.

But the book is not simply a descriptive work that reveals anecdotes and tales from the past.  Having dug deep into archives, film print culture, personal collections, and a few candid interviews, Hari is out to explain the significance of the information, make connections, and contribute meaningful and new ideas to the world of scholarship on Indian dance and cinema and the real people and communities involved— the book is based on his doctoral dissertation, after all!

The central arguments of his book are something I've never heard anyone even hint before about Bharatanatyam.  As the back cover describes, "This book unsettles received histories of modern Bharatanatyam by arguing that cinema [...] bears heavily and irrevocably upon iterations of this 'classical' dance" and that there was a "reciprocal exchange of knowledge between screen and stage versions of Bharatanatyam in the early decades of the twentieth century."  That's quite tame frankly, given that by the time one has made it to the end of the book, the "exchange" and "heavy bearing" are clearly even more significant.

Hari covers much ground in the book— devadasis and courtesans in South Indian cinema and recovering information about their professional and personal lives, the different professional and political trajectories men in their communities made as nattuvanars in cinema, the "so-called revival or reinvention of Bharatanatyam" in the 1930s and the elites involved, cinema's importance to popularizing and shaping Bharatanatyam in a multitude of ways, print culture of film magazines and songbooks, the influence of South Indian drama traditions, politics, religion, middle-class and popular culture, and more.

I am still working on a someday-post about my thoughts on the book and some great video finds either referenced in or related to the book's contents, but I must say that one of the most exciting finds for me was the revelation of the impact and central importance to modern Bharatanatyam of Vazhuvoor Ramaiah Pillai and his star student Kamala.  Never has this been more strikingly elaborated and sourced than in this book.

My favorite chapters of the book, and the ones I actually recommend those interested in the topics of my blog read first, are chapters 4 and 5 focused on nattuvanars and choreography in cinema and a detailed analysis of how Bharatnatyam's "aesthetics, technique, and repertoire [were] irrevocably transformed through its encounter with cinema" [Krishnan].  The second half of the book of which they are a part has the least dissertationish "academese," and chapters 4 and 5 had the most exciting contributions to discover in my opinion.  Other highlights for me were Hari's sleuthing to ferret out the truth behind the first Indian dance film Jalaja (1938) and legends of Rukmini Devi supposedly dancing in popular South Indian cinema.

What I'm calling the "Golden Age of Scholarship on Dance in South Indian Cinema" seems to have began with the Kuchipudi dance form first.  Rumya Sree Putcha's 2011 doctoral dissertation Revisiting the Classical: A Critical History of Kuchipudi Dance and Katyayani Thota and Anuradha Tadakamalla's article "Marking the Telugu Cultural Identity: Kuchipudi and its role in cinema" both delved into truth-finding missions to view Kuchipudi's past with a critical lens.  The great Davesh Soneji has also touched on the subject, most notably his 2012 book Unfinished Gestures: Devadasis, Memory, and Modernity in South India.

After Kuchipudi's spotlight, Bharatanatyam and Tamil Cinema followed suit in scholarship, first with just a taste in Sundar Kaali's 2013 brief article "Disciplining the Dasi: Cintamani and the Politics of a New Sexual Economy" focusing on depiction of dasis in 1930s-50s Tamil cinema, and then finally to the subject of this post, Hari's 2019 masterpiece.

My opinion of this "Golden Age" was cemented when I read of a number of recent and upcoming projects in Hari's book.  His bibliography reveals that a forthcoming compilation Dance and the Early South Indian Cinema is in the works, edited by the great Davesh Soneji, Tiziana Leucci, and Hari himself.  It's slated to include an article "Patronage of Hereditary Performing Artists in Tamil Cinema: The Case of V.S. Muthuswamy Pillai" by Tiziana Leucci as well as, according to her CV, Rumya Sree Putcha's article "Cinematic Archives: History, Historiography, and Dance in the South Indian Film Industry."  I also learned of Katyayani Thota's unpublished 2016 dissertation, "Stage to Screen, and Back: A Study of the Dialogue between Kuchipudi and Telugu Cinema."  I am looking forward to getting my hands on any and all of these!

Such joy I feel that the writings on dance in South Indian cinema are moving beyond simple descriptive stories of the past through a nostalgic lens to a full-fledged topic of study and critical analysis.  These recent scholarly contributions are delving into and situating the importance of cinema dance to the history of these dance forms— and oh how important it has been!

Last, I found it incredibly humbling and affirming to discover, without any prior knowledge, that me and my blog and a few of my blog posts were referenced in Hari's book.  I can't quite describe how it felt as I cracked open my newly-arrived paperback and soon saw my name and "Cinema Nritya" mentioned in a few places, starting in the introduction.  I'm one of many sources in the bibliography, specifically my posts on Tara Chaudhri, Sayee and Subbulakshmi's Film-Industry Relatives, and Muthukumara Pillai on screen in Kannika.  All smiles here!

May the Golden Age be long lasting and fruitful!
Viewing all 80 articles
Browse latest View live